English

This gallery contains 130 images @ 25 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Comments

The shirt she is wearing on the first ten photo's is totally awesome! :D

If you're going to Photoshop out the massive tattoo on her foot in one picture, you probably should in all of them just for consistency.

Or, you know, just leave the photos untouched.

The oversized, open necked top with a pale pink shear fabric offers many possibilities. Most of which are too subtle for this light. Our photographer and model make some good use of the shirt with posing. But the contrast between the pink and the blue grey eyes is merely suggested -a frustration to see. I nearly missed the see through effect.

We see the hint of potential for posing, bringing out the color of the eyes, and seeing skin through the fabric in image 47.

Is that a tampon string I see tucked inside her in image 54? Look at it on high res you'll see it.

Hmmm, Interesting that you are looking so close. Looking at closeups like this in hi res is just a bit over the top for me. I love closeups but that's a bit too close. ;)

At any rate I am sure economics comes into play here. These girls need to be booked in advance for shoots and since a girl has her period about every 4 weeks the odds are 1 in 4 that your timing will be bad. Since travel, accommodations and staff must be scheduled it stands to reason that a shoot can't be called if the model starts or has not yet finished.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

The devil is in the details, hipshot :-)

Hey, at least she was wearing a tampon! :-)

I sure don't mind a little reality showing up in MetArt photos :-)

Maybe Mr Iskan ought to shoot with a lower-rez cam :-?

Looking close is an option we have here...

I think it is interesting that image 55 shows that Katie is menstruating in this set. Not the first time, but always interesting.

"Wouldn't it be loverly"... I love Katie! This is nice...

My sole complaint is the file size!

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

It's ironic, isn't it, that the guy would use that much apparent resolution only to paint over details with Photoshop :-)
As usual, I am mystified :-)
As I've noted before, the overall best technical image quality I see on this site is shot with "full-frame" cameras and "prime" lenses. At a relatively modest pixel-count.
These are expensive cameras employed by pros. Who know what they are doing, and care about quality.
I would like to see more of the MetArt membership be able to tell the difference. Quality would then have to go up. As long as mediocrity is happily consumed and more of it demanded, that's mostly what we're gonna get here.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Mr Airbrush is at it again.
If you're gonna paint over a stubbly mons, at least do a halfway decent job of it, Mr Iskan.
Compare 35 and 38 at 100% in an imaging program (I'm using Apple's Preview) if you want to see clearly what I'm talkin' about.
MetArt, how do you in good conscience serve this stuff up?

I don't see the problem. We're not here for the actual model's look, we're here for the 'created' one. Makeup, setting, costumes, hairdos, everything is used to enhance the model's beauty. Or do you think it's just some airbrushing that's doing that?

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

No, some of us are here for the "actual model's look." In my case, my fave models' "actual" look. That's why they're my faves :-)

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

...and "airbrushing" does not enhance a model's beauty. It takes away from it.
If some blemish has to be airbrushed, guess she's not really that beautiful, right? But then airbrushing her just makes her fake.
But I'm talkin' here about wholesale painting over of shaven skin. Since when does a mons veneris need that kind of "enhancement?"
As I've said, I suspect more than a little misogyny at work...

You're looking too close... They've been doing this for several years now and it's not likely to change. They (Met) 'serve it up' because we keep buying it... Back up a bit and enjoy. All the bitchin' in the world isn't gonna change this practice.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Disagree.
This guy Iskan is one of their last hold-outs, as far as I can tell (which isn't very far, admittedly.) Plus, this set looks like it was done some time back -- we'll have to see if he continues the practice with new sets. If he does, and I'm around, I'll call him and MetArt on it. I'm here for photos, not paintings.
Who knows? More people may begin to notice it and care. Even Mr Iskan might think twice about it :-)

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Oh, and I do look closely, often with gratification, at pictures of young women :-)

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

One more thing -- we ought to hold them to their "fine photography" claim, and to that other hilarious assertion that "[they do] not alter [their] photos with airbrushing techniques and other photo altering practices." :-)

Caveat emptor! :-)

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Should add that all of my comments about this issue are based on looking at the highest resolution image MetArt provides. You probably won't see any "airbrushing" etc at lower rez running slideshows on the internet, quantity over quality. But that's not the only way to view these images.
MetArt's best photos withstand close scrutiny and have life-like detail. That's what I'm paying for. We all want different things, I guess, but I beg to differ with those who say I'm not supposed to look at them this way. You gotta be kidding. Why publish them in full resolution then? So that no one can see what's going on?
It's a risky biz, tho :-)

Don't get me started on the evils of airbrushing! I am passionately against it! It is not necessary.

These fine ladies are humans, the human body is not perfect, nor should we expect pictures of humans to be to be voided of all natural (or unnatural)skin blemishes, imperfections or tattoos.

  • Doug
  • 6 months ago:

Hopefully now that it is un-meekly being pointed out we'll see less of it. But eternal vigilance is the price of freedom (from airbrushing :-)
Some people obviously ain't gonna care, but why should their opinion rule?

Katie Katie pretty lady, How nice to see you again. Sweet and lovely both body and personality.

Katie's here for the second time this month. We must be living right. She is, as always, absolutely scrumptious from head to toe.




Access The Full Set Of 130 Images By Joining MetArt Today!
CLICK for FREE ACCESS