English

This gallery contains 119 images @ 39 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Comments

Yea! Anuther Met model going to a no-pants party! These Met models must throw some Wild parties.Fifty years or so ago I'd probably go too, specially if they had girls as beautiful as Arina, with her beautiful face and figure, and her totally lovely butt.

BEYOND beautiful-- keep the lawn mowed!

Beautiful. But let your bush row back.

EUREKA! I HAVE FOUND IT...THE PERFECT ASS!!!

Arina is tagged as one of my favourites, and I see no reason to change after today.

Nice, but unusual (?) added touch; for Arina to prove her nationality and age. Most id photos I have seen are a cause of embarrassment, Arina is as attractive, or more, in hers compared to her galleries which are crafted to show her to best advantage.

I beleive that what you saw was an administrative error on the part of the met-art staff.

  • a2m2
  • 4 months ago:

ARINA IS DEFINITELY A GIRL THAT I'D LOVE TO KEEP SEEING EVERY MONTH :0

Arina is just delicious in this set, even outshining the annoying spotlight that Leonardo finds interesting for some reason. Then, once she's had you salivating over every part of her anatomy, Arina shows that even Ukrainian goddesses can have bad passport photos. xoxoxo

Ok is it just me, and my growing questioning of Leonardo, or is her work with Alex across the board better than with Leonardo. I also think Leonardo's photoshop gnome went over ever crouch shot to hide the trimmed bush. Or maybe that damn light burned it off. Ok, so I am a little snarky this morning. I just hate seeing a Ukrainian girl of yours not being presented at her best. So spank me... They should all have to get your approval of the artist that shots them. Protect your girls...

Another annoying Leonardo set. I thought with his last set we had maybe turned a corner but now we are right back to the no closeups and few if any rear shots. Add to that his fixation with that very irritating spot light and this set is a total wash for me

I agree. Some of these images are awful. Where are the editors?

I don't think there are "editors" in the historic sense. Met has given the artist the "freedom" for artistic expression as long as they don't step out of bounds. Our editor's IMO without anything to back it up with, is their duty is limited to compliance with our standards regarding "sexual" content. (Hey, K. Good place to jump in.)


Access The Full Set Of 119 Images By Joining MetArt Today!
CLICK for FREE ACCESS