English

This gallery contains 115 images @ 12 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Comments

  • Zane
  • 4 months ago:

Rylsky, how do you keep from coming in your pants when you're photographing Alysha?

Easy. Just try to imagine camera and lens in your 2 hands, 1 eye watching viewfinder (1 inch, not your 50" plasma TV), think about poses, light and people around. OK? good , now try to relax and yoiur pants will be always dry front and only wet (sweat) part will be rear.

cheers!

WHAT I'M LOVIN: Alysha's legs (she most definitely knows how to use them), 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 23, 24, 30, 35-37, 47-49, 54 (cormorants do something like this, but I like Alysha's version MUCH better), 67, 70, 74-76, 89-91, 102!!!!, 108, 113,

MY PREFERENCES: A LOT like this.

OTHER NOTES: Mother said never to put your feet on the dining room table ... mother was wrong. She was wrong about a lot of things. :)

I should have read the previous comments, however I was surprised Rylsky reads them. I always look through your sets because you have a sense of style that sets you apart from the crowd. I was never sure if those sets with water were interesting in spite of their looking dangerous or because they did. :-) I like met art because it is exactly what I want. Pictures of beautiful women naked. I try to rate by set not by shot as I get carried away with my own pet enthusiasms(mine is bottoms :-) ) and I realise not every taste is the same; i.e. the horde of big boobs fetishist, shaved, unshaved etc. Like your work Rylsky and envy your career choice.

Aside from the being beautiful and sexy this model has something extra that clearly shows in a significant portion of the shots. This girl IS A MODEL! some terrific shots there. Alysha should get a shot at one of those model shows on tv.

Alysha, you're a natural beauty. You were created with it ... and it is rare.

So, go back to natural with your hair.

You'll be even MORE beautiful.

Alysha is a very slender model with a very beautiful face,lovely ltgs great body,and perfect legs Rylsky has done a perfect job of photography.I really don't give a damn about photoshopping or not,the idea is to present a beautiful girl in an erotic shoot. If photoshopping makes her feel better,or shaving or waxing or not bothering makes her feel better. then I don't care,as long as the girl feels erotic and shows it.

Rylsky show us another piece of Paradise with this beautiful Blonde Princess:-) Well done!!! The picture of Her stunning Smile that I have in my living room, remember me that Princesses of Fairy Tales really exist... And Alysha is one of those... It would be nice to have a set or video of Her with a Princess Dress:-) Kisses all over Stunning Alysha:-):-):-)

Small correction:-( Rylsky shows us and not show us...

Wow, very sexy lady in a very sexy short tight skirt and blouse! Could it get any better than this. Yes is could, indoors and outdoors. Alysha I would love to run into you in the woods wearing that short skirt. Rylsky, you da man!

Its been a while since we've had a rating this high! Truly a masterpiece from the Maestro!

In Ratings We Trust???
LOL

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

LOL :-)))

That should be MA's new motto! :-))))

That, or "Where flawed beauty meets Photoshop." :-)

Present company excepted, of course :-)

the problem of any multiple models and photographers site.

about photoshop: if you know models who are NOT porn industry profesionals and who doncare how they will look like - let me know. you have the choice of 100s of sites without photoshop with models who worked for 10s of studies in all porn niches. buy membership there! you didn't.

why do you here? because of many non-professional beauties and because THEY BELIEVE that people like to see erotic photography, not raw meat shots.

peace

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Actually at one time I did buy into a supposedly non-photoshopped site or 2. And I really did like the sense of "reality."
I think photoshopping often goes too far here, unnecessarily. IOW, I think photogs would find there is more tolerance and appreciation of "flawed" than they think there is.
It might be an acquired taste in some cases -- people wouldn't be used to the look of "reality."
I know there are some viewers who like photographic "reality" or "quality" to be painted over, but I think more people don't.
A lot, probably most, don't even know it's being done.
Though more and more may be learning :-))))

just answer:
1. any site without photoshop and with multiple EXCLUSIVE NON-PRO PORN MODELS who was INFORMED that they modeling there for millions eyes in Internet.
2. any TOP stars names who doncare about retouch, but worked for only 1-2 sites and photographers
3. any reason for girl to be erotic model and show to you all dermatological details in 50MPx.
4. any period in Photography History where retouching in portraits was never made. It was right from XIX century retouched, my friend. Only genres where you 've seen all details was crime scene photography, "reality" homemade (for private use), medical photography. AS A FACT, when some person paid for portrait - it was 30% max to photographer and 50% minimal to retoucher.

erotic don't need ALL details. you are crazy if you love a woman and use microscope to make you hard.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I'm thinkin' of u-know-who. She has numerous scars, lots of body hair, various flaws, and I love 'em all -- the ones I can see. It's because she is at her best so basically beautiful and radiant.
I like her photoshopped too, but since I know stuff's been removed, I'm always aware of the unreality.
So I would strive as a photog to capture as much real as I could. Assuming I thought the girl was truly good-looking or interesting -- if not "flawless."
Recall -- some art is intentionally marred to rid it of "perfection" -- it becomes more beautiful...

you really need 2 hours of free time and please watch what reality TV shows (CREATES).
yes, "Wag The Dog" movie. I bet you gotta llllove it!

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

It's on my list :-)

I like her photoshopped too, but since I know stuff's been removed, I'm always aware of the unreality.
=====
TV Monitor IS REALITY???
:))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I'm MORE unaware of the unreality :-)))

Hey, this iMac's better than TV! :-)))

open your iMac monitor and see who produced the monitor
:)

I bet it will be LG's.
:)))))

At least it will be IPS technology, not woman's skin.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Are you kiddin' -- me open this iMac!?

Regrettably iMac reality is the best I can do here :-)

Now, if you wanna send her to CA, I'll make arrangements :-)))

i said "MULTIPLE MODELS SITE". Your dream girl is 1 and only and her sets are easily retouched. it don't work as example and as an answer at all. i worked with 300+ models and 100+ of them are not professionals and 10s of them are exclusives. Forget about them all (Nikia, Swan, Astrud, Feeona, J.Milton aтв more), IMAGINE you had no chance to see them on MetArt if they dislike how they look on photos. I can say that you may go to metart topmodels page, and virtually remove at least 10 models from Rylsky. And yes, imagine erotic industry without this kind of girls. Silicon + Tattoo Paradise of same girls worldwide? You're welcome, sir, but how could you call it Paradise?

Makes sense finally?

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I know some of those girls have been retouched to some degree. But it's really what you're used to. If you've only seen them retouched, you might be in for a shock.
Maybe you could break the news to us gradually :-? :-)))
I still think in the end we'd love 'em as much if not more.
The question is, would they love themselves -- that more "real", honest image?
Baby, that's your problem! But if they discovered that people liked them as much or more "real", they might be more accepting.
The trouble is, all their previous sets would look "fake." :-)))))

See, it's best not to photoshop in the first place! :-)))
It's as addictive as shaving :-)))

please answer my 4 questions first. now you asked without answering, that's why we will never go ahead from this point of neverending talk about nothing. At my side I have experience and hundreds of examples that proves I am not kidding. And I see nothing makes sense to you from me. why? if you want me to talk - please listen to me, not only you.

your turn. answer 4 Q's above.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I didn't understand those were questions for me to answer :-)
I will give it a go, but I just wanna say, I'm not against all photoshopping. It's a matter of degree, and of what is painted over.
In a world where every girl's published image is photoshopped, yeah, I can understand your point. But that doesn't mean I think the photoshopped girl is better or more beautiful or lovable. In fact, I may find her less so when I sense photoshopping.
I'll get to those questions a little later! :-)

until you will answer on this "cold hard 4" with some facts and links - no discussion is possible. but I feel no problem if you will continue your "photoshop fixation" point of view. you will see this world absolutely different after you'll try to call to 10 girls and ask them to modeling in erotic without retouch and without any guarantees about their private life troubles. Ah, sure you can cheat with girls and say it will be private session only for you, but sure you need to change your name, id and hometown when she and her lawyers+family will search for you and for vendetta. good luck, Mr. Doug "Hunter" Natural.
:)

but if something never happened before (see "C-H-4") - think about it. no chance that 1000s was wrong and only you succeed without any practice, but with very good idea of perfect erotica.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

OK, I'll tip my hand here -- compare Kristel in Stoa and Savell. You're right -- she's only one girl. But there'll be quite a difference in the dermatological details that you see.
As I said, I like her both ways, but I prefer "real."
It's just a thought. I'm going to assume you and your girls know best what "must" be hidden. But I'm still not totally convinced all the coverup is necessary or desirable.
To me, less would be more :-)
What can you get away with? IOW, how much "reality" can you really show?
Does anybody really know?
I guess you're saying you do, and therefore are unwilling to take more chances.
So are we stuck forever with heavily photoshopped models?
See Kristel...
Or maybe not! :-))))
As long as you don't photoshop shaven skin! :-)))))

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Not really. There are plenty of overrated sets here :-)

However, I will suspend judgement on this one till I've gone through all of it! :-)

Well, everybody is gonna think that almost every set is either under- or over-rated, to some extent. We all disagree with a rating more often than agree, some more than others.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

That's good to hear! :-)
One thing I on occasion do unless I think a set is definitely a certain number is try to get its average rating closer to where I think it should be, by voting it somewhat higher or lower than I would otherwise.

I don't mind rating sets (even though I think the ratings are based more on the liking of the model than on the perceived quality of the set.) What I am opposed to is the ranking of models based on their individual ratings. The rating and ranking of models as it seems to be done here is seriously wrong in several ways. A look at the "top 150 models" page* ought to tell almost anybody that.

*if they still even have it. I can't bear to look :-)

I rate the sets (not the models), but I don't let others' ratings sway me at all. I keep track of my own personal scores. With this many sets and this many women, there has to be some way to distinguish between the sets you like the most. Lets face it, the tags are absolutely f-ing worthless and corrupted with meaningless garbage.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I'm glad to hear that. If I'm not mistaken I've rated one whole girl in my entire MA career :-)
You could probably guess who and what she got :-)
How are you supposed to rate a girl? What's the difference between an 8 and a 9?
Sorry, honey, you only rate a 7.
And you, I'm punishing you and your fans with a 4!

They really should toss those ratings out. They are a disgrace.

The Top Models list looks fine to me. Hot and shaved models near the top, not-quite-as-hot and unshaved models further down the list.

All seriousness aside, the only reason that list might be a slightly less accurate look at overall member preference is sample size. I don't think as many members give ratings on model pages. I don't see any glaring errors there, but I don't have some of your obvious preferences.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I have one girl I compare everybody else to. And no one else measures up, even though many are ranked higher.
I think a lot of people are in a similar boat. They don't like their girl(s) being outranked. Of course it wouldn't seem right.
Besides, I disagree with ranking people with such a combination of haphazardness and precision.
I mean, what does the rating/ranking signify? Hotness? Beauty? Lovableness? And how is this determined?
It's wrong to do that to models and their fans.
It's all in the eye of the beholder. And that needs to be shown more respect.
This is not a beauty competition, it's not Dancing with the Stars. To me it's about looking at young women as individuals. Everybody's gonna have their preferences, and see things differently. Let's respect that, but not try to squeeze things into a rating/ranking system that fundamentally disrespects individuals.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Verdict:
Madame Butterfly, you need some hair on that body. You're not made of paint or stone (though gaetano may think so :-)
99 -- best pic :-)

ough, I better will save her words in secret (addressed to you as answer on "more hairs").
:)

8^) I would love to hear that comment! But not here. We don't want to feed the trolls.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Just translate your imagination :-)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

...or, Trolls "Я" Us :-)))

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I suspected that would be the case :-)
She's one sleek lady.
But seriously she'd be sleek with fur too.
A little more decorated...
That hair is aesthetic -- believe it or not, Alysha :-)
And sexy. At least to many people.
Impossible to believe :-?

Maybe someday she'll see what I mean... :-)

Ask her why it's there... :-))))

And you'll still have all that bare pretty skin...

Very sexy and naughty Alysha!Posing in minidress outside without any underwear! Even upskirt with a nice view on here complete shaved pussy!Come back quick beauty!

All us should not be assume to be normal, obvious, that a young girl of olympic beauty like Alysha has the pleasure of being naked, to make us admire every detail of her feminine glory.
No, it is not a normal thing.
It is almost a miracle.
Beauty is a fleeting thing, not be able to enjoy her, is how to forget the cream cake in the oven.
Rylsky, thank you for giving us your muse who comes from the ice and that here blossoms like a mediterranean flower.

I apologize for the way I express myself in English.

gaetano, don't apologize, I enjoy your comments, even when I don't agree with your opinions.
I salute you for expressing your feelings so well in a second (or third?) language. You do very well.

  • Neil
  • 5 months ago:

You are doing just fine, my friend.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

But you're missing a detail or 2... :-)))

I can never imagine Alysha getting any more sexy or beautiful, but she does....every time. Another winner! Mouthwatering even....;o)

Perfect skin, perfect anus and complexion. Good capture Rylsky!

Thanks, but I hope not only "perfect anus" was presented by me here.
anyway, your vision is your vision. feel free

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

But ani are important! :-)))

"anii" ? ( :

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Well, it was either that or the more conventional "anuses" :-)))

Yeah, but that just sounds wrong to me, and "ani" sounds too short. I could be wrong about the Latin plural formation...

2nd declension Latin. Ani.

