English

This gallery contains 125 images @ 21 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Comments

I LOVE YOU MORE THAN YOU CAN IMAGE

I love you more than you can image

best on MA!

Erica is gorgeous,and OMG I love her beautiful smooth pussy!

Please,MA manager,bring back the thumbs down switch.There have been agitators before,remember Rockhard,against whom I used to fight back bravely.
Then,there was a way to show your intense dissapointment.Now thas is impossible.I´m a hair lover,that´s the way women turn me on more intensely,pubic hair,hairy underarm,possibly because the vast majority of
the girls I´ve loved showed that appearance and that strongly rewires my
brain´s circuits of pleasure,but the truth is that shaved turns me on too.I´m a fanatic of girls in any way.
This fórum is now monopolized by a group of friends and the topic is always the same.Use Whatsapp instead.

Bring back the thumbs down switch!

The seller

Rockhard is still among us, my friend.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I can attest to that! :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I don't know whether to up-thumb or down-thumb you (if there were a down-thumb :-)

But as I was just saying, as a hair-lover I'd luv to see all these girls both ways -- sadly, in almost every case you can only see them one way...

The "industry" way -- the uniform of denuded :-(

It's that way or the highway for these poor chicks, victims as we all are of the Shave-a-saurus :-(((

Last 3 days: Ardelia, Yarina, Milena D, Mila I, Semmi, Loretta A & Erica B. Ukraine Forever! I'd man the barricades with any or all of them. Mila may have my brass knuckles to fight back in style. Vlad the KGB guy better look out! -- tho I totally understand why he wants to smother Ukraine in the dead embrace of Mother Russia. IT'S THE UKRAINIAN WOMEN!!!

Maybe that's where Sailor went, to join in the fight to defend the Ukraine women???

OMG Ulysses, I can't believe I never figured it out until you pointed it out ~ but it's so obvious, isn't it? Vlad doesn't really want Ukraine... he wants its treasure!

Well,I for one am content with the glorious eye-candy spread for our delight by Erica and Matiss. I don't feel the need to argue about it either. I rest content with giving a 10++++ to both

Hi, my name's Doug. Bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush bush. The end.

:-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Call it setting another bush-fire! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Oh and btw applaud the originality of Checkers' comment you dolts :-)))

Wow, Erica you look marvelous! You caused quite a stir among some of the commentators.
A shout out to MA manager, thank you for the long legged beauties today; 3 out of 4 are 5'9"-5'10"! Love those beautiful long legs...

WOW, that is one sweet juicy vigina! Erica, you are one wonderful sexy lady. Could we have another set tomorrow?

I would like to thank the following members:

bibblefuss
hipshot131
RedPilot
P_Browning
fer-realz

The thanks is for your efforts in "winding-up" the "Neanderthal" for today.

SPECIAL THANX goes to "RJinCO" for going 15 rounds with him.

If we all do "our bit" it will keep him occupied for most of his day, and thereby keep society safe for the open-minded.

This was an un-paid, non-political, message brought to you by C.A.N.B. (Conspiracy Against Neanderthal Brick-heads)

Lol...guilty as charged!

I'm not sure what's happened to Doug lately, but it seems as though everything gets him "wound-up".
I didn't even bring up the "usual" subject that does it.....all I did was mention the recent popularity of Matiss' models and......

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Well you apparently haven't been around to know what's been goin' on! :-))

We're just taking this to the next level, sensing progress :-))

Now, if they really wanna distract me, put up a long-overdo KL set! :))

Krissy, please cooperate! :-)))))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Ever read a book called "1984"?
Where black is white, up is down, closed is open?
War is peace :-?

I do appreciate your humor tho Dread :-)

BTW, despite how it may seem to you, Neanderthals went extinct some time back, replaced by the hair-loving homo sapiens, of which I among others am one :-)))

I know that's tuff to believe, but sometimes truth is stranger than fiction :-)

Actually, guess what they've been finding lately, now that DNA and mitochondrial DNA analysis is getting more sophisticated, Doug...
It turns out, the Neanderthals didn't "just" go extinct, and they were not entirely eradicated by Homo Sapiens...
The two races actually interbred! No shit.
Apparently, they were not so different that they could not interbreed. I don't just mean have sex, I mean actually have offspring. Apparently nowadays there are people who carry Neanderthal DNA and traits.... no joke.
Fascinating, huh?

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I gotta Wiki that one! :-)

It sure would explain a lot, wouldn't it! :-)

In the meantime please keep this info away from Dread! :)))





The Neanderthal :-)

Dread already knew about it.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Well, Dread, how much Neanderthal do you figure you got in ya :-?

I would say maybe in some of that repressed part cryin' unheard for hair! :-))

Maybe I have less, and that's why I'm seeking a little of the lost primitive stuff elsewhere :-)*

Ya never know till ya does the test :-))


*not that KL is Neanderthal! :-)

Doug, yes what fer_realz said (and Dreadnought confirmed) has been proven through DNA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Neanderthal's actually are walking among us (I might even find out I'm one myself!).

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Not exactly Browning! :-)

They're still extinct :-)

But: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_human_admixture_with_modern_humans

Apparently they live on in 1-to-4% of our genes... :-)

Wikipedia is not always the most accurate (or more importantly) scientific source to quote. Many of their articles are disputed and/or incomplete.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm not doubting your claim per se, but I'll need to research Neanderthal DNA/Homo Sapien DNA and read the findings from several other sources to see how they compare with what's on Wikipedia.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I'd tend to think that article more believable than the notion Neanderthals walk among us! :-)))

No, but absolutely, it's just a place to start.

People who know are supposed to correct Wiki, so hopefully that happens eventually.

I've got a pet error in mind I wish I could have corrected on the spot... :-)

Can I join!

hipshot -- !!

Look at the list -- you're #2 in the brigade!

That makes you a charter member, my man.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Oh you really do need his help bad dude! :-))))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Look at them desperate thumbs!

Hipshot, saaave us! Pleeeeze! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

He's the guy who instigated it and then took off! :-)))

It is my pleasure to see lovely Erica again.

Thanks to both Erica and Matiss.

❤ the pink: lips, nipples, pussy!

Too many comments to read, who has the time? Erica gets my vote with her wonderful juices flowing. I'm a sucker for that every time. Reminds me of REAL sex, not just debating on poses or lighting or logistics like that.

Sorry, no...I don't need you to tell me what to ask myself...

My preference is not going to change...

BTW---can anyone here tell me what my preference for pussy is?...no, they can't... And likely no one cares either ...that's the point

hey RJ - Enjoy the cool day and watch out for the thunderstorms this afternoon.

Will do...and I'll do do my best to avoid The Troll going forward.

Erica is certainly very beautiful, but I'm not as fond of this set as I am her other ones.
This set is a little too "staged" and not near as spontaneous as her other sets.
IMO, Erica just doesn't look as natural.....and I'm not crazy about the fake scenery behind her either.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll give Erica a 10, but Matiss only a 7 on this one (and he/she is usually one of my favorite artists).

Nice to see you back! We need more calming voices around here!

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Since you're not providing any calm :-)))

Very much so. I enjoyed Browning's comments before, also glad to see him back.

Thank you also kilroy, the feeling is mutual.

Thank you hipshot131.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Mutual-admiration society, or conspiracy :-? :-))

Are you a "Conspiracy Theorist" Doug?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is no conspiracy against you, it's really simple.....your tastes are in the minority on this site.
There's nothing wrong with that other than you'll most likely never be happy with MA's content or rating system.

The entire argument, whether it's hair/shaven or MA's ranking system, is futile.
You're not going to change anyone's mind, and no one is going to change yours.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Are you that sure Mr Browning :-?

I'm not trying to change minds. I'm trying to get more diverse content on this site.

If that involves changing or broadening minds, so be it. But it's not the end; it's (one of) the means :-)

I thinks it might be more of a case where "the squeaky wheel gets the grease".
It could very well be you've been so "vocal" that maybe "K" is just trying to quiet you for a moment or two ;))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

That could be, but I've been trying to tell her I'm far from alone in wanting to see more of it on this site.
She can't access it. It's not there. The industry is that uniform, that tightly bound by conformity.
So when we do get a chance to see a new girl such as Eddison (note the mannish name :-) or Victoriya they need all the protection and encouragement they can get.
I realize that the majority on this site have no interest in the diversity I'm talking about -- and this site is K's bailiwick.
But if MA wants to grow, I'd think moving towards, pushing for more diversity would be in its interest.

Funny, I was pleasantly surprised by this set. Erica isn't among my favorites, but she did a great job in this set. I like her attitude and expressions. She looks like she's at home and enjoying herself... ( :

Say, Browning, now that you're back in the commenting community, just what was it you told me yesterday about Matiss models... ? ( :

I just missed your post fer_realz....check my comment right above yours:)

What fer_realz and I discussed was the fact that Matiss' models currently are ranked as follows;

#1 Erica B
#2 Izabel A
#3 Mila M
#4 Marta E
and at #6 Violla A

The #5 ranking is currently held by Lily C (the only model keeping Matiss from sweeping the top 5 spots in Met Art's Global ranking page).

As of my typing, Matiss' models have in fact swept #1-#5.
Great job Matiss for finding such beautiful women, and most importantly, for bringing them to us through your photography.

Pretty impressive...

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Not :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Do you put any stock in those rankings? And if so, I'd be curious to know why.
As you may know, I hate the model rankings :-) I think they're a disgrace.
But anyway... :-))

I don't see them as precise or scientific by any means. We have a diverse looking set of models here and we all have different preferences. There's no one single way to weigh all those preferences and say which is more representative or superior to all others.
However, I do think the rankings can be taken as a rough guide of a model's popularity or a photographer's popularity at any one moment in time. Not a precise guide, a rough one.
When you see one photographer dominating the top of the rankings, I take it to mean he's doing SOMETHING (or some things) right. There's no way of knowing exactly what that thing is, but... I see it as an indication of interest to me.

Thank you fer_realz!

The rankings show model popularity among ALL Met Art members.
It by no means shows MY RANKING, but I accept that MY FAVORITE is not EVERYONES FAVORITE.
Can the totals be somewhat skewed?.....sure, but that will eventually even itself out as everyone votes "up" their favorite and "down" the ones who are not.

I personally could care less if my favorite is (or isn't) in the top 150 (I'm happy she is for HER SAKE).
Why would I, or why should I, care what anyone else thinks of the woman I like best?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes Doug, I believe the voting system is probably as good as anyone can expect.
No....it isn't perfect, but it would be foolish to think it was possible to satisfy everyone anyway.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Not "all" -- only those with the temerity to vote :-)))
And why do they vote as they do?
I think a deconstruction of that would be very revealing.

"...probably as good as anyone can expect"....
IOW, lousy. Would need a ton of work to have any real cred :-)

All the sites think they have to tho. So maybe that's the real reason -- me-too-ism :-)

BTW, Doug....your girl is currently at #100 which (considering there are several thousand models on Met Art) I'd say is quite good.
I'm guessing you'd rank her higher (as would many other people).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also, since your favorite isn't as active as some of the more recently added models, I'd say that she is doing very well in the "popularity department"

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Her ranking, which has been in that area since I've been here, is one of the reasons I hate the rankings. It's what started my loathing of them, and my looks into them, to see WTF was wrong :-)
Someday I'll write a book about it :-)
Suffice it to say I think the idea of ranking human beings like this is deeply wrong :-)

Of course I'd rank her higher, if she's my fave. Who would she be lower than :-?

And when I see who ranks higher, it makes me dislike or think less favorably of them.
Apart from making me laugh :-)

That's one of the reasons I think the model ratings/rankings is a bad idea.

All I can say Browning is wait till the braces come off! :-)))

I am keeping my fingers crossed! :-)

But you see Doug, there lies the problem.....what makes you think your opinion is more important than anyone else's?

You dislike a model because someone else favors "her" more than your Kristel.
Why does your Kristel deserve to be ranked higher?.....simply because you think so?

Because she has hair down there! That's why

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Gotta say -- notice the thumbs and see why I say that people on this site are
1) stupid;
2) will applaud anything, no matter how stupid, stupid people say against me;
3) not everybody is in this category, but there are enough to qualify this site as one of the stupidest on the net;
4) it figures -- consider what its members think is good :-)
5) it ain't what I think is :-)
6) -- think I said it all, at least for now. You guys are sheep. Make that lambs headed for slaughter :-)))
There's a choice word for y'all I'll refrain from using, since this is a "family" site :-)))

Keep up the thumbs, brave lambs! :-))))

Always talking about sheep and fur...I think we just figured out what your real preference in females is...

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I want a cute furry lamb with a head on her shoulders :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Oh, I missed my chance! :-(

Let me rephrase that.


Thumbs up, brave lambs! :-)))


I know, I know, lambs don't have thumbs! :-)

Still, I think you get my point :-)

Would you believe

Thumbs up, brave sheep :-?

