This gallery contains 140 images @ 39 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Not as hot as Rosachaet, but I still gotta give it a 10.

Lily is as cute as charming. Extremely cute and extraordinary charming !

Aaahh -- !

Absolutely delicious -- gets my first "10" in days !!!

Think I'll make her my new "Number One Girl".

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Having now actually had a look at some of this set, I will note Lily's pubic area is not just shaven but photoshopped, I guess for all you guys who can't stomach the real thing :-)

Yep, you could say she or at least her photog is definitely Old School! :-)

Or would that be New School :-??

Hissy-fitters, now's your moment! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

IOW, too much rez -- need to photoshop! :-)))

Or, Have rez, will photoshop :-)))

Most of u not old enuf to get that reference :-))))


The young woman was adorable!! beautiful young body; charm galore. Regarding this guy that has all these comments and says he hasn't looked at the set, shouldn't the webmaster delete all that babble? Write a blog and see if someone will read it.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

One vote for censorship! :-)
BTW, did you actually read any of that babble so that you know what you're talking about :-?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I see other stoopid votes for censorship :-)
Hey, why bring the models here when you guys would be happier over there :-?
Or maybe you already ARE over there! :-)))

Don't worry -- you don't have to learn to read! Idiots! :-)

A rare ten to Leonardo... Fantastic set! Lily has never looked better... It's probly an old set lol

A certain Italian, who some of you may recognize, tells me there is a single word to describe our contrarian. Stolido from now on that will the only reply he gets from me.

Oh, goodness:

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Being very careful to speak in code :-)

How un-stolido of you! :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

But taking everything into account, would you say you are more often un-stolido or stolido?
I guess we know your answer :-)

I´m always gonna love you,if loving means forever!!! Sorry If I sound corny, but Lily always bring that kind of thoughts to me...

Not corny, Lily has that effect on a lot of us. I am sure that she knows the lust she generates. In fact I think it's one of her best attributes. I see that look in every picture and that's what makes her irresistible. That touch of naughtiness and the knowledge of what she does to men makes her so desirable. There is no doubt in my mind that she could devastate any guy she decides is worthy of her attention.

Amazing round ass, killer booty, killer CLITORIS, Perfect Breasts, BEAUTIFUL, Perfect 10, suckable Pussy, suckable ass, Meaty Clitoris, Yummy Ass, Yummy Clitoris, Great smile, Beautiful face, Supper Sexy, Supper HOT.

I think this should go in the tags, not the comments. BTW, there were no shots anyway near close enough to see her clitoris. Do you mean labia?

I suspect he means labia, or perhaps his eyesight is far keener than ours. ( :

LillyC is looking splendid, and even Leonardo is acting like a photog for once.Lilly is definitely an expert on how to wear a bikini, and is even more of an expert on how to wear a birthday suit.

I forgot to add thet Lilly gets a 10++++

Lily has a beautiful firm, muscular body yet remains extremely feminine and sexy...

Her round buttocks & strong shapely legs are always a real turn on

I always first look for what I consider Lily's signature poses, #54 and #90. Then all the deep squats, from the front and back; she's going to give me a heart attack one of these days...I'll be smiling thou.

Imagine talking to your doc about what gave you the heart attack.... :D

I have said it before, and likely will repeat it every time that Lily, K, and Leonardo collaborate to deliver a visit like today; Lily is magnificent!

Anytime Lily shows up on the menu, she is my "model de jour".

Other than Yani A, perhaps no other model in the MAverse does the combination of cute/adorable and stunningly sexy that Lily C does.
And that butt? ...fuhgeddaboudit, she should be required to register that thing as a weapon of mass discombobulation. The way she throws it around is a marvel of nature...

Good day fer, kilroy, & hip. I don't really NEED to say anything about Lily today you all have made the same point I was thinking. How can a rather short, it says 5'3", girl project such stunning rear and leg shots. She may be the best ever from those angles.

