This gallery contains 133 images @ 39 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


I expect photos of a lovely girl and get a photo essay on macular degeneration. What gives?

Oh the Eastern European female buttocks! Lily is prime meat in this area! After three years living around and travelling there, I have to say this girl is really like many of them! She may not even go to gym, she may do a lot of walking as most people do there! The western ladies drive everywhere and have gotten flat or fat assed! Just sayin'!

This isn't the best photo shoot of Lily, but she is still without a doubt one of the sweetest models on Met Art. I just love the way she squats and looks back over her shoulder at the camera...it's enough to make a grown man cry.

I agree this isn't her best set (not her fault) but some of the poses here really show off those sexy muscular legs of hers.

You have it in one about the photography. Lily is a very good model and Leonardo has loused it up AGAIN. As you say very few close ups - and when she offers a very intimate pose he focuses on her face, twice. Why the effect of looking through a telescope I don't know, maybe it's artistic. A number of photographers have forgotten that MetArt members in effect pay their wages. I don't think Rylsky would have done this, he's got more sense!

well said!

Lily did not blame.
This set has not Met the Art.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

A new standard for repetitiousness?
Man, does that doorway get old while she runs through her routine.
Another vet in dire need of re-grooving.
Of being seen fresh.
29: nice shot. Great use of shadows.
41: typical bit of a focus problem. Why not use a smaller aperture?
86: thanks for a different look. You actually look real...
Too many poses, not enough reality in this set.
BTW, you ought to let your bush be at least as substantial as your eyebrows. It would go with you...

For sure, This set is extremely repetitious. That vignetting effect is very undesirable. A few shot ok but an entire set unacceptable. Almost all of Leonardo's work is this way he does almost no close in work. It's like he sets the camera on a tripod and shoots with a remote!

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

It makes you appreciate you-know-who all the more...


No red banner today but Lily is still a top ten model. Good day when you have two top ten models on the same day. Lily has been shot by three different artist. Who do you all think did the best with her?

(As a side issue Jeff jumped to #1 over night! One set? Interesting...)

Lily has always been top ten for me. She is never very far out of that prestigious position and has been #1 on several occasions.

As for photographers I think Arkisi but Luca is not far behind.

AS for Jeff's meteoric rise, It was totally expected. She has been #1 on Rylsky art from day one also. The number of sets is not and shouldn't be a factor. It is the overall average of member votes that determine that

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Don't pay no mind to those bogus ratings :-)
That said, I'm glad to hear it :-)

Lily is one of the reasons I joined MetArt. Her butt is out of this world.

Yes, her butt and everything else is great, but this photography is NOT!


Now this is what you call girl power. Lilly is totally hot and has a fabulous figure all over, and specially her butt. Girls have intrinsically better looking butts if they take care of themselves, but Lilly takes the prize. I gave her a 10++++ in my own mind (what's left of it at 74)and give a big thank you to Leonardo.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Best butt in the business. She needs to be issued a plaque :-)

Interesting.. stylistically, this set reminds me very much of some of Tony Murano's sets. I wonder if Murano inspired Leonardo... or vice-versa?

So good to see this delectable young lady back again. The set concentrates on her fabulous bottom and even shows a hint of girl juice! Fantastic.

Lily is a petite powerhouse. I wonder why Leonardo chose to restrict her to such a small, confining space?

Lily is the best conditioned model on met art. She must live at the gym. Those legs and that butt are some of the most perfectly formed I have ever seen. Top that with the foxiest face and knowing smile and you have the formula for irresistible! If her personality is anything like she shows here and in all of her sets she would be an amazing woman to know. I too am not a large labia fan but when it comes in a package like this it is of no importance at all.

Lily is and always has been a 10 for me.