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

There's strength in numbers! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

And btw, how many of you are downgrading Kristel as a cowardly way to get at me?
I suspect at least a few of you dastards :-)

If that is the case, that would be asinine, but I don't believe people will "punish" Kristel simply because they disagree with you Doug.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kristel has actually climbed one spot today from #100 to #99.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

The reason I mention that is 'cause she recently fell -- that is within the last couple of days -- from a 9.02 to a 9.01; also the last time I looked she was in the mid-to-high 80s.

Yes I have enemies who I believe would rate her lower because of me.

No proof, just observations :-)

But another reason I'd like to see that "system" abolished :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

BTW she had been at 9.02 for a looong time :-)

As I said, if that is true.....it's asinine. I'm not saying you're wrong, but it's difficult to believe anyone would do such a thing.

It's impossible to know why any model goes up and down in the ratings. I have no idea how many members MA has, or how many members join in a typical week/month.
There are so many variables. Unless MA has actual data showing who voted for which model, what they rated her, and when they did so....there is no way to know for sure.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Just take a look at how some of them respond to me :-)

I agree with you about the obscure (and suspicious :-) nature of the model ratings/rankings. Rylsky claims to have a "special sauce" formula that results in more accuracy on his site. I say why knock yourself out in the first place?
Chuck 'em and find a better way to present your models.

Leaving this up to the vagaries of "the membership" -- well, we see the results.

That's why I try not to look :-)

Somebody just the other day downed poor Krissy over on Stunning 18 with one crappy vote -- but I'd tell her, honey, that's what you get for bein' there.

It's a nasty game. The ratings at least. They truly belong to the dark ages :-(

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Don't forget her underarms! :-)

No, as I've indicated before I think, it takes more than just that hair to make me fall in love :-)

It's *everything* about Krissy, "the cover girl who didn't shave" :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Hear that, idiots?

No, you're too stupid :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Everybody's opinion is more important than everybody else's! :-)))

Of course she deserves to be ranked higher because I think so! :-))

That's the whole point of the absurdity of these rankings.

I haven't talked to a single person who has told me so-and-so deserves a higher number than Kristel.

I'm just looking at a bunch of dumb, anonymous numbers decided upon who knows how, and giving ridiculous results!

In my oh so humble opinion, of course!

So the stupid rankings rile me, hurt me, and I think I'm not the only one who is at least temporarily offended by them.

Besides other viewers, how do you think the models and their photogs feel about them?

If you're temporarily on top of the heap, I'm sure you like 'em fine :-)

But what happens when you fall? And fall. And fall?

Well, I guess you become philosophical, like me! :-)))

Doug, who are all these people you talked to that have told you "so-and-so" shouldn't be ranked higher than Kristel?
Are they Met Art members who actually have a vote? If so, please give us their names (or ask them to chime in).

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Nobody -- I haven't talked to anyone about that.

I gave her a 10 of course, and except for one other girl that I *spitefully* gave an 8 to, I've never cast another "model" vote.

What I would like to see as I've said before is a parameter that truly indicates who the real faves are:

One vote for one girl per member.

No jimmy-jackin' around, no sort-ofs and maybes. Tell us who is the best, period.

The girls getting the most of these votes would be the true MA faves :-)

Now, not everyone would be able to cast a vote, because they don't have a single fave.

Well, as I've said, so be it. We tally the votes we have, and publish them.

I think it would be very up-close-and-personal, and shine a light on girls wronged by the current ranking system. Which is or will be all of them eventually :-)

This was done small-scale on RA -- it was quite eye-opening :-)

RA members aren't MA members though.....MA has several thousand members (a much larger, more diverse, group).

Also (unlike you and I), I doubt most members could actually pick a true "single/solitary" favorite.
So in your scenario the vast majority of MA members wouldn't have a vote and only those models who have a "fanatical admirer/s" (myself included) would dominate the top rankings.

Isn't your real issue you dislike the ranking system because your favorite isn't where you think she should be?
My question is why do you care where she ranks? She's #1 to you and if she reads any of these comments she surely knows how you feel. Isn't that satisfaction enough?

Yes, Browning, I don't think I could pick only one single favorite out of the hundreds (thousands?) of fine women featured on this site. It is unrealistic to do for that many models and sets. It's hard to just pick a dozen.

I keep my own ratings record for sets (not models), that way I can search among my preferences for what I want. Yes, the MA ratings are not perfect, but there has to be some way for a member to sort out his/her favorites out of thousands of sets. Lets face it, the tags have turned to garbage and near worthless for a search aid.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Thatz because you're not a lover :-)

But that's OK -- to each his or her own :-)

I'm only here because of Kristel and Rylsky -- that's a very unusual reason, I think:
to follow one model only.

I find other things of interest, but that original reason remains.

Guess thaz why it's obvious for me to come up with the one vote/one model idea.

Still, I think it would be a very good exercise for you all to attempt -- it would focus your minds on the most important things.

Quality over quantity :-)

Very likely asking too much here :-))))

Not a lover? I don't come here to find love! I reserve that for real life. Looking at erotic pictures of women is more for lust. Part of my appeal to this site is seeing such a variety of women from different countries, why would I want to focus on just one?

Quality over quantity is counter to a site that posts an average of four sets per day. That is quantity, my friend. It would be more for a site that posts one large update a week. If that is what you want, you may indeed be asking too much here.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

That's what I mean. And I'm not putting you down! I simply meant you're not "in love" with a girl here.
Like I am :-)))

There are a few others here that arouse my interest, but I don't "care" about them like I care about u-know-who :-))

Crazy, yes, but I can't help it! :-))

Even on this site tho if you were of a mind to you could focus on quality rather than quantity. Which I have attempted with KL's sets, and other sets I focus on (a pretty small number, admittedly.)

But you are a lover of MA generally, seems to me -- so...
Love on! :-))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

...or I should say

Lust on! :-)))


MA is what you make it :-)))

Now, if I could just make it the way I wanted.... :-)))





The Dreamer :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Sure, but MA looks at RA as an experimental lab :-))

Thaz what I indicated -- most couldn't pick one. It doesn't matter -- count the votes you do get. It will still be very revealing -- surprisingly so, if RA's are any indication.

I think those voters would be speaking for a lot of others at least in a general way.

Yes, what started me on this was seing where Kristel was ranked. I thought WTF!! and was off to the races :-)

Since then I've come to understand some of the why behind the injustice :-)

The only reason I've fought against it is because those rankings are (were? I don't look anymore :-) prominently featured on this site.

I also thought looking at a typical lineup that MA wasn't helping its appeal, which believe it or not I don't want to see.

If KL knows how I feel and it helps her, that's all I can ask for. I want her to believe in herself, as she did when she got going with Rylsky.

It would seem she then started to lose her way. At least in an artistic sense.

But it's not too late -- she's still a baby :-)))


BTW, we're not asking voters to be fanatical -- just thoughtful perhaps in a way they never have been :-)

"Sure, but MA looks at RA as an experimental lab"
===========
Wherever did you get that information? RA is a spin-off, like many others here. It's a business venture, create another market with an established name and known talent, more subscribers, more profit. It worked for them with Erro and others, why not more.

What are they experimenting for? To see what Rylsky could do on his own? No need to experiment - he is respected and has a good share of the posted material on MA, so it is predictable that RA would succeed.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Look at the stuff he tries that the mothership doesn't because it's too unwieldy and conservative.
My understanding from one who would know is that MA takes note of what RA's doing to see the reaction it gets.
It's kinda like a small co. can be a lot more nimble and quick to change/adapt than a large one...
RA experiments where MA does not :-)




Hey Doug, if you ever write a book, I'll give you a hint before the editors roast you- your book is going to have to be written without ANY smiley faces! OMG how will you manage???

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

No, it's gonna break new ground (new smiles & frowns) in the publishing world! :-)))

Are the pages going to be hairy?

Best post of the day!!!

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

U disappoint me, Browning :-))))

Don't be too disappointed Doug....I actually don't mind pubic hair myself. I'm old enough to know of a time when women didn't shave (only trimmed it in the summer so they could wear swim suits/bikinis without people staring:)).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only difference between us is that I really don't care one way or the other.
I'm not a fan of underarm hair, but that's probably more of a cultural thing since women where I live never let "it" grow (at least in my lifetime or life experience).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've only run into one other person who felt as strongly as you do. This guy was a few years older than me and absolutely despised it when women shaved their pubic hair.
========================
It seems to me that you are much more hostile about the subject than you were in the past.
If you don't mind me asking, what's up with that?

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

My hostility is in response to the hostility I have encountered for suggesting more diversity on this site.
People completely misunderstand what I am pushing for.
They think I'm telling them not to like shaved.
I'm telling them let's see unshaven as well here.

You're like a lot of people on this site, who don't care one way or another.
Not gonna help my cause! :-))

I'm a radical on it -- it's more than skin-deep as far as I'm concerned. The chronic automatic mindless removal of it for the sake of industrial conformity -- not to mention outright stupid non-reasons -- by golly it's enuf to piss me endlessly! :-))

BTW if you haven't noticed I luv comparing KL both ways. She's just about the only beauty here one can do that with.

Shows ya why I'm pushing for change. Which very much threatens some on this site :-)

You complain about "industrial conformity" on the removal of hair, as if all other sites present models without hair...yet it took me just 10 seconds searching to find numerous sites catering to those seeking unshaven women...and certainly you know this -- I'd even bet you are a regular on some of those sites as well.

I'll bet too, that many members here also visit other sites for other personal preferences as well...I know I do.

Are you on those sites complaining about the lack of shaven women?

So, with all of the options on the internet for preference fulfillment, why do you choose to beat up this site and the members?...one can only conclude that you are an antagonist.

Instead of parroting back "why do I beat you up" or "trying to change minds" or "you all are mindless sheep" or "you all are threatened" or anyone of your typical responses, try to tell us why you can't leave it alone regarding hair on THIS site...in reality, the internet is one big site that caters to whatever you desire--and that's why it's annoying that you choose to annoy us on this site...don't be a Don Quixote.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I want MA to be an emporium for "all tastes" -- or at least more than we now see here.

For a brief time years ago I subscribed to one of the sites that has a big unshaven section --

I'm here frankly because of Rylsky's images of Kristel. She is the best-looking model I've ever seen by far. There are a few other models here who don't shave it at least sometimes; there are others who never don't shave that I'm trying to get to not shave, because I like them.
I look at all these girls here -- almost all shaven -- and think what a shame. This site would be fantastic if they'd let us see their bushes.
IOW, let us see them both ways, as Kristel does.

So yep Comments can be annoyin'. Turn 'em off. Hide 'em. You don't have to read 'em. Everybody's allowed to express their opinion aloud, etc :-)))

I know I annoy some. But to me itz worth it :-))))))))

Doug, You're going to get hostility in response to some of the things you say, "If you don't like hair, then you don't like women," and the like. Challenging and labeling people will always provoke them. I don't think it is so much your message (because there are bush lovers in the membership), it is the comments you put out there to support your reasoning that are often confrontational.

Part of the marketing for sites like this is to focus on certain areas of appeal. As such, diversity goes against their business practices. It's like having a radio station that plays rock and county mixed together - it wouldn't do too well for most audiences.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I'm tryin' every trick in my bag to get 'em to diversify! :-))

Look, they do have a little bit of diversity. So they're not completely averse to it :-)

It's the whole industry that is lacking diversity -- sites that show hair are considered niche sites.

Which to me illustrates the absurdity of the situation.

I'm asking MA to lead the way back to sanity.

A better world!

I know it's asking too much!

And its membership is putting up quite a fight! :-))

Itz happy with 99% denuded/airbrushed etc :-)

We're just gonna have to be patient :-))

Weaning takes time :-)))

Doug, I'm not going offer advice (because my opinion is just that, my opinion), but I would like to state what I have observed (and kilroy touched on a valid point).
I'm guessing you've done this for at least a few reasons:
1) Your frustrated because you feel MA is being forced to purchase sets of shaven models.
2) Your aggravated when people (including me) minimize what you see as an important issue.
3) Because of #2, when you get really irritated, you purposely agitate various and/or certain people in an attempt to get under their skin.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Am I anywhere near correct on this?

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

On your first part, yes, if they want to put up 4 new sets a day, in their view they are forced to purchase sets of shaven models. Because these models/sets have to be good-looking enough to meet MA standards.
Now, I think there are "hairy" models on other sites that would be plenty good-looking enough to meet those standards -- which really aren't that high, IMO :-) -- but getting them here is another question.
On your second point, no, you guys minimizing what's important to me doesn't aggravate me -- what I perceive as stupidity, small-mindedness, meanness, does. So on occasion I fire back :-)
In my better moments I'm more forbearing, gentler :-)))

I'm really not trying to get under their skin -- I'm tryin' to get 'em out from under mine :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

There'll be fuzz on the smilies :-)

Second funniest comment of the day!

Spoiled for choices on great cover shots in this set. Ukraine keeps giving us amazing beauties.

Love the strawberry blond hair and sparkling blue eyes. Nice all around set. Some great close in facials, Great intimate closeups and a nice mix of portrait and landscape format. Great body, nice poses and not at all shy. Nice background and a nice blanket to keep the dirt away from the outstanding body. #81 is awesome! And no it would not look better with hair.