I would say something about our new narcissistic contrarian but it would just allow him the post 5 more useless comments. But I will say this in response to his jab... "Or do you think and speak for everyone? " at hip. Well as far as I am concern hip 90% of the time does speak for all of us long time members. We are more often than not in total agreement with his views and when we are not his opinion IS always respected. I have been a member for going on 9 years and hip may senior to me. I guess it does not bother him, the contrarian, that he is making a fool of himself and has lost all credability he may have had. So I guess we will just have to suffer through his drivel, until he bores himself as much as he does us. By the way anyone knows what happened to sailor.

SW, I find that I agree with hip more than 90% of the time. There are others, yourself and fer_realz included, that also seem to get my thumbs up the vast majority of the time.

That said, nobody has been elected as the spokesperson, and in my observations, nobody has assumed that role, through tenure or otherwise. There is no seniority, in this "room" we are all equal peers. What gets my respect, more than anything, are those who in turn respect the models in their comments and are civil with the photogs.

As for Sailor, I went back and looked and it seems that his comments ended sometime in January. Whatever happened, I hope that he is okay. I also miss rags, and likewise hope that she is doing well.

Yep, I miss Sailor and Rags too....

@ kilroy and fer_realz:

I don't remember much about Sailor beyond that I enjoyed her / his comments.

rags25 said that she has a lifetime membership. I hope she didn't have another tire changing incident in back of beyond.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Why don't you ever have the courage to reply to me directly?
I'm giving you a chance right now :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I think it might have something to do with being able to dish it out but not take it :-)
And the same would apply to some others :-)

Oh, but don't let me cut you off! :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Must be pretty painful drivel to get the response it does.
And why would it be painful?
Because the truth hurts sometimes :-?

Anybody care to respond?

BTW, I'm not an automatic respecter of "seniority", obviously :-)

But I have been here commenting for about 9½ months.
How long does it take to qualify for the club? I should say clique?

Not that I want in! I thoroughly enjoy my "contrarian" "outsider" status. I think it gives me a certain objectivity others (not to say sheep) lack :-)

Or am I totally deluded?

I think I know what your answer is :-)

But please enlighten me :-)

Both Lily and her photographers, whomever they are, know that she has a first class butt and know that's one of the things the viewers want to see ... and Lily knows it too - just look at the way she shows it off. It's almost like waving a red flag in front of a bull.

I like that, MAverse. Unlike the Underverse, the MAverse cherishes female beauty and presents it to its admirers in superior fashion. Threshold... take us to the threshold! Lily does that.

Lily C is dynamite and I appreciate her athletic legs as much as anything. I always look forward to her sets.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I'm afraid I couldn't agree with you less, on a number of counts :-)

There is plenty of room for improvement here, as I and others have been noting :-)

That doesn't mean we hate MA -- we're just putting stuff in the suggestion-box called Comments.

So don't have a hissy fit!* :-)))

BTW, I haven't looked at this set. I'm rather tired of the same-old same-old from Miz' Lily :-)

Maybe this is different. I dunno :-)

*I'm not singling you out, kr! :-)

My intent was to inject some humor with the Riddick reference, not really to say that MA is perfect and all is well. Overall, its a pretty good site, but you and I both know there are some things that could be better.

You're entitled to your opinion of Lily. I happen to like her sets, even within the limitations of the photog's style. I think you should look at the set before you comment, just saying.

No offence taken, we just disagree.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I comment often under a set I haven't looked at.* In fact, there are I'd guess relatively few sets I really look at here. You might guess why.
But you'll note in at least this case I did not criticize the set -- just made a comment about Lily. Which I fear predictably set off a mini-storm.
It would give one the impression people here are pretty insecure about what they like -- or at least that they are extremely concerned about the feelings of models. Excessively so. After all, would they be modelling like this if they couldn't take a less-than-flattering comment?
I don't think so. If not, they'd best get out before they do get hurt. They're in the wrong profession.
Didn't get the Riddick ref -- I'm out of it! :-)))

*where else is one gonna comment :-?

"I comment often under a set I haven't looked at.* In fact, there are I'd guess relatively few sets I really look at here. You might guess why."...

So, in other words, you are just an antagonist...sad way to live life...

Comment-wise, I'm pretty sure you've filled up the negative side of the ledger on this site. How about a week or month of strictly positive comments? How about a week or month of strictly no comments about hair?

Is that possible for you?...

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Click my name before making an uninformed comment like that. You will look less foolish :-)
Actually read what I have said, so that you know what you're talking about.
You'd be wise to shut your own trap till then :-)

Sorry dude, you asked for it :-)
Just like me :-)

Is it possible for you to not talk about hair...for a week, or even a month?


You talk all the time about 'educating' us on the pros of being "natural", yet you don't understand--You are NOT going to change the minds of people here, any more than you or I can change a person' s sexual orientation, or a person's like or dislike for hair color, body types, height, breast size, etc...my likes/dislikes are 'built in'---and you aren't going to change them, no matter how much you try.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Heeeez baaack! :-)

To tell you the truth, at this point, I don't think it would be possible :-)

I'm not trying to change minds here -- I'm trying to promote more diversity on this site.

There are I believe a lot of people here, and potentially a lot more, who would like that.

As it is now, almost every model is denuded.

And btw, that's a big reason I don't bother to look at their sets. They're not interesting enough to me, in large part because they are denuded -- stripped of something I would find very interesting. It's sort of like built-in -- ya know what I mean :-?

Just so you understand me better, possibly.
There's method to my madness. Reason behind my insanity :-)))
Or so's I think :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Should add -- *some* denuded would be interesting enough for a change -- but to see it all the time?
Nope, not for me.
If they read comments here they know others feel to some degree like I do.
But the industry is "stuck in a rut" that is gonna take a while to climb out of...
Models, photogs, managers, owners -- not just hate-to-say sheepish viewers... :-)
We talkin' "sea change" :-)
Doesn't happen overnight, but a critical mass can make it seem so :-)

Fear not, denuded-lovers -- you'll still have plenty of bare to go with all that hair! :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

And please don't call me harebrained :-)))

Your loss not ours. Lily has been in the top 10 forever but then you fru fru the top ten just like you do everything else so why should we even care what Doug thinks?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I don't fru fru everything else you fool! :-)))
You should know better :-)*

As to whether "we" care what Doug thinks, should that not be up to each individual?

Or do you think and speak for everyone? :-)

*I'm just nailin' your careless language, hipshot :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

You obviously speak (and apparently think :-) for a lot of sheep.

Jeez, now what would that make you?

King o' the Sheep :-? :-)))

The king sheep himself! :-)))

Sorry, dude, I'm just messin' with ya :-)

I can take it, In fact I expect it every time I comment on one of your posts. I would rather be King of the sheep than the thorn in everyone's side! I speak for no one but me. If others choose to agree that is their choice. Unlike you I try to walk the path more frequently used and not offend others. It seems your mission is "TO" offend as many as possible. You obviously enjoy stirring the pot so stir away and I'll try real hard to ignore you. 8^)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Thanks for the response.
We're all here for I assume different reasons, and we all see things differently.
I am a critic -- I have a critic's point of view.
But there are some things here I like a lot -- otherwise I wouldn't be here at all.
In praise of diversity, including diversity of opinion, it would seem to me.
Within "reasonable" bounds?
Guess we can't go there, since we'll be disagreeing over what is "reasonable" :-)
But I find your response perfectly reasonable.
And btw people have every right to express their wish that I shut up, stop criticizing, etc.
I know I'm asking for it! :-)
As long as they don't actually hinder my right to say what I want, "within reason"... :-))))

Here we go again! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

BTW, when you tell the truth you are definitely gonna offend someone. Which may be another way of saying, if you don't offend someone, you aren't telling the truth... :-)

I don't try to offend as many as possible -- only a select number :-)
And to the extent they are offended, I have succeeded in telling the truth, one might think :-)

That mission accomplished, on to the next :-)

How much you wanna bet no thumbs for that! :-)))

This is a "shaved" site -- what would you expect?! :-)

Come on guys, how bout a little diversity?!

I know many of you abhor the thought of pubic hair... :-)

But really, you'll learn to luv it on a pretty girl! :-)))

I suppose I'm talking to a wall of wannabe down-thumz :-(((

"That mission accomplished, on to the next :-)"
Herein lieth the rub, Doug.
You DON'T move on to the next.
You stay on topic, again and again and again.
We WISH you'd move on to the next...

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Well, then YOU move on to the next! :-)

I respond when provoked. If I see stupid stuff, I may take exception to it.

And we already know what my pet theme iz... :-)

Your wishing "We" -- not the people I'm referring to.

I'm talking about people in dire need of information, whether they know it or not (and strikingly they often don't :-)))

So as I've said many times to you, rather than tell me to curtail it, you curtail it, and just skip my stuff, at least when you think it's more of the same. That stuff is not meant for you. It's meant for others.

You have the right to say whatever the heck you want, Doug, and nobody can stop you.
However, you will notice one big difference between the vast majority of your posts, and the majority of most other commenters' posts.
I refer to diversity of topics.
I probably fail at this, but I try to keep my comments interesting by making a practice of repeating myself minimally. I try to come up with something original for each set I comment on, that is relevant to that set, or at very least, to the model herself.
I'm not saying I'm 100% successful, but I TRY not to get on peoples' nerves by repeating myself ad nauseam.
And I'm not going to claim that I don't have "hobby horses" of my own, like you have the reeducation mission about body hair.
For example, the most obvious hobby horse of mine, is my thing for panties.
But, unlike you, I don't make a comment EVERY SINGLE DAY advocating more panty shoots.
I probably make a comment or two every week or two. Probably enough to be obnoxious to some other members, but you'll note that I haven't yet been asked by multiple members to pipe down on that subject.
On the other hand, Doug, there is a close to 90% certainty that ANY post you make is going to be on the subject of models keeping their body hair.
You, unlike me, have been requested by multiple members multiple times not to shut up, but to talk about SOMETHING ELSE.
You are under no obligation to oblige us ~ but I think you can understand why your quest has become so tiresome to the rest of us.
What's WRONG with talking about multiple subjects, and trying to say something that most other members can accept, even if they don't agree?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

There's a reason for my constantly talking about body hair these days. More than one, actually. But I think pubic hair et al is a little more essential and of greater importance to my view of things than panties are to yours.
Just have a look at the passions my comments arouse -- the threat they apparently pose -- and you'll see what I mean.
A bush is like the tip of the iceberg, so to speak.

Sorry, folks, rather than beat on me to shut up about it, just skip on by -- you just fan the flames with your uncomprehending comments, which I am then further compelled to enlighten.

And btw fer_realz, you in particular should know I speak and have spoken at length about myriad other things. So again, you're falling into the same black & white trap as many others here, painting me over with too broad a brush.
Shame on you! :-)
Not that you're not a good guy! :-))

Yep, folks, I's pushin' for change. If you've heard my message, and don't wanna hear no mo', nobody is forcing you to hear it again.
But if you want to say something to me, by all means do so.
I'm glad to try to hear you and respond :-)

We are NOT beating up on you, Doug, and if you'll re-read my last comment (the one you just responded to) you'll see I did not accuse you of ONLY writing about body hair, but of writing about body hair MOST of the time, "90%" was the estimate I used, but it was only an estimate.
Do you seriously disagree that 9 out of 10 of your comments are about shaving/not shaving?
If you disagree, then you'll never understand my take on this.
I wish you'd re-read my statements about why what you do is so abrasive to the rest of us.
It isn't that we disagree with you ~ although many do ~ it is only the sheer repetitiveness of it.
Let it rest for awhile, talk to us about SOMETHING, ANYTHING else, and you'll find you make friends.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Ah, sorry, but some of you is definitely beating on me. Come on, can't you read?

