She is clearly high among the Top 10 models in the whole business and one of the three reasons I join a site. But Met-Art sometimes, not just in her case, has the strangest ideas of Make-up and clothing. She is so beautiful and perfect and you make another person of her. Sometimes she looks like a doll and not in the least like herself. Why is that? Who forced her to wear stuff like in Nekaji or, worst, Rosachaet? Mejorar is such a beautiful set, but who brought this lipstick into the game? All in all it got better. The last ten sets are much better than the first five to seven, where you almost made her unrecognizable. The hair in her early sets is gruesome. But please, let her keep her natural beauty and stop changing her appearance. If you don't like your models or if you dream of women you cannot find in reality, start painting pictures. My favourites: Doenda, Fulmini, Sunsubiro, Rotas, Calor, Yearning, Brine and Privatus.
Lily has done more than 30 sets at MA, but not a single one with a completely naked beaver. At least, not at MA. She has done a few of those elsewhere, but never at any sites that can compete with MA, in terms of quality and professionalism. For a bit of variety, would MA please do a couple of those, in the absolute top-of-the-line Met style?
How 'bout one with a completely natural beaver* too? :-)
Fat chance on this site!
If ya did I might even look! :-)))
No further comment on MA's "quality and professionalism"! :-))))
Except to say it could use some real diversity.... :-)
*why do you think they call it "beaver" :-?
Dear MetArt, when will we see Lily shaved?
Totally agree. And please see my comment, below.
Please see my comment above :-)
Yummy Pussy, Killer Body, Gorgeous
This girl is the best model on this site. I wish she would do more videos.
Lily is by far the best model I have seen any where! I just fell in love. I would really like to see her interviewed as her self but for sure more movies so we can see her full beauty come through.
Wow that ass! :-)
Lily is another word for heaven! I will say that I wish she worked more with Arkisi, or Sironi or Rylsky. I have never liked Leonardo's work. He does great scenery work but that ain't what I come here for.
One of the most french kissable buttholes of all time!
"Nothing feels better to a man than a woman's good humor." - E. Hemingway
There are many, many beautiful things on Met-Art...
but none is more beautiful than Lily's smile.
We're so very lucky to share that.
Thank you, Lily.
Nice comments, You hit it on the nail head! There are many heavenly bodies on Metart and faces too but to find someone with more screen presence is damn hard!
A by-line to the Moderators. I might as well re-new my sub to Playboy!! Those girls show just as much, are American, Blondes, Brunettes and Redheads, just like you have!! They come from 52 states, and your models don't come from 52 Countries.
My preference has always been for Met-Art and the European models because they have a far broader sexual awareness than their 'Western' counter-parts.
That said, I am seriously PISSED-OFF, when a model comes on-line, she cums On Line because she's excited, loves what she's doing and who she's dining it with, the file is blotted and closed. Anything further from that model is moribund. Dead. Lifeless, no expression or emotion. And THAT is what pisses me off about Met-Art.
During 2010, there didn't seem to be a problem with a model posing with a wet pussy. Jesus, I've even got one with a Tampon string tucked away!!!!
THAT said, the only thing that keeps me here are the NEW girls who have not been told yet to COOL IT!!!!
Rylsky might have opened his own site, but you've lost Tony Murano - the Prince of Pussy. EVERY model who worked with Tony (bar 1), had a rapport with him that was/is undeniable. Her emotions flowed. Her excitement was obvious and she loved what she was doing and where she was.
WHERE THE HELL IS TONY MURANO????
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed the down-turn in substance, not the quality of models, but the appearance of the sets? I have just down-loaded LEONARDO's last set dated 15/05/2013, and looking at the sets he has shot of LILLY C, he hasn't shot a 'close-up pussy' since 25/11/2011.
Has it anything to do with the draconian laws instituted by these puritanical mods of this site in the last 12 or so months?
I've noticed that Leonardo isn't the only on. Some of the biggest names have quit the same style. Who has seen anything of Tony Murano for 2012/13?
He is just one we have seemed to have lost. Rylsky has opened his own site, so he's obviously keeping his best for that, but who can afford $1000.00pa to look at what is Human Nature. Not this Little Black Duck, and that's for sure.
Met-Art has lost it's name Met (Metropolitan) and Art. It claims to be Soft-core porn, well that is B/S. It's become Soft-core Nothing.
It's all subjective and in the eye of the beholder.
I personally like Leonardo's work, and don't like the way Murano photographs women. Rylsky's work...I can take it or leave it. As far as what his models "reveal" on his site, it's not much different than Met, but as far as his volume of content, it's a tiny fraction of what Met has. He has more studio shots (which I happen to like) because the focus is completely on the model and not on some giant "movie set back drop" or "postcard travel location" you see on Met and other sites. I'm here to look at beautiful women...not sand, or flowers, or trees, or furniture, or little bunny rabbits.
I do hear what you're saying though about the wave of "puritanicalism" that seems to be running rampant throughout many of the nude-art websites. I'm not sure who is responsible for that but it's actually been happening for about the last decade. The was a time when any shot, from any angle, near, or far was not considered "taboo." I think Met-Art is trying (or tried) to break out of it with "Sex-Art"...but that's a whole different discussion. I don't think studio models do well in a hardcore porn situation, and vice versa. Then again, I'm only one of thousands who only paid $15 to be here...so how much does my opinion really count?
It's funny how people have so much different opinions and tastes. :)
I'm totally the opposite of you: I prefer much more outdoor sets rather than studio sets. My preference is, from bigger to least: outdoors > indoors with a background (like in a bedroom, living room, etc.) > studio with a plain background.
I find studio sets so boring, savorless and without creativity (I do like some though; it also depends on the model, the poses, the beauty of the set, the effort putted into it, and other factors). I do not want to see only the model, like you, I want to see the model in a place where I can put my imagination to work. It's hard to fantasize in a fake environment (regarding studio sets); it's much more easy to fantasize you and the model when it's in a real place. Also I like to see beautiful places and landscapes.
The ideal photo session for me is like the "Albus" set with Nikia A I mentioned before: the model starts with clothes on in a public place, than makes some shots half naked outdoors and than go indoors and finish the set. Perfect! It could also have finished outdoors, no problem; but the three different places created a kind of story, with start, middle, and ending. The perfect set for me has to tell a story, like that one; it has to have a start, a middle, and an ending. Studio sets for me has only the middle (if the model starts already naked; like in many of Rylsky's sets); it's better, though, if she starts with clothes on and finish it totally naked, like in Antonio Clemens' studio sets. Than it's "start and middle" at least, not only "middle". :P
If you only paid $15 to be here then we in Australia are subsidising your subscription and I'm pretty well pissed off about that I can tell you! I've been thinking about cancelling when my subscription is due for renewal anyway, haven't been getting email notifications that my favourites are on for several months and didn't even get a response when I emailed Sex-Art to let them know my account had possibly been hacked and someone named "Ardent Fan" had been posting on my account. Not happy to say the least. Then Lilly comes along and makes it all worthwhile....
"...and looking at the sets he has shot of LILLY C, he hasn't shot a 'close-up pussy' since 25/11/2011."
You are sorely mistaken at that, my fellow. There are pussy close-up photos in her recent photo sets "Sentido" by Luca Helios and "Soporte" by Leonardo. And there are in others after 11/25/11 too.
If you see the submissions page for photographers here on Met, one of their guidelines is: "DO NOT forget to get close ups of her face and body parts."
It's one of their requirements, so you will always see close-ups of face and body parts here! Besides, the photos are in high resolution, you can always zoom in close to body parts in any photo. That's the thing I love in high-res erotic photos: he possibility to zoom in to face, body parts, or any other detail in the photo, without losing quality. :)
"Rylsky has opened his own site, so he's obviously keeping his best for that"
I have to disagree with you in that too. I've seen some Rylsky Art sets and I think exactly the opposite of you: his best sets are on Met! Most of the sets on his site are studio sets, with no scenery, no beautiful landscapes... just a plain uncomely background; the models start already naked, no clothes or props on... very simple and savorless sets. Now on MetArt, it's another story: his sets here are very beautiful and creative! It looks like they are from another photographer other than Rylsky Art's Rylsky. :P I've recently seen his "Albus" set, with Nikia A; one of the most creative sets I've seen in MetArt yet! Half outdoors, half in indoors; the model starts with clothes on in a public place and than go for a stroll before going indoors... Very creative and beautiful set!
It seems he keeps his best works for MetArt still. :)
Maybe because they have the network of many sites now, they're sorting the material into various levels of "substance". A ploy to get more subscriptions?
Go to your favorite model's page and click on "network" in the top left hand corner. For this model, she appears on 3 sites instead of just one. If you want to keep track of her, that's three subscriptions instead of one.
Uh no ... you got that one wrong. Clicking on the "MetArt Network" hypertext link at the top of any model's page shows the MetArt Network sites YOU'VE subscribed to (the viewer) NOT the number of other MetArt sites the model appears on.
Lili's definitely a master definition of perfection. She has very special, magical sight and her whole body isn't only gorgeous. Her poses in front of camera are so mystical, that they can bring man into a dreaming reality in just few seconds. But Lili is an angel, so these dreams simply can't be ditry, dealing with sex. They're about beautiful teasing and consequently about petting. I allways enjoy her new set, when they comes out. Thank You for posing in all sets, Lili. Thank You for excellent work, MetArt.
So Young & such a Stunning Beauty, with a Killer body... 10++ she is total package!
One of the best bodies on Met-Art, period!
Agreed. Lily has the overall finest body on Met. She also has the overall most athletic body on Met. Those two things are not a coincidence. Feminine muscle -- YUM!
She also has the best legs on Met. Other models come close, but where they all come in second to Lily is the knees. To have great legs, you have to have great knees, and Lily's got them in spades.
Lily brings me a lot of joy. She is a perfect and beautiful young girl whose features are the typical example of a unique and natural beauty.
I love her entire galleries and it would be great if I was able to watch a new photo set at least one per month :)
More sets of model Lily C and galleries by Leonardo on the Met Art Network: