English

This gallery contains 119 images @ 24 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Comments

ABSOLUTE CRAPPY GALLERY, NEVER UNDERSTOOD WHY "SHOOTERS" FELT THE NEED TO TAKE A MODEL WITH BEAUTIFUL HAIR AND SCREW IT ALL UP BY GETTING IT WET. A BEAUTIFUL MODEL WITH WET HAIR BECOMES JUST A WOMAN WITH WET HAIR, A PLAIN LOOKING WOMAN WHO HAS BEAUTIFUL HAIR IMPROVES HER LOOKS. WHEN YOU HAVE A CLEAN, FRESH, GIRL NEXT DOOR BEAUTY LIKE EMILY YOU DON'T WASTE SHOOTS WITH CRAP LIKE THIS, TOO BAD.

I'd dive into that tub head first!!!

Mirror Mirror On The Wall, Who's The FAIREST of them ALL?

EMILY BLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

Cute as my Persian silver shaded chinchilla ("Lucy")!

EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

i prefer to see Emily's body not the suds

i prefer to see Emily's body not the suds

Your "Jimmy Two Times" impersonation?

THINGS I LOVE ABOUT THIS SET: A model who blends cuteness with hotness in dangerous proportions; breasts that must be the envy of the whole planet; lovely soft light; playful, teasing eroticism; big, gorgeous eyes; intoxicating fair flesh; the fantasies it inspires; one sweeeeet bum; 93,97,98; 115,117,118; fun, frothy idea!

PERSONALLY I MIGHT ADD: they drying off and slipping into something lacy ...

I prefer the girls AFTER their bath...;o)

But I have to say, for having her in a tub of bubbles, he got several great shots of her yumminess... Best tub set in quite a while! I might even have to keep it!! :oO

  • fred
  • 5 months ago:

Best boobs on Met. Works of art!

  • H WU
  • 5 months ago:

This set is not bad but Emily is better off without the soaps and suds.She belongs inside a bedroom.

Agreed

There should be some rule in the Met-Art bylaws that requires every model to have at least one shower and/or bath set.

Another side of Emily viewed by Goncharov:-) Photoshop or not, shaved or not, some comments apart... the most beautiful thing would be to stay with this Angel in this bath together and caress Her all over on the notes of the Song "Forever and for always" by Shania Twain:-):-):-) Kiss kiss Emily...

This set definitely focuses more on Emily's bountiful cuteness and adorableness. Who could resist smiling at seeing Emily in a tub covered with suds? I prefer to see Emily's erotic side, but this is a delightful change of pace, even though it is getting a very low score because of the lack of eroticism. A pity.

Whoops, scratch that "very low score" statement, the cavalry has arrived to save the day. ( ;
I'm happy for Emily, she deserves nothing but 10s.

What the fuck is up with that disgusting, dirty bathwater?! Ruins the set, total turn off.

Emily,BOOOM!!!


Amazing



The seller

Amen, brother. Brevity is the soul of tits.

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

The photoshop maestro is back in the very first image. I jumped to 6 and found one even more egregious. ¡No más, gracias!
But you have to wonder why Emily would allow her body to be defaced in this fashion.

Doug could you point out the photoshop? I'm missing it

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Take a look at her mons in those 2 images. The stubble has been painted over.
Months ago I got into big trouble for having the temerity to point out this photog's airbrushing of Emily -- I've had a field day ever since.*
Apparently he believes no one looks at images at 100% with a decent display, or no one cares that he whitewashes pubic hair, which I consider not an insignificant detail.
Even if it has been shaven, he ought to respect that she didn't pluck it, or otherwise destroy it, but merely shaved it, maybe so she could grow it if she chose.
Because she has some sense of bodily integrity.
These photogs sure don't when it comes to their models.

*not of course just with Goncharov

Pointing it out won't help. Doug sees things that no one else can...

I've tried several times.

But he's ever diligent ;o)

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

Need new glasses!
Either that or I'm the only one who looks critically at images, while everybody else happily laps up whatever they're served :-)

I do as a matter of fact...lol But not to see what your talking about, I need them to see you "TALKING"!! Things get real blurry after midnight!! And we lap it up BECAUSE we don't look at them "critically"! Try squinting as you look at them, like you're looking through the cracks in a door....;o)

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

For sure you guys don't look at them critically! :-))
That's one reason why what I say is such a pain! :-))))

I'm very used to looking at hi-rez images critically, so I really don't think anything of it -- I've been shocked to see how unusual my way of looking at them is -- at least judging by the commentary here.

The vast majority of MA viewers do not comment, and I'd guess a majority don't even vote, so I have a feeling there are other critical viewers...

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

You're right, though -- there are other ways of looking at these sets. As Peeping Toms -- great idea, even if you don't get all the details! :-)))
However, I see no reason to have to be a Peeping Tom here :-)
I'm looking for realistic details that I can stare at in the comfort and safety of my home! :-)
Thus I get p.o.-ed by photoshopping.

She no doubt has little if anything to say about it...I suspect...

  • Doug
  • 5 months ago:

I disagree -- I think if she spoke up it would matter.

  • ergo
  • 5 months ago:

without soap suds 116, 117 and 118 would have been even more delicious than they are now .




Access The Full Set Of 119 Images By Joining MetArt Today!
CLICK for FREE ACCESS