I don't care -- go ahead and beat! I'm a masochist! :-)

And again dude, take a look at what I've said over my time here. It'll take you hours.

It only seems that way, because that is what you focus on -- what I have been focused on of late.

Why do you argue? What are you arguing about? What is your point?

I'm gonna say what I wanna say, whether you like it or not!

It's not meant for you. I already know where you stand.
I think :-)
Do you know where you stand?
I'm not sure :-)
You seem sorta on the fence about a lotta things.

Except about how much I comment about hair :-)

Dude, you tell me to get off it?
Try getting off it yourself :-)

And btw, I am a provocateur. But nooobody has to read me.
My provocations are targeted. Turn comments off, skip by mine.
Why get beatin' up for nuthin'?

But I can't be friends with someone who insists I not say what I think, what I want to say.

Get real, fer_realz :-)

I'd think I'm not the only one into masochism here! :-)))

By the way, Doug, you didn't answer my question:
Do you deny that somewhere around 9 out of 10 of your comments are about body hair/shaving/not shaving?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I deny or doubt that, but we'd have to go through reams of commentary.

It is one of my main themes, though, intimately related to KL.

The wiping out of body hair we've witnessed over the last decade is a big deal to me :-)

OK, Doug, you don't have to agree with me, it simply isn't important enough of a point for me to go back through your comments myself and count how many of them are about hair and shaving and how many of them are not.

However ~ I hope that you can agree that ~ to most of us other members ~ this is the perception.

If we were to take a member poll, probably the vast majority of the members would agree that approx. 9 out of 10 of your comments concern body hair, its removal and/or shaving.

Really, whether or not that is actually the case is not important. The APPEARANCE is that you are a "single-issue poster."

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

So be it.
I'm not here to please them.
At least directly :-)
And as I've said at least once before I think...
they don't have to read me! :-))
What, now, really, could be simpler?

U see, well, maybe u don't --
u don't grasp what I'm up to.
What my reason for being here is.
I've given you a number of hints, but you cannot grasp it, because it is so different than the reason you are here.

I am going to be me, fer_realz, -- that's the bottom line.
My sense is that you are trying to talk me out of that, of whatever it is I am up to.
Do you think that's wise :-?

You may. I'm just lettin' you know I have no plans to let up on bein' me :-)))

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Or, one man's reason is another man's folly :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

...and one man's clique another man's hornets' nest :-)))

Applause! Where's my applause? Where are *my* thumbs :-?

Oh, yeah, I'm not part of the in-crowd! :-))))

Nope, it's as simple as this:
You want a thumbs up?
Say something that someone agrees with, and you'll get a thumbs up.

@ fer_realz:

I sometimes dole out thumbs to members (even those who would never suspect that I doled them one).

Other times I choose to express myself in writing.

I continue to think that the written word is the best way to communicate here.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Have you ever noticed you can give a thumb to your own comment?

Kinda makes ya wonder about those singleton thumbs! :-))

Yes indeed the written word can be most effective :-)

I NEVER thumbs up my own comment, just like I never "like" any of my posts on FB. I think it's cheating, even a petty kind of cheating. But I don't do it... and I assume I'm not the only person with the same standard.
You can't assume that just because you imagine something, someone is doing it, Doug.
That comes very close to accusing a total stranger you know nothing about, of doing something you have no way of knowing whether they did or not.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Touchy touchy! Who accused you of it?
Not me.
Consider the meaning of your defensiveness, my friend! :-)

You did not accuse ME of doing it, Doug.
But your implication was that a lot of the members do it. On only the strength of the fact that you can IMAGINE someone doing it ~ so you assume that many others ARE doing it. That is weak logic, and betrays a sad and judgmental view of other people.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Read what I actually said :-)
I think you overreacted, and to me that's telling.
And you're still overdoing it :-)

I'm more cynical than you. That is all :-)))

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I really don't care if I get a thumb or not :-)
I don't tailor what I say to get them :-)

What is striking though is that now the up-thumbs are being deployed to express what the down-thumbs used to...

People automatically give a thumb up to someone who says something -- anything -- against the commentator they do not like.

A very interesting -- and stoopid -- development :-)))

Or so it seems to me :-)

"I really don't care if I get a thumb or not :-)
I don't tailor what I say to get them :-)"

~ then why do you whine about not getting them?
Either shut up about not getting them, or try a little harder to write a comment other members will agree with.
It's as simple as that.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

U don't get the joke, my little pal :-)

Sorry! :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

And read what I said just previous to your comment.

I'm just noting what I think is sheepish* behavior, not that I crave approval, especially of sheep! :-))))

*what's a better word for a piling-on group-think conformity :-?

But I know I'm asking for it, since the denuded style prevailing on this site is something almost all you guys like enough to pay for.

't ain't why I'm here, as I've said ad nauseam :-)

Ooo but I would luuuvz to change the world... :-)))

What if it's not "piling on" at all, and not "group-think conformity" at all, but rather ~ and you HAVE to admit that this is at LEAST a possibility, Doug...
What if....
What if a thumb is only a thumb? A gesture of agreement?
One grown-up, think for himself, adult member says something that another grown-up, think for himself, adult member agrees with, so he gives a thumbs up? And then another grown-up, think for himself, adult member agrees too, and adds his thumbs up? And then a third, and a fourth, etc.
Even you have to admit there is a POSSIBILITY that this is all that is going on.
It seems to me that one recurring theme in many of your comments is your serious doubt that anyone else other than you ~ the members, the photographers, the administrators of the sites, even the models themselves ~ is a fully grown-up, thinking for themselves, adult human being who has their own opinions and does not look to others for it.
As much as I like you, and I do, I do find that persistent strain in your commentary to be offensive and disrespectful.
I don't think you are even aware of this, but it comes through loud and clear in your remarks.
You think the other members are sheep, you think the models are sheep... it is very annoying.
I prefer to assume until I know otherwise that another person that I do not know is a fully functioning, intelligent, adult human being with independent opinions of their own.
I'm not saying that EVERYONE is ~ I am saying that is how I regard someone until they prove otherwise.
And MOST people do not disappoint me.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

From what I've seen on this site there's little possibility of what you're suggesting :-)
I'm quite serious about that. There aren't many here who express themselves as thoughtfully as you do.
Many who reply to me directly remind me of children who need to be "straightened out" :-)
And I believe a lot of their level of thinking is behind the thumbs I'm referring to. Except wise or not enough not to actually say something to me.

To answer your question! I didn't yet get to the second part of your response! :-)))

Indeed. See above :-)))

I think you're giving many of these guys too much credit :-)
Thaz OK! That is your view, and you are who you are. A little soft-headed, maybe, but a good guy :-) A nice person! :-))
I'm a different sorta hard-boiled egg, at least in some circumstances :-)
And it takes all kinds.

As I've said before, I calls 'em like I sees 'em. Respect just gets in the way of that. That is not to say I don't admire and "respect" some things on this site etc.
But they have to earn my respect. They don't automatically get it.
And I think there's room for that here. We don't all have to be the same (respectful hat-in-hand church-goers :-)))
Note that well. Be sure to draw some distinctions in what I say.
I was just reading today, yesterday, my "review" of KL's Lustroso. Read it -- you don't have to refer to the pics -- and you'll see what I mean.
But after all, she's the only reason I'm here... :-))))
Itz gonna be me, of course, but its also gonna be very high praise :-)

BTW, that's a nice starting point you have with other people, not very much unlike my own. But when they start expressing themselves, this can be where things start going downhill fast :-)))

You wanna see what I mean, look over my first back and forth here, on KL's Pikno 8/25/13...
You can find it in other commentary on her sets.
Again, the primary reason I'm here... :-)

But here's the thing, Doug.

