This gallery contains 123 images @ 12 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


I find this a surprisingly touching and intimate set, with a number of excellent shots I had overlooked. Yes, Krissy is the sad-eyed waif, the young beauty who wound up all shaven in this room it seems to invite love she lacks, to make money she needs. But her pathos seems so real. Innocently honest. Yet, compared to the earlier, superficially similar Electio, warmly seductive. She needs you, or somebody, and Atendo is her appeal for love. Though Kristel can be bright and sassy and knowingly seductive, here you wanna go "Awww! Poor baby!" and comfort her.
Not every shot elicits this sympathy, though. After all, this is the confident siren who is not afraid of showing her body hair. Set image 62 alongside 51 for some of the contrast Atendo offers. Kudos to Alex Sironi for his sensitive attention to the physical details and moody expressions of his subject. The color here is excellent, and complements the warmth of Kristel's hair and skin. Though the peek-a-boo Photoshopping of her moles and scratches points to a long-standing MetArt problem -- how much reality to show, how much to hide. Particularly with the moles, when they're there in one pic and gone the next, this does not inspire confidence in the photography or artistic integrity of this site.
But what really matters are Kristel's eyes, and the way she presents herself. She has a movie-actress's fluid range, a heart-on-sleeve transparency, and here they are haunting. Who is this babe? I'm always asking, and in Atendo I think I know. Because of Kristel's frankness, these pics are a revelation, even if she resolutely hides her big white teeth. Maybe someday we'll all get to see them, whether or not they've been "fixed" by braces. In the meantime, what her mouth won't show her eyes do, and her long, lithe body. She's like a reed in the breeze, helplessly expressing every change that comes her way.
She's an extraordinary model. And the surprise for me is how well Atendo shows that ☯

Will never get tired of looking at this girl, Hairy or shaved.

That's what I've found.

Why is that so? It's not simply because she's beautiful. I think it's the "realness" in her eyes -- they are big, blue and easy to read. And that is because they are frank and guileless. You understand her as a human being, not simply a naked model.


The model is so beautiful - the setting is not. please get her out of that sticky room

To each his own as the saying goes. Some food for thought though. Whether hair or stubble or smooth and"silky" is a turn on are all just opinions not objective scientific fact. First off consider if whether or not what you think is sexy, is it because you innermost sexual you really drives you to desire it? Are you wired that way? Or is it because you've been conditioned by peers and society around you to act and think that way. For me there's no peer pressure about my armpit fetish. I always kept it to myself up to now and the only reason I'm opening up here is in the hopes that the site responds with how the models are presented which of course is my right as a customer.
Secondly, whatever you think is sexy is all just a play on the mind by nature to get you to produce a child. That's what it all comes down to biologically.

I'm not really sure why, but in #35, Kristel just draws me right into the photo. Great photo set; love it, love the close shave and love Kristel.

I don't enjoy being judgmental but....

Girl, you're on Met-Art so bring your "A" game and polish your NAILS!

Actually, her nails are polished to a shine and they're well kept. Some of my favorite models, like Davina, have nails that are frequently ragged in closeup. No such problem here. They don't have to be painted to be beautiful.

I stand corrected.

Kristel tops my list, but this set falls a bit short of displaying her beauty in full measure. And I believe that body hair is as obsolete as some of the ideas we cling to about beauty...

"Obsolete"? Try telling that to "God" :-))

It may be obsolete to you, but not to a whole lotta the rest of nature ☯

In any event, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as I'm sure u would agree -- whether or not clung to ☺

A woman's body is a work of art but even fine art can be improved by removing distractions. Body hair is a distraction and, for me, creates an impression of lack of hygiene, not to mention blocking my view of her most fascinating part. Even in Greek and Roman art body hair was never shown. And this applies to stubble too.

Sorry to cut u off, Rock...

If a woman's body is a work of art, who is the artist?

And why would that artist put hair on that work of art?

Just as a distraction? To detract from the work?

See my answer to Rock above.

If it were up to you, it wouldn't be there. Unfortunately or not, it isn't up to you.

Fine if you don't like it. Just don't imagine that you are God :-))

Well thanks...it's not often that someone agrees with me, and 'sharpens my point'... But I noticed we agree on a lot of things.

'faid he blunted yer point :-))

Hey, look, if you wanna be a makeup artist and play god with young women's bodies, "improve" them with razors and paint et al, that's fine -- just don't imagine everyone will agree with your improvements ☺
Some of us think you can't beat nature's "art", nature's beauty.

well, I like it when a woman has no hair below her neck. Not a single one. Just smooth and soft. Like silk.

This girl? Cute. Not more not less. Cute.

Well, she has lots of hair below her neck, shaved or not, and you still find her cute. I guess that's progress! :-))

Kristel is gorgeous and delicious, and this is a great photo set!!! Photo quality is superb!!!

I didn't used to think so about this set (though I always thought Kristel supreme), but now I agree with you about the pics generally, and the story they suggest.
Sometimes it takes awhile to come around... :-)

My personal preference is that a woman have a few days growth. At least though shes not completely smooth to where she's a manaquien. Stubble to me as I've written before is also sexy. I also think girls with light armpit hair are a turn on. Girls that are too hairy start to make me think of a guy's armpits.

This I have trouble understanding but everyone to their own thing. A week or two's growth OK but that period between clean shave and new growth is very unpleasant both visually and for close contact sports.

Kristel is another model who looks much better with natural underarm and pubic hair. I am dismayed at all the hair removal going on. Great beauties should be natural and she is a great beauty. Otherwise the set is very nice.

I wouldn't say she looks "much better" with her underarm and pubic hair unshaven. That is, except perhaps from certain angles. The blessing is that we get to know what she shaves, and thus to me it makes "shaven" Kristel fascinating as well.*
That said, I'll take her unshaven any day. You can't beat the best of her Rylsky sets ☯

*Would I have flipped for Kristel if I had never seen her "unshaven"? Good question!
No doubt I would still have been impressed. But what got me was that she was "the cover girl who didn't shave" ☺

I agree wholeheartedly! I also think she looked better before she started tanning herself so much. Still, a very pretty lady!

Yep, she's pretty cooked in this set, and the (Sironi) one that follows it, Devoto.
Maybe all that Vit D makes her happier? :-)))
Or don't you get that from a tanning bed :-?

Anyway, I'd like to remind the honey not to overdo it -- all those rays damage and age your skin.

such a cutie

The epitome of one ☺

Access The Full Set Of 123 Images By Joining MetArt Today!