T O P
Forgive Rylsky, maybe that TOP is not clear.
I wanted to say: "Non plus ultra."
these idiots that start wars never seem to realise beautiful women are going to get killed. what are they thinking?
I don't usually get involved in these bush no bush debates, but I can't help comment on the one where the guy is asking Rylsky to ask the model to grow a bush. How would that play out? :-) would the model be offended? would the models boyfriend (or girlfriend) be offended? how would Mrs.. Rysky feel about it? perhaps Mr. Rylsky will pass or seek advice. :-) by the way, in Irina J s bio it says that she seeks recognition as a model, I know I'm not what she had in mind, but I rate her as a heartbreaker and a 10. :-)
Mrs. Rysky? Models might be offended? I'm sorry Beethoven, but I don't get what you are trying to say.
I also don't know if the post you sent an hour later referring to starting wars is a follow up to this thread, but if it is - again - huh? Liking bush is starting a war?
I forgot, a few days ago, it was Paloma's birthday... Happy Birthday sweet Paloma:-)
I normally don't even look at duos on Metart but these two are models that I like so I took the chance.
This set indeed has magic. These two are both beautiful experienced models and this set works because they were not trying to fake emotions that can't exist under Metart standards. It was simply two wonderful young women having fun and posing together, not competing for the camera's attention. I liked the street scenes and the indoor work with that simple white background was a masterstroke. It focused everything on the girls and used the differences between them as the point of interest. Blond versus brunette pale skin versus Irina's darker complexion. A delightful mix and wonderful team work from the girls.
I think this is the best duo I have seen in a long time.
They're just looking for trouble in Russia with the new laws there.
Don't worry -- Rylsky'll protect 'em! -)
Rylsky - I so wish you would encourage more models to photograph with a nice triangular bush. It seems that much of your work (and this site) is focused on shaved women. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I thought you might welcome the feedback
Sure I like feedback. Thank you.
But what is your idea about "much of your work is focused on shaved women"? If you think this way - it is your choice. But please see my sets and if you will find I am FOCUSED... you really will surprise me.
First off, thank you for responding. I am a fan of your work and it is nice to know that you take time to write to your fans.
With that said - I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you said in your response. The only thing that I was trying to convey is that I personally prefer women with hair than shaved and I would love it if you would find more models or encourage the beautiful ones you know to consider displaying a more full spectrum of the female form.
OK, I'll try to say it in other words.
I am focused on beauty and personality. I am not focused on pubic hair or shaved bikini area. I hope members here are not focused on vagina/ass anatomy as well, because if they want it - no reasons to be member of MetArt. We see enough sites with vaginas and absence of any personality.
So my 1st keyword is "sensuality of a person", 2nd word is "variety" which include everything: from locations to (yes!) pubic hair.
I hope it makes sense this time.
I'll step in for Mr Rylsky: he does encourage them to let their hair grow. But that's all he can do. What you see is what the model herself is willing to show.
As you can see, very few of even his models are willing to show us anything but their shaven pubic hair.
A full bush? Very very rare.
Same with underarms. Etc.
Tell him you want him to shoot Eddison. It seems he might have that option.
It's too bad we find ourselves in this era of rigid conformity. Is there light at the end of the tunnel?
Glimmers here and there...
Evita Lima let a bit of hers grow...
Watching two beautiful girls like Irina and Paloma, naked, in your mind are only the bushes?
This is not very healthy.
To tell you the truth, gaetano, I didn't even look at this set :-)
But I will say I don't think shaving your bush off all the time is very healthy :-))
Tell him you want him to shoot Eddison.
it was my question exclusively for you. you've made your choice and Eddison is out of our plans on RA.
BTW, "this era of rigid conformity" contains 100 times more unshaven models if you will compare it to 30-100 years ago when "unshaven empire" was "rise". The problem (?) is percentage of unshaven vs. shaved. For your information, I have 10 unshaven models in my mailbox who wanted to work with us. I think nobody of them would impress you or our members much, but it looks promising for you.
We must look not only MatArt and his group but also other quality sites (quality). 99% of the models are shaved, clean.
The vast majority of the subscribers of these sites want the models shaved.
Lovers of the hairs are very few. luckily
It 'obvious that the underwriters who love the hair should be able to see the things that they love!
It 's just a matter of proportions.
10 groups of 100 OK - 20 groups of 100 ok.
But no more.
Well, I wouldn't join RA just for her, probably, but she would have been a very interesting addition... :-)
That is interesting about the unshaven girls.
But as you know it's not enough just to be unshaven.
You gotta be appealing otherwise.
That is what was so great about u-know-who.
If you're that beautiful and unshaven as well, WOW! :-)))
I really wish some of your current best-babes would try it. They would wow people. But they're too conservative, too successful to take a chance... :-)
To "normal" to really care about it is more like it:-)
Don't think it's really that normal to always shave off your pubic hair :-)
Undoubtedly, one of the best duo galleries for MET ART in quite some while. The presentations of the varying sexual positions is incredible, with a "menage a trois" flavor given to the viewer,(e.g. spoon, missionary, etc. etc.), - definitely makes one feel they're part of Athreesome. Highest rating, (10), for the Maestro on this one; wish I was there during the shooting. As always, selecting two of the all-time best, Paloma and Irina, was well-planned for this one.
Cute-o-meter just pegged at the top end and exploded!
Double Dream job for Rylsky, very nice!!! Paloma and Irina, two Stunning Beauties and both so sweeeeet to die for completely... What for Dolls!!! Sweet chocolate Kisses Муси-пуси Сладкие:-):-):-)
I am not a big fan of girl girl sets, but I think this set is very nice indeed. Both models are gorgeous and are among my favorites. I liked the first 20 photos, showing these beautiful ladies out on the street. Paloma's hair style with all those curls is lovely. The Matryoshka doll was a really unique prop.
I see that Paloma and Irina have posed together at least twice before. They do seem to know each other and may actually be friends. They work very well together. Two beautiful goddesses that magnify each other's beauty. Excellent.
What a sweet and adorable pair of cuties!
As a better example: Look at "Tenderness", Eva F & Silvia B.
You mean as an example that you personally prefer.
Thanx for the unnecessary clarification :-)))
You are very welcome Doug. I wish to thank you too for your remarkable dedication to educating everyone here as to what your opinion on pubic hair is (remind us again - we have forgotten since the last hundred times you posted it!)
Hey, reeducation takes long and persistent effort! :-)))
It's also known as "thankless" :-))
And btw Rylsky it seems we're the only ones who understand :-)))
It's Rylsky magic: Christmas in May!
Always the same. The girls seem to be in love with the photographer - not wich each other! They have only eyes for the camera.
Perhaps they are trying to convey the impression that they have eyes for the viewer...
More sets of model Irina J and galleries by Rylsky on the Met Art Network: