This gallery contains 120 images @ 30 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


  • ALAN
  • 4 months ago:

Simply stated: REAL women have hair! Some have too much. Eddison is just right, although I'd rather not see furry pits; just my personal taste. There's nothing better than a nice soft furry pussy! Ok, the occasional pube stuck between teeth can be distracting, but it's well worth it!

Bottom line___MA has something for EVERYONE. While I don't find all women here attractive, I don't waste my time bashing them!!

Eddison is a refreshing change all natural pubic hair and a lovely figure all over.

I'm all for diversity, but I really hope this doesn't become a trend at MetArt. Too hairy just doesn't do it for me.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

And you call yourself "all for diversity"?
I guess words don't mean anything to you :-)
If that's too hairy, dude, you are not "all for diversity" :-)

I'm all for diversity in the actual meaning of the word :-) As long as it is equitable :-)
Get out your dictionary :-)

In the meantime, a hairy set like this shows up on MA about once a year, if that. So you don't have too much to worry about yet, Mr Diversity :-)

I couldn't agree less. More of Eddison's adorable, hairy pussy. More hair in general, say I!

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

She is beautifully hairy, isn't she? I mean in a feminine way :-)

I love the natural look!

Pretty girl with a lovely smile. But that uncontrolled growth is not my thing. At least a bit trimming would be much more acceptable.

I'd have to agree, if you look Miela's last set "Erbacea" she has a nice thin landing strip, which I'd think would be the happy medium for the fur lovers. He's a question for the fur lovers, have any of you asked the question:
What is the purpose of pubic hair? It isn't to keep your genitals warm, and it isn't necessarily a sign of adulthood (a 13 year girl probably has it). It's to trap odors, you know that lovely fishy smell. Primitive man didn't need to check her ID, as soon as she walked by and he got a whiff of that smell he knew it was club time. As any Biologist they'll tell you the same, hello pubic hair, hello fishy smell.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Not a happy medium, a landing strip!
In fact trying to shape the natural pattern of pubic hair results in an aesthetic degradation.
It isn't to keep your genitals warm? Why not? Not that that's the only reason it's there.
It's only to trap odors, you're saying? Nothing visual or tactile about it?
Come on, dude, you're view is kinda limited.
It's there for whatever reason we fancy. Including because it's erotic.
And btw the fishy smell can be there without pubic hair grown out.
Ever heard of bathing?
(Hint: it gets rid of that smell :-)

This guys just too easy to wind up. I bet he's never given a girl oral in his life.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

What does that have to do with anything?

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Oh btw, what's the youngest age of human motherhood on record? 10?
Not that she's an adult, but she is a mother.
Girls as young as 7 or 8 have pubic hair.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

I notice that a lot of people who are against natural pubic (and other body) hair are woefully uninformed :-)
Why doesn't that surprise me :-?

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

FYI: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precocious_puberty

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

It's far from fully grown out. You're pretty persnickety.
Natural beauty. I guess you'd go to Yosemite and want to trim the trees and arrange the rocks :-)

Other peoples opinions just bug the hell out of you, don't they? LOL! YOU are the very definition of persnickety! ;o)

"snobbish or having the aloof attitude of a snob. "

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

And mine bug the hell out of you, don't they :-?
On this particular point, yes indeed they do. It's me against the world :-)
And if that's bein' a snob, I'm happy to be one :-)
At least I have principles :-)

No...sorry...I'm just very amused by yours, and your self-righteous attitude. "Principles"? lol Don't we all...

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

My implication is that we don't all have principles -- at least ones I can detect :-)
Yep, on the point of body hair, damned right I'm self-righteous. But I think "righteous" is a better word. I am convinced it's for a good cause :-)

MY implication was that you don't have any more principles than anyone else here, and thank you for perfectly illustrating my point about your self-righteous attitude... ;o)

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

How would you know, Rock, about who has what principles?

Well... the same way YOU do, of course.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Well, as I said, I only know about mine :-)

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

I should amend that. I think there are people with principles here, in MetArt commentary. At least that I can detect. I don't detect them in everybody, though. Not that they're not there -- just that I don't see them.
And they tend to be pretty easy marks.
I would be glad for them to show me they have some, though.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

For those who are interested, there is pretty intense discussion further down the page about the principles or lack of them in those who rate a set like this very low because the model is unshaven. Warning -- if you're one of those people, you're not gonna like it :-)

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

2 -- love the hi-rez detail!
3 -- sexy. 4 -- good-lookin' girl :-) 6 -- straight up! :-)
12 -- sexy skin. 14 -- very attractive :-) 15 -- beautiful body :-)
18 -- winsome :-) 19 -- feminine hairs...
20-21 -- the hair is stirring... :-) 22 -- nice tease...
27 -- quite provocative :-) 32 -- very sexy.
Getting lost in her body with its lovely natural shapes and patterns. Her hair is not grown fully out obviously -- this set would lose another point or two if it were. No eyes for erotic beauty, those guys -- the MetArt Taliban :-)
Appreciate the quality photography as well. A. Iskan redeems himself :-)
48 -- a good-looking pussy! :-)
58 -- sorry, but I just gotta say ----
Eeewwww! A hairy pussy! Gross! Ga-rosse!! Please shave. You're hurtin' my eyes, and my brain!

Now you know that's a joke. I'm just makin' fun of all the manly dudes who have conniptions when a lady lets her hair grow :-)
That said, a fault of this set its that it's too much about her hairy pussy. Shot after repetitive shot of it. I'd like to see more of her face, and the rest of her.
61 -- thank you!
62 -- seems to be wearing contacts. I wouldn't call her hair blonde either. But she is sexy. Like the simplicity and the Union Jack... :-)
The bias on this site against unshaven is remarkable. Just note how this set rates against mediocrity scoring a full point or more higher.
Buncha dweebs here. Or would you prefer the term "wussies" :-?
64 -- very nice shot.
67 -- inconsistent photoshopping above her navel. You should just leave the hole. Too easy to forget to fill it in.
I like her bland gaze. Just sets off what she's presenting...
70 -- damn near beautiful :-) Like the lower leg... :-)
72 -- luv it :-) 73 -- vivre, baby! :-) 76 -- cute!
78 -- very seductive :-) Your body hair is very nice.
84 -- whatta girl! :-) 96 -- girlish! :-)
108 -- traveling to an English-speaking country, Eddison :-?
112 -- sexy -- varry sexy... :-) Traveling girls are always hot :-)
117-18 -- deadly combo!

And this "comment"(?) demonstrates your level of self-importance. Like we need to know what YOU think of each and every shot, and not just the set??
You really need to get over yourself Doug and use your eyes more than your fingers while here... Or continue to amuse me....the choice is yours.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

That's not each and every shot, for one. It's also written for people who are interested, including me. No one has to read it. Unless you want to be amused.
"Like we need to know" -- there you go again. Who is "we"?
Consider your own self-importance, Rock, before taking account of mine. It'll keep you out of more trouble.
And btw, are you taking over as editor here?

I wouldn't dream of taking your job...

More trouble is not a big concern for me. And self-importance is not an issue for me.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Since you're accusing me of it it must be an issue for you.
Rock, you comment like crazy too on this site, and have been very critical of me, among other people. Just bear that in mind before taking shots at me for doing the same.

Thank you, very much, Doug --

I believe you have made my point for me --

By the wisdom of the Ancient Greeks -- ALL THINGS IN MODERATION.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Emphasis on "ALL THINGS"... :-)

Nice to see a real woman and not shaved every day, she is gorgeous and now woman are not shaving like it was the 90's, would like to see more of her.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

No, unfortunately they are shaving like it was the 2010s!
Most of 'em still scared to death to reveal their bushes, etc.
Has a lot to do with mean men :-)
This gal looks great unshaven. I hope a few more brave girls take notice.

Instant favorite. I love the non-nude shots where her abundant pubes teasingly peak out from under her panties.

Ye Gods !!!

No download here -- !!

I don't save "Saskwatch" auditions~

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

I know you're trying to be funny, but that's the kinda comment we talkin' about here. "Saskwatch" -- really?
I think we know who the real monster is :-)

Sorry, Dude --

It was 3am and the view hit me like a brick. Having slept on it, I realize the comment was a bit over the top.

Diplomacy, however, would not have changed my personal opinion.

For those I have offended -- my apologies.

To which Pantheon do you plea?

This set is so incredibly personal, so shockingly intimate. I'm in love. This is truly a gift from Eddison, and I can barely handle it.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

She is calmly showing us stuff that is normally hidden. That's why the heightened sense of intimacy.

Eddison is quite so a beautiful girl with or with pubis hair. i dont care. i just want to see her many times more and a video too.

please shave everywhere

Does that include her head?

She is beautiful and I love the hair in the pubic area, I'm just not fond of all the hairy armpit part, shave the pits and you can leave the hairy pussy.

great job! again!
here a pussy with naturals colors (i hate photoshop!!)

  • rezz
  • 7 months ago:

She's perfect just the way she is.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Exactly so. She could let it grow out fully and be more perfect, if that's possible.

All new girls are welcome.
Welcome Eddison.
Still a little shy and diffident.
Eddison you are among friends, we will try our sympathy for you.

I do not have a passion for hair.
But you, not shaved, express a subtle eroticism and attractive.
And I tell you, you are "Bella".

Bravo Alex you've captured the way Eddison to express themselves naked.
Perfect ambience, great lighting.
A bikini a bit ugly.

Eddison back soon! (shaved or not shaved on but not trimmed).

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

I'm pretty much with you on the shaved, not shaved, but not trimmed aesthetic.
When the girls try to improve things by trimming, shaping etc all it does for me is remind me that nature knows best, nature is the immeasurably greater artist.
If they shave it all off at least it's all equal, and we can see the skin et al underneath.
And that can be a dynamic duo, presenting it in these 2 ways. As I've said, I'm surprised not more girls do this. Haven't they heard that variety is the spice of life?
That said, I'll take unshaven any day! :-)

Does that include arm pits doug? And legs? I can "tolerate" most body hair, but if I see legs that are hairier than mine, I'm down the pike...real quick like! When you say you'll take unshaven any day, I just wondered how far that goes for you.

Don't bother...I got my answer.

The hair was a major turn-off. Get a clean shave and try again.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

You must like being turned off! I notice you said the same thing on Kristel's latest set.

Eddison is a great new model. I'd like to see her either way.

Happy for you hair lovers but this ain't for me! I'm out of here.

She's gorgeous --

And her smile is positively delightful --

But the hair spoiled the whole thing.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Don't let that spoil your enjoyment.
Come on, it's perfectly natural, all women have it, it's there to be sexy, it signals fertility, it's very sensual.... :-)
We are mammals after all. Relatively hairless ones.
You ought to enjoy that little bit of animality :-)

You have to admit....she's very pretty. (Well you don't 'have to', but I'm sure you agree...;o)

Indeed! but that bristly midsection is a turn off for me.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

"bristly midsection"?
Time for a new monitor, hipshot :-)

Hair we go again!!! LOL The age-old hair debate... What fun!!
And of course someone has to drag religion into it...lmao!
This is a very pretty new model... I hope to see less of her in the future...;o) if you catch my drift...lol I haven't even looked at the set yet, but I hope papacito is NOT seeing what I fear he might be seeing...yet another reason to shave...

Well.... He IS correct (requires close scrutiny of hi-res image) but I was wrong...it has nothing to do with 'hair'. I'm with hipshot....RUN!!! (lol)


I just shot my coke across the room :))....and I haven't even seen the set yet.

LOL It's really not a bad set...she's a fox even with fur...lol
I think she'll shave eventually, or at least trim a bit, and I'll be happy to see it...;o)

I hope she's back again just the way she is. Don't touch the hair. You'll always have fans here and haters. Just ignore them.

And if you don't like hairy women just don't look at the set. As I said before, it's pretty obvious in the picture on the main page that she's hairy. Why do you look at the pictures then complain about them? Just pass by the set.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

They want to make a "political" point, and I can understand that, making them myself on occasion :-) But when you speak your mind do you really want to put its narrowness on display? A lot of it strikes me as flat-out nature-hating, if not woman-hating -- at the very least an unmanly squeamishness about body hair.
That's fine, whatever, just as long as MA doesn't get swayed too far by these folks. They already have it their way here by a huge preponderance -- I guess they're afraid of things evening out just a wee bit. The domino theory!
Let's hope so! :-)

Ladys and gentlemen --

That was an unpaid political announcement!

Please cast your vote.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

But you know, people giving a girl a 1 because she doesn't shave -- jeezuz! How lame. As if that's all there is to her and the set. I'm afraid to say it shows these folks have got a major problem that goes well beyond hairy MetArt girls... :-)

LOL You da man doug! You da man...

Landing strip, bush, fine. Hairy pits, not so much. Hairy legs, ugh no.

Eddison is very pretty,and I think she will be a good model in future sets as well. si give her s 10 for potential

Since this young lady is Ukrainian I am surprised that Sailor hasn't staked his claim and come to her defense against the conformist cabal. To use an American expression the complaints her just seem so Bush League. Look at the positive, Alex left photoshop at home today. It appears that this young lady is what she appears to be, that is comfortable with herself being au naturale. For once her "bush" doesn't seem to be a statement but rather just as she is. Not the waxed legs, undercarriage, and pits with "presentation" "maicured" bush. But simply her natural self. So now is she the new "poster" girl for natural, lets wait and see if next time alters her appearance. I hope not we have room for as the french say, la difference.


Yes... "French" is what I call this look...;o)

Exactly why I don't like french women!

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

You're a great generalizer, hipshot :-)

Right. There IS the occasional exception, but they're few and far between.

VERY far between !

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

So are you two :-)

Don't feel bad doug....I think one guy agrees with you....

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

So you're proud to paint French women with that broad a brush of dislike, and for a bigoted and mistaken reason at that?

LOL If you say so.

Well at the least this one looks clean!

With that little exception that papacito mentioned...

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

You guys shave with too broad a razor, so to speak!
I confess I haven't looked closely at this set yet, but I am concerned that people are downing it just because of the hair. Which, to be poetic, isn't fair. However, I hope Met takes note of the interest it generates, as do many hairy sets -- they tend to get a lot of comments, a lot of votes. And that is because they are interesting -- a quality we shouldn't take for granted on this site.
You hair haters ought to be glad for some variety -- otherwise you'd die of boredom and not even know it :-)
On this site it can indeed be a shock to see a woman with natural body hair. But don't confuse the shock with its erotic appeal. You may find it's like getting used to the water -- after awhile it's just fine :-)

"Shock" don't half cover it mate!

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

She's got a nice amount of hair but nothing remotely "mannish" in my opinion. She's perfectly feminine.
Eyebrows, head hair -- maybe these aren't "sexual" and thus don't cause such a ruckus with some members of the opposite sex.
Yes, body hair is androgenic -- it's brought about by male hormones -- but all women have it. It has been selected for in an evolutionary sense. It's there because men are attracted to it.
Not all men! But I think you and other guys who freak about it should keep these facts in mind.
Bet they'd enhance your appreciation of the total woman.

LMFAO!!! "It's there because men are attracted to it"!!???

Doug... That is by far the funniest goddamn thing you have EVER said!! Thanks for the hilarity!! roflmao!!

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

What's so funny about that statement?

If you actually believe that, any explanation would fall on deaf ears.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

That's a cop-out, Rock.

LOL Very....poetic doug. But we're not ALL "haters", we just have a "preference"... And at some point, waaay back in time, I saw something online that "shocked" me for the last time. Nothing Met could serve up would be shocking to very many of us... Especially any beautiful young woman who likes her body hair intact. And you're right.....we do talk about this a lot lol I also prefer smaller tits, but have plenty of favorites that are medium and large breasted, because just like the hair issue, my "preferences" can be very "flexible" depending on several other factors, most of all, the face...hands down number one! If the face has no appeal to me, I usually don't go any further. I believe men have argued this issue of body hair since the first daring woman did it...probably hundreds of years ago. Back to Hiway from Hell....peace ;o)

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Or you could say Hiway to Hell, I guess...:-)

I don't like to see this apparently automatic rejection of a girl because she lets her body hair grow. You may or may not like somebody, but just because her body isn't shaved you spew nasty things about her? Talk about uncool. Some are so mean you'd think they were shocked like little kids to discover that women have hair on their bodies. But do they get rid of their body hair like they demand she does? I certainly hope so! :-) Otherwise what does it say about their humanity?

Hiway thru Hell... it's a great show on TWC...
I hope you weren't saying that "I" spewed anything nasty about this girl doug... The fact is this girl is not entirely unattractive to me. Her hair isn't that thick, and isn't hiding anything from my hungry eyes. And she's very pretty, and as I've said before, the face is no.1 to me. Genital (and leg) shaving is a preference for me, not a demand. (well....except the legs...that's kind of a demand...)

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Not about this girl! :-)

Usually I prefer shaven legs but there have been times when I was unexpectedly turned on by hairy ones. Again, it's all about the combination of girlishness and womanhood -- i.e. fertility. And body hair is a sign of that...
That's why it's arousing...

Apart from that, I think a woman's leg hair can be aesthetic too. But less likely when she's clothed. A lot of times a naked woman's unshaven body hair looks better, because you see how it goes with everything else.
Typical women's clothes are designed with a "shaven" woman in mind, so it's little wonder many find hairy armpits and legs jarring.

BTW, I'm thinking of women in person as I say these things. In 2-D photos I guess a little imagination is required. At times. Depends on the girl... :-)

I have to agree that the overall picture is the defining light by which I go. There are a few that look fine with normal hair but it depends on the model how much I am willing to accept. But the general primes I go by is less is better and this pretty much applies to breasts and labia as well. I hate large breasts especially large aureole and large labia can spoil an otherwise perfect girl. However I realize that those are my personal preferences and Met has to try to satisfy everyone.

I can't believe I blew that!! "Hiway THRU Hell"!! (lmao!)

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Sounds scenic! :-)

Yes, one of the things I do like about this site are all the girls with natural, "unenhanced" breasts. Bigger ain't necessarily better, even if that's un-American to say :-)

It's very scenic...British Columbia.

On this we can agree! And it probably IS "un-American" to say that to SOME guys! And I think there's no 'necessarily' about it...bigger is NOT better!!

Doug, I agree... natural is EVERYTHING as far as breasts are concerned.
I have tons of favorites with small breasts... Look at Lorena for example. Everyone loves her, and she ROCKS the small breasts.
I have many favorites who rock the large breasts as well. But if they look fake, I just lose interest. Even if the rest is exquisite (including the face).
Having said so, I know I've talked to some guys who actually LIKE fakes. I don't understand that, and I hope I never do. But I have heard it.
Fortunately, this does not seem to be the case with "K" and those who choose which sets to buy...

Breast enhancement is a Metart no no and one of the best ones as far as I am concerned.

As far as I am concerned Brest enhancement is an oxymoron. The two words should never be used in the same sentence! God gave girls what they have and there is no way man can enhance his work. for some big is the holy grail, for others small is. For me small and firm rules

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Interesting that some guys like that. That is certainly good news for girls who choose to go that route (which I suppose begins because they want guys to like them more :-)
I would be concerned about what it would do to my health down the line. The idea of pumping them up artificially -- ¡no gracias! Smaller breasts to me connote youth -- they tend to get bigger, and saggier, with age, especially after having a child.
So what's the rush girls? Keep your sleek little boobs as long as possible! Plenty of guys appreciate them, believe it or not :-)

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Right on! :-)

What a glorious woman. Beautiful natural pussy. Gorgeous set all around. AHH, the memories it brings back.

Love her, love the hair! Great photo set. Great way to start the day.

Eddison is a stunning natural beauty - lets have lots more sets of her please.


Great first set Eddison. I like that you kept everything natural, including your legs. I think my bush loving brethren are trying to convert me. Lol. Is it me or have we had more natural models lately? Maybe K is finally listening to Bush lovers. Thank you Eddison and Alex.

It does seem that MA has been running more sets of women with hair lately. Could be several things:
1) MA is responding to the positive feedback they get when they run a "natural" set
2) More women are growing lately/fewer are shaving, so MA is getting more sets with natural hair
I have heard several photographers explain that they leave it up to their models whether or not to shave. It could be that the fad is dying out.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Just as bush-lovers have been appalled by the taking over of shaved, shaved-lovers are gonna be appalled by the reemergence of not-shaved. Call it the wheel of time?
I'd like to see a little more liberality with legs and underarms as well. Some lucky girls can really pull that look off. But I applaud any woman with the guts to buck the highly self-serving "establishment" :-)

I won't be appalled doug...I'll just be a'gone if that tips too far in the hair direction...;o) As, I'm sure, most 'here' would.

Please! ENOUGH with the hair already! Get your models to shave or let them go to some other website.


LMAO!! Did somebody tell you that this is a "hairless" site??

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Why don't you just go to another set? Be a lot simpler :-)

You may have noticed there are people here who like women's body hair. And who said it's not allowed on MA?

Yes, there are some of you and you're quite vocal. But we've also noticed the rating for this set - and others like it.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

What are doing here then -- just to vote the set down?

That's why the ratings are a farce.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

I get so mad I drop words!
It's very obvious people go to "hairy" sets just to complain and vote then down.
As if they're afraid hair is going to take over their lives :-)
How would they like it if people went to "shaved" sets and did the same thing?
That's why I advise MetArt not to put much stock in the ratings. Take more notice of actual comments, and the amount of interest a set generates.
If you must have ratings, think up a system that is more fair.

I'm confused. Only high ratings and positive comments should count? That would make them both useless. Yeah, I came here to "vote the set down" because it's not something I'm interested in seeing. What's wrong with that? It's no different from giving high ratings to my favorite models. (Also came in because I knew the comments would be interesting.)

fwiw, I'd love to see Eddison shaved. She's too cute to be relegated to being a fetish model.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

I think it depends on just how low a rating is given because of the hair. I won't ask you what you gave it, but I believe some people give "hairy" sets the lowest possible rating, just because of the hair.
Which I would find despicable.
Liking women's body hair is not a fetish, and girls who show it here are not "fetish" models. Except perhaps in your mind...
Shaved was not all that long ago considered kinky, fetishistic. I think we'd best not use that term -- you ought to look up what it actually means.

Well, "liking women's body hair" can be a fetish, but "niche model" was the term I was really looking for. Temporary brain fart.

I didn't go as low as possible in my rating (as I wrote, I think Eddison is quite cute and enjoyed the pix where her hairy bits aren't visible) but if you have no use for a photo set, a rating of "1" is hardly "despicable", just honest.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

I should make my response a little clearer about giving a set a 1. No, I do not believe giving it a 1 because you are against unshaven body hair is "honest." It is rather dishonest, extremely small-minded, and cowardly to boot. If that's all it takes in your book to be honest, you're setting a dangerously low bar. They can rate it anywhere from 10 to 1, and they give it a 1? As if there's no other consideration? I'd like to see what they rate a 9 or a 10. But I think I get some idea, looking at some of the sets that out-rate this one and others where the woman doesn't shave.
One word comes to mind about those sets: pathetic.
See my "review" above for what I think of these people. Dweebs, wusses, jerks, -- well, I guess I'm repeating myself unnecessarily. But no, not honest people. That implies way too much integrity, way too generous a mind, and far too much intelligence.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Well, I guess anything could be a fetish then!
Niche model...what I'd like to see are models feeling they can present themselves unshaven without fear of nasty rejection. Sort of like a man would.
As it is "unshaven" girls do get lots of love here -- all they gotta do is read comments.
I'm glad to hear you're a more responsible naysayer, anyway!
I won't go into specifics, but there are sets here that would easily rate in the high 8s if not for the hair. The reason they're in the low 8s or below is because some jerks give them a 1 -- because of the hair.
Really, now -- is human body hair all that awful?
Apparently to some. And that is pathetic.
"No use" for a set they rate a 1? Obviously they have plenty of use for it, in order to make their statement. Otherwise they wouldn't bother.
I'd like them to show more class, even if it's in private.

LOL Calm down doug... I'm sure the 'powers that be' know that the ratings can be skewed. And you should be used to people "spewing nasty things" about body hair...;o) Chillaxxx..

Not a fan of poop in the anus

Either clean your glasses or your computer screen.

Sorry arkie, Papacito is exactly right. Look again.

Hello All,

I think what you are seeing is a naturally unbleached anus. This may come as a surprise but just like female genitals, everyone has a different tint. More modern ladies prefer to get their anus bleached while others think its silly. I can promise you models (especially a brand new one) will be tip top hygienically before photographing nude. I hope this helps!

Bleaching is not unknown, at least to most of us, but "skin tone and/or freckles" is entirely different from "extraneous debris" which is barely visible here, but which is clearly present. As I said before, close scrutiny (of image no.55) will reveal the truth.
I personally don't look 'this' close at the photos, I'm simply defending a comment that brought up the subject of hygiene and that I personally confirmed. This is not the first time this has come up either. A very similar conversation took place on Irina J's last set... Sometimes a model will show up 'not entirely clean' and someone will notice, and some will be more noticeable than others. "It goes with the territory".