Calm down guys, We all know that Doug feeds on controversy and none of you will ever win simply because he "sees" what he wants to see and believes that his arguments are the only valid arguments. He has tunnel vision and has amassed a huge library of "Doug" facts that he believes are truth beyond doubt. It is like arguing politics or religion. There is no right or wrong and there can be no winner. Only opinion and you know what they say about opinions. If we all simply ignored him he would wither on the vine.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Well could you not say the same about everyone else here, including yourself?

I make you guys so emotional that you lose your heads, turning into blind, smug, self-righteous idiots :-)

Not to be too blunt about it.

Apply the criticism of me to yourselves, dudes. It really will be edifying.

BTW, I don't mean everybody here -- just the loudest, the most frantic, the most certain they are right.

The most "serious."

Now, what were we talking about?

Just have a look at what I said to kick this thing off, and consider the reactions that snowballed.

Talk about tunnel-vision. That's what happens when minds shut down.

Take a deep breath and begin to pry yours open again...

Not that some of you have not! :-))

When we see the reactions I'm getting, that tells me one thing: somebody's got a lot to be defensive about.

Namely the narrow tastes under siege on this site.

Wow! Hard to believe I'm talking to "grown-ups" :-)

But I'm not :-)))


And that is *my* opinion :-)

Agree with your last comment. Perfect beautiful bald pussy. So lickable and lovable!

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

How would you know it wouldn't look better with hair :-?

WTF????...who the hell are you to presume what he likes or dislikes?...it's his preference and I'm willing to bet he does give a shit about what you think.

Doesn't give a shit that is

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

You had it right the first time :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Before flying off the handle, read his comment, then my question :-)

His comment--uh, and no it would not look better with hair.

Your response--how do you know it wouldn't look better with hair?

He stated his preference, you questioned his preference...what am I missing here?

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

No, what I meant was, how would you know if you hadn't seen it with hair?
After all, sometimes he likes hair :-)

You're seeing red guy, and it's blinding you :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Or IOW, WTF is right! :-)))

I was responding to his response to my original comment.

Not a bad idea to think before you act, if there's time. And why wouldn't there be time, here :-?

You need to get yourself under control, my friend :-)

You need to stop telling people what to think

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

You need to take some of your own advice :-)

Where have I told you or anyone else what to think?

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Practically all you've been doing here is telling me what to think, or not think. Right?

I'm all for taking good advice, but... :-)

I have never told you what to think...I have however said, in not so many words, that I don't appreciate your constant haranguing of the rest of us on the virtues of hair--think what you want, all you want...but I do believe a person does their "thinking" in their brain, and not out loud (as for example, on this blog).

As I asked before--you have no idea of what I prefer in women on this site, because I do my "thinking" outside of the posts here... I'm pretty sure we know what you "think" of hair...

...if "thinking" out loud is a requirement on this site, then let's try some variety of topics...oops!, sorry! I am telling you what to think...:-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Talk about haranguing! Jeezuz... You're outdoing me :-)

As I've said to other people, if you've heard my message, then it isn't for you. So skip on by it.

Otherwise you're gonna be exhausted by your emotional reaction to it.

I'm gonna keep saying what I want to say to specific people. In Comments.

And if you actually had read my comments going all the way back to 8/13, you'd see I talk about a number of things.

You're getting riled by the hair issue, but that I think is because you're very happy with the pics on this site generally. I am not -- and not just because of the lack of bushes :-)

You're right to be riled in this sense: you "know" I'm "threatening" or at least challenging the status quo here.
I've been doin' that since day one.
I'm a critic!

So skip on by. My understanding is that I have as much right to be a critic here as you have to be a praiser, a defender of the fort :-)

If you wanna reply to me, fine, -- I'm just letting you know a little more of how I see it :-)

FYI--you are no threat, just annoying. Like the pebble in the shoe...

...just emptied my shoe, feel much better now :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Thank heavens! :-)

Please Don't Feed The Troll

Yes, advice I will heed going forward

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Brave advice indeed! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Too late pal -- they can't resist! :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

87, 89, 90, et al -- would look a whole lot better with fur, sweetie :-)
Try it -- you might like it :-)
The way nature intends it :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Not all that unlike your head looks better with hair...

It's not there just to be removed, as if it were dental plaque :-)))

Nature intended her legs to have hair as well...but you don't want that, do you...

This constant argument back and forth isn't going to change anyone's mind...it just ends up being a waste of everyone's time--I'd rather extole the fact that she has a fantastic pussy, regardless of the absence or presence of hair...

Nature gives us Appendix and that have to be removed, She gives us tonsils that have to be removed later. The hair on our heads has to be cut as do fingernails and toenails so I don't see where removing unwanted hair is any sort of encroachment on her divine plan. She put that hair there back before there were clothes to protect those delicate parts. It did at the time have a very good purpose for it's existence but it was not intended to make women more desirable. It was intended to protect. It has no useful purpose in the modern world unless you are a nudist. There are literally billions of women running around with natural bush so removing it makes women unique and if we feel that that is desirable why should you hair lovers think we are wrong. Beauty IS in the eyes of the beholder and our tastes are ours alone. Nuff said!

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

And you know those useless tonsils for example that were always being removed we now know are part of the immune system?

A lot of natural stuff we get rid of ignorantly (if profitably :-) is actually our friend, if only we weren't too dumb to realize it.

See very many ecological examples :-)

Shaving off all your pubic hair all the time is not the equiv of getting a haircut, shaving your face or clipping your fingernails. But it is a stupid argument we hear often on this abysmal site :-)

And tell the many guys out there attracted by women's sexual hair that it is not there for attraction's sake.
Tell that to women who know better :-)
I'm not saying it's the only reason, but it is surely one :-)

Speaking of natural protection, listen to this:

http://www.npr.org/2014/04/14/302899093/modern-medicine-may-not-be-doing-your-microbiome-any-favors


BTW again you as many others do self-servingly twist my message. I'm not saying you are wrong in your tastes and preferences -- I'm saying it is wrong to serve only those tastes and preferences here. As if others don't count. Others which happen to be shared by the vast majority of the world.
Despite Gillette imperialism :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Thinking about this a little further, I'd like to hear hip's opinion on head hair, eyebrows, beards, all the hair we find on our bodies. Is it all a now-useless vestige of the prehistoric past? Should we yank it all out -- develop an alopecic gene so we don't grow any of the nasty stuff at all :-?

Hey, maybe that's the future. I can't wait! :-))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Commence yanking! :))

You've heard of pulling your hair out, right?

Well, this is taking it to another level! :-)))




The Nut :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Sure, I'd like to see her leg hair, though I don't think it would improve her looks like a bush would :-)

How do you know these ideas won't change anyone's mind?

I mean after all, ideas changed Erica's and a lot of other minds about shaving...

Extol away -- but don't forget that hair is part of her 'fantastic" pussy :-)

Sigh... I gotta stop talking to bricks, cause they just don't get it...

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I presume you mean talking to yourself! :-)
Inform yourself, dude, before hittin' that button!

Slow down! I mean that as "friendly" advice.

Look before you leap! :-))))

And calm down first, if possible :-)

You won't make so many mistakes :-)

Again, your definition of pussy...my definition of a great pussy doesn't have to include hair one way or the other

In other words, pussy is still pussy, whether there's hair present or not.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Agreed. But ask yourself why it has hair.

To me, if people would really think about that, more would agree to let it be.

Sorry, no...I don't need you to tell me what to ask myself...

My preference is not going to change...

BTW---can anyone here tell me what my preference for pussy is?...no, they can't... And likely no one cares either ...that's the point

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Just a suggestion. I thought you might find it interesting :-)
Possibly mind-blowing, even :-)

As I've said to you before, I'm not trying to change people's preferences or tastes, because I don't imagine I can.

But I am trying to see if maybe they cannot be expanded, made broader, almost as if I were reminding them of something they had forgotten.

Examine that last statement --

It's illogical and contradictory, Captain.

By logical definition, your "prime directive" demands that others change their opinions.

Your use of symantics suggests a brilliant future in politics, but it only fools those with problems in reading comprehension and analytic thought.

G'day, mate --

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

OK, that occurred to me.
But I think there's a difference between "expanding" and broadening people's tastes and trying to make them not like what they like.

They can like what they like. I want them to like more!

So in that way I am trying to change hearts and minds here.

I plead guilty! :-)))

+ 1 thumb up for being candid!

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

You get a thumb for that yourself :-))

Thatz it -- broadening minds -- that's what I'm up to here :-)

A thankless task! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

BTW, you wonder why some politicians and other usual suspects are wildly successful in this world?
You nailed it! :-))))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

And btw keep those anti-Doug thumbs coming. Your chumps need all the help they can git! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

IOW, ecstatic applause for stupidity.
Consider the source :-))))


Access The Full Set Of 125 Images By Joining MetArt Today!
CLICK for FREE ACCESS