The irresistible Lily is back once again to expose my longstanding aversion to large labia for what it is: a silly prejudice. That compact little body is so delectable I'd be insane not to dive right in. (I should have such luck.) Bless you, Lily. xoxo

As I am sure you have noticed, labia vary as much from woman to woman as do faces. I guarantee you if they were all the same it would be very boring.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

They are practically all the same when they're shaved or mostly shaved. That's why I'd like to see more pubic hair -- it's always different, adding character as well as maturity.

pubic hair are like panties, instead of show hide

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I take it you agree panties are sexy :-)

I'm with you, Doug, panties are where it's at.
I guess to be honest, they are my fetish. Panties, not thongs. ( :

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

You know they do say, fer_realz, that obstacles enhance desire. Thus clothes enhance. Not to mention all sorts of "less concrete" things in the way :-)
You might think the pubic hair police would get that -- they'd be even more eager to see what lies beneath...

I feel exactly the opposite. They all look the same when hidden by hair because you can't see the details.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I guess it depends on what you're looking at.
Sure, there'll always be differences. Generally I see more difference in pubic hair than labia, etc. I'm sensitive to body hair.
Why not have both? Hair is as much a part of the vulva as anything else.
And as I've been noting, you can move it out of the way if you want a look at what it's covering :-)

My aversion is purely psychological. It has to do with one of my ex-wives. I have experienced — happily — pussies of every description in my life (I'm no kid). I'm just put off in recent years by anything resembling my ex's cunt. As I said, psychological.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I have a feeling you're not the only one with this sort of complex on this site :-)

Indeed he is not. My aversion is purely visual. I feel that volume in this area is not an attribute and serves no useful purpose. I like delicate and perfectly formed labia that don't protrude very far. After a certain point they lose there beauty and become very unattractive to me.

Interesting thread here. Personally, I love ALL labia, and visually large protruding labia can be very exciting. In my humble opinion. But one factor not mentioned, because we (sadly) don't get to make love to these models, is that large labia FEEL good when having sex. More tissue to love you with, so to speak. But alas, a moot point since we can only look, not touch or feel.

I've exchanged thoughts with Doug before re pubic hair. All I can say is I get your bias, that's fine, but this site must be VERY frustrating for you. At least 80% of the girls are shaved if not more. Poor Doug, he suffers every day, ha ha. Oh, and on the stubble topic, I guess I go back to IF you were lucky enough to be in bed and making love to these girls, I think stubble would FEEL terrible. Pain is not one of the things I seek when having sex. That's why I say either shave or don't shave (or just trim)- but 2 to 3 day growth is prickly! :(

I agree, I guess. I've noted that in my fantasies about going down on Lorena, my face is often rubbed raw. (And wouldn't we all love to see if that would really happen?

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Stubble -- another reason not to shave.
Unless you're willing to constantly be running for the razor -- as I suppose some of these girls are.
Sheesh, the hoops they'll jump through to please men.
If they only knew they didn't have to shave for many of us.

I actually find stubble visually stimulating. The feel of it -- an acquired taste I suppose. Just be ready for it :-)

Yeah, Red, I suffer every day -- but I don't give up :-)

Most of our photographers here do a very good job when they do explicit/gyno shots. Some of us rave over "butterfly" shots, others lust of moisture being visible, etc. Especially on the pendulous labia I wonder if between the shots if "off camera" adjustments are made. As a former pro photographer I doubt what we see is always a "natural" occurrence. From my experience the more pendulous the labia the trickier it was to shot and make it look good. But then I always worried about everything in the frame. The manicure of the mode; if her hands were involved, etc. I have been told here I was should concentrate on the "goods" and not sweat the details. Oh Well...

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Yeah, but the devil is in the details.... :-)

See we will never agree on the details. We all have our own tastes and all the talk in the world won't change them. This is natures way of insuring that we all can find what we want.

Despite the details we all seem to agree that Lily is top notch.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I'd say Lily *could* be "top notch" -- again, perhaps -- I haven't seen enough of her, though I can see why she's popular.
Yeah, thank goodness we're not all drawn to the same thing. It would cause a massive traffic jam :-)

Access The Full Set Of 133 Images By Joining MetArt Today!