K, you should know by now that some of the members appear to live to find "flaws". And once they think they have, they never let it go. As I posted earlier not only is the model naturale but the photo themselves appear to be "as shot" no photoshop "enhabcement". Thus even the skin tone is actual based on the lighting used. I do commend you for jumping in for this young lady and trying to make sense to these dullards. I hope we see more of literally ALL of this beautiful girl. Thanks.

"Dullards"? I commend YOU for starting the name calling...
And I would use your eyes before you use your mouth.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

For goodness sake -- it's an anus! You can't expect it to be totally clean all the time. I mean, is yours :-?

Did somebody say it comes with the territory -- sorta like hair...Oh, I guess we better not go there :-)

Maybe people who are having such a problem with these facts of life should try another pastime?

Right on, Doug.
I daresay a few of the guys complaining about what might or might not be extraneous "debris" have dingleberries of their own ~ hanging from their own unshaven anus regions.

WHOA!! "Right on Doug"!? First of all...HELL YES! I CAN expect it to be clean on a model that poses for "erotic photographs"..."ALL THE TIME"! And whether or not MINE is, is so irrelevent as to be comical...and a bit creepy. But for your edification, I do NOT walk around with a dirty ass, and can only assume at this point that YOU do and you think it's normal.....yikes!!! I daresay THIS line of conversation is over for me.


Thanks for making me laugh, Rock, even though I disagree with you on this particular point. Frequently I agree with you, and most of the time when I disagree, I respect your forthrightness.

So please understand I have nothing but respect for you personally.
I was NOT singling you out personally with my snarky remark about members' own dingleberries on their own less-than hygienic fundaments.

The reason I made that ~ admittedly ~ snarky remark is that it floors me how easily members make denigrating comments regarding the models' choices (or in this case grooming) that reveals that their standards for female attractiveness are very very exacting when they themselves are probably diamonds in the rough, to be charitable.

We all have flaws, and many of us make the choice to wear tattoos and piercings, and most of us (males I am speaking of now) do not shave our own private regions.

But let a model have a tattoo, or have piercings, or go unshaven ~ and whoo! the fit hits the shan so to speak.

It just seems double standard to me.

As for the grooming of the anal region issue...

There have been, counting this particular set, two sets in the last several months where members have raised that issue.

Two sets out of how many where the model has visibly less than perfect grooming?

Complaining about that seems a bit of a waste of time. Especially because by far most of the sets show impeccably groomed young ladies.

If you recall, it wasn't me that mentioned it to begin with. I've learned to live with it or just ignore it if it's noticeable. I simply came to the defense of the person that DID mention it, because it looked like everyone was going to unload on the guy for being honest and making an honest observation. And then K tried to explain it away as "skin tone". I feel that if the models are offended by such comments, they'll make more of an effort to show up "camera ready".

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

How do you know some of this doesn't happen during the shooting?
I see what people are talking about and you talk about nitpicking.
Do they say anything else about her? Kinda shows you where their heads are at. It's all part of what I find disgusting about people who come to this site and talk and vote in very mean ways. So maybe I return the fire -- they deserve it :-)

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

You know, fer_realz, a lot of these comments say far more about the commentator than the commented on... :-)

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Oh yes, but accidents will happen! :-)

Think it's a good idea to tolerate it when a little normal run-off occurs.

At least not to have a cow about it, or point it out gleefully.

Put yourself in the place of the model.

She is human, too.

And kind of under a microscope here...

As I've said, I'll take it over photoshopping any day :-)

Ha! The double-post gremlin got me again... twice in one night (so far)!

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

That's OK -- I was having a bad-typing day myself :-(

Right on, Doug.
I daresay a few of the guys complaining about what might or might not be extraneous "debris" have dingleberries of their own ~ hanging from their own unshaven anus regions.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

What goes around comes around and sticks to butts :-)

Thanks for being awesome, Doug. This lovely woman has shared something special with us and she deserves more respect.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

I agree, looking at her more closely. You really get the sense that she is giving us a treat.
Very nice of her! :-)

Fur burger...YUMMO!!!

  • Gary
  • 7 months ago:

Eddison is ultra hot especially with her unshaven body! This set is super erotic as well as beautiful, and she has a great attitude. Well done by model and photographer! More unshaven models and sets please.

Not a fan of the bush.

I think this is a decent set of an attractive young woman. Eddison has a nice figure and shows it well. I hope she comes back again.

Her bio says "not trimmed" but it is trimmed in length only and not extents. I don't mind her body hair as it is kept neat, not unruly and visually obscuring. Actually, it looks good on her and nice to see some variety in that department.

Frankly, do not care who dislikes this natural model. Maybe it is just something different for a while. If they were all the same it would be very boring. For me she is GREAT. Thank you.

Agreed! two thumbs up

Good to see an attractive new model, not afraid to let her hair grow, the pits, legs, bush all very attractive on this fine young lady. In the few shots where she smile, her whole face lights up and greatly changes the dynamics of the picture. Keep the sets coming, stay natural Eddison not only because it looks great on you, but because it sets you apart from the 98% shaved models. Love it.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

It's so great to see a young woman daring to be different...


You can tell by her profile pic that she's natural, why even open the set to look if you don't like it?

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

That's a shame! :-)

Thank goodness God designed razors as well. Just my opinion. Subtle opinion.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

No, God did not design razors. Blame man for that :-)


"Blame"?? Not sure about anyone else, but I'm pretty thankful for razors! They're good for shaving more things than pussy!

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:


I don't want to blaspheme :-)

Apparently you don't want to make sense either.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

This is a little old, but look up the word "blame" in the dictionary cited above.
I did not want to assign the responsibility for razors and shaving to "God." That's all. It's a theological argument to be sure :-) Some people will say everything is because of God. Others won't :-)

YEAH...! A all natural woman... This is how God designed women,- Great artist he is... More of this please..!

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Great artist she is... :-?

I find Eddison to be a very attractive young lady.

Thank you to Eddison, Alex, and K for this very nice first of many visits (I hope).

I love the full on womanly bush, a little trimming may be in order and I offer my services)). Welcome and great debut. More please.


  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

Haven't looked at this whole set yet, but it sure is refreshing to see what I have. An unshaven girl! Even her legs are unshaven. But they look good. She's kinda cute. And Alex Iskan of all people is the photographer!
Will wonders never cease?!
Thank you :-)

I knew you'd like this set, Doug.

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

I do have a weakness for body hair... :-)

there's a certain delicious innocence in a girl with natural pubic hair

  • a2m2
  • 7 months ago:


O so this what a natural women looks like....I do like them this! I've been seeing them all fully shaved so much i was starting to think thats how they are made now...

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

LOL! But at least you're open-minded about it! Some of these guys are apparently still flailing away in deep shock :-)

Haha! I'm more then just open minded about it. I love this natural look!!!

It is surprising what a hot topic the hair or lack of hair is. It seems if your not a fan of the natural hairy look you could easily skip these sets rather then criticize the model, the photographer, and/or the website for showing a female in their natural form... There are plenty of sets with shaved models for those not into this look, So why come here and start an argument? To me, the female body is beautiful in it's natural state, as well as shaved. I dread the day that all women look the same. If we only had one style and not the other, the lack of variety could get monotonous...

  • Doug
  • 7 months ago:

The question is why don't some skip it? But I'd rather that they speak here than silently sabotage the set and skulk away. It does seem odd, doesn't it, that somebody could have such a problem with women's body hair? I guess somewhere down the line they got twisted, and seek to avenge their pain. Whatever -- they have a certain right to. Too bad some lovely girls have to pay the price for it.
I think these hair-haters (by extension possibly women-haters) pay a higher price, though.

When girls shave they take away from their individuality. Everybody's body hair is different, and when you get rid of it, you're removing a clear distinguishing feature. At least in a scene where almost everyone gets rid of it. So indeed I find MA's models largely boring, not worth more than a confirmatory glance. Novelty, difference catch our eye -- Eddison caught my eye :-)_
My favorite model Kristel shows herself both completely shaved and completely unshaved (legs not included), and I find the difference very exciting. Sometimes she lets things get stubbly -- more fascinating variation :-)
So girls, have the sensible courage to at least mix things up. Do you really have to be ruled by a very mean world of razors and wax that pretends to be your friend?
No. Believe it or not :-)

Access The Full Set Of 120 Images By Joining MetArt Today!