"Opinions are like ani, Watson. Everyone has one." -Elementary

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Blame Merriam-Webster OnLine! :-))

Her beauty is absolutely breathtaking

Women like Alysha are why minidresses were invented... ( :

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

In dire need of a bush, baby :-)

OMG..why would any one want to cover such a beautiful succulent pussy with a bush...I vote to leave it shaved!!! LOL

Amen!

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Because the hair is beautiful and erotic, and you'll still have that succulent pussy :-)

You just won't be able to SEE IT!!!

And it's only "beautiful and erotic" to some.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

No way -- you'll be able to see it fine in most cases.
I see that hair as equivalent to head hair -- even though some people prefer bald/shaven noggins :-)
I don't get it and never will, how a heterosexual male can not like a woman's pubic hair. Or want it to be shaved/waxed off.
It has always fascinated me big time.
So has underarm hair, usually shaven because that's how you'd normally see it. But unshaven is very hot :-)
To me it's sexual hair. A sexual cynosure. A sexual provocation.
Plus it makes a vulva far more aesthetic.
Mind-blowing notions in this day and age?
But this day and age is rather unusual. Totally dominated by commercial advertising, that I believe distorts people's perceptions of what is desirable.
Could go on from there about how politicians manipulate the commercial media under the guise of news, but I'll refrain :-)
If it don't make sense to ya, there's probably damned good reason, no matter what they may have you believe :-)
Or I may have you believe :-)))))
But seriously, know thyself :-)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Plus, that hair's color will be real (I'm supposing! :-)))

She should let it grow under her arms too. At least so you can see it :-)

She'd be a lot more real (to me, at least :-)

I'm sorry, but I think that the pubic hair is the end of art, the end of eroticism and the beginning of the brothel.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I bet you say that about all women :-)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Emphasis on "all" :-)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Now, wait a minute -- not that I'm into brothels, but I thought they were a place where eroticism could be found...
Plus, pubic hair the end of art and eroticism? In a sense, but not in the way you mean. Pubic hair is nature's art, if not part of certain artists'. And it is certainly a means if not an end of eroticism.
Otherwise, my friend, it wouldn't be there.
Some people think it's the sexiest thing on a woman. So in a way for them it is the last word in eroticism. You could say "the end" of eroticism.
But of course that's not what you meant :-)

One thing's for sure -- Alysha always brings out the philosophers! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Not to cast aspersions on Alysha and Rylsky, but as I begin to look at this set I think, thanks to gaetano, "brothel" -- with that outfit and those poses. Even with no pubic hair!
Again, I'm not casting aspersions... :-)))

Another thing that's "for sure" is that doug will always bring up the same tired old complaint....lol And it doesn't take a philosopher to figure out why.... ;o)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Now why do you imagine I'm always complaining about bushes being disappeared?

It's funny tho -- I don't complain (much, at least) about them being shaven when I can compare them unshaven side-by-side.

But think of the girls here who have never revealed their bush. And why.

They're too shy :-)

Too brainwashed as well :-)

Not really --

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Well, she may not be, but I am :-)))

Try your back yard...;o)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I have a different kind of bush in mind :-)

Then try the front yard...

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Too pubic -- I mean public :-)

Not rachsback, but Confucius.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

What did Confucius have to say about bushes :-?

Hopefully not something too confusing :-)

Confucius say "Man with hole in pocket, feel cocky all day"....

Confucius also say "Doug have many hole in pockets"....;o)

Wow what a nice set! not only is Alysha one of hottest blonds in the Met network but we get inside and outside plus street scenes! Inside for the delicious closeups of that delectable pink flower fully spread for our mouth watering pleasure then outside for some beautiful shots in a lovely birch forest. Then back inside for the last page. Number 85 a glorious portrait of her lovely face and those stunning blue eyes followed by 89 one of the most astounding shots of that unbelievably tight little butt. This is the kind of butt the designers dream of when they are designing pants, skirts and bikini's. There are teens that don't look that good.

Great set guys, Something for everyone except the hair lovers

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

"mouth watering" -- quickly becoming an overused cliché :-)))

Mr broken record speaks of Cliche? when he can hardly get a comment in without something about the need for hair?

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I'm on a mission! :-))

Dry mouth and all! :-)))

it only says that you read too much comments
:)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

True -- I'm drowning in clichés! :-)))

  • Neil
  • 5 months ago:

Alysha is so very pretty, with an angelic face. She has such exquisitely beautiful blue eyes. She is tall and slender. Very nice.




Access The Full Set Of 115 Images By Joining MetArt Today!
CLICK for FREE ACCESS