Again ~ whether or not you THINK we are intelligent, independent, self-thinkers who express our own emotions, and are not simply brainwashed sheep ~ whether or not you agree with me that this is the case ~

Logically speaking, and you are an intelligent person so you must agree to follow logic within an argument ~ logically speaking, you HAVE to admit that this is a POSSIBILITY.

That doesn't mean that you're agreeing that we ARE independent and mature and intelligent, and that does not mean you agree with our opinions.

All that it means is that you admit that there is a POSSIBILITY that the reason you're not getting more thumbs is that most members who bother to thumb or not thumb simply don't agree with you.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

It's a *latent* possibility! :))))

Hey, btw, be careful of seeming to talk for so many "we"s -- you're soundin' too much like hipshot, who now at least admits he's speaking just for himself.

You're starting to look like the hero bent on saving MA from Doug! :-))

I think that you're just trying to defend yourself...

That's cool. I'd do the same! :-)))

As far as thumbs go, just have a look at the typical quality of comments that get the most thumbs.

Plus I see thumbs supporting outright nastiness, from commentators professing to be above it :-)

As I've said, without down-thumbs, they gotta do somethin' :-)

Lemme ask you, fer_realz -- do you deny the possibility of stupidity and all that follows from it in this world of human beings?

Somehow I doubt you do. You sure sound like it, defending it at all costs! :-)))))

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Let me try that another way:
do you deny the possibility of good old human dumbness, folly, mis-taking something for something else?

You seem to :-)))

But maybe the appearance is misleading :-)))

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

There's strength in a bunch o' little thumz! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Indeed, I don't love (nothing but) denuded pussy!
What the hell am I doing here then?
Please don't make me explain once again :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

And btw I keep seeing these thumbs for stupid comments applauded because they are against me.
Thought brilliant and admirable by fools :-)
Cheered by nitwits.
Can't you guys be a little more sophisticated?
No way :-)
Consider the source. When I think of what you are happily paying for here, it sez all I need to know about you :-)
Twerps, with an "e" to satisfy fer_realz :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Oh but the good life is as simple as garnering a MA thumb. Justifies your existence, too! :-)))
As I said, I'd rather tell the truth and forgo those shiny green thumbs :-)))

Unfortunately a pure routine photo shooting. I'm used to see more inspiration of both Lily & Leonardo.

Gorgeous, super hot girl! I know there are some who prefer all nude sets, but I love a sexy strip tease! Lily looks so hot getting out of her bra and panty!

Ah, Lily my lady! This is her 35th set here on met and I have downloaded each and every one! This is my dream girl. There are dozens of lovely ladies on Metart, all of which I would be thrilled to date and who fill my fantasies but there is only one lily. This is my original Ukrainian goddess and my heart still pounds each and every time I see a new set posted. Her face is enchanting and her eyes and that knowing smile could melt me like hot butter. That alone would be sufficient but it is only part of the story. Lily has the most fantastic body on the planet! she is so buff and supremely conditioned that I can hardly pull my eyes away from those exquisite calf's and magnificent thighs, that awesome but, flat tummy and those magnificent girl parts. She is the total package, compact and rock hard yet as perfectly feminine as any woman here. Want a girl that makes heels look fantastic call Lily. This woman knows her effect on men and just how to work it. Shots like 65 put almost any model in Lily's wake. That is the most perfect backside anywhere.

I love you Lily! Always!

Agree on all points. If you are a leg/butt man, Lily certainly has them, but that is not all. She really is the total package.

This is Lily and her sparkling best. I don't think I've ever seen her smile so much and she is obviously enjoying herself.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Feeona's gonna be jealous :-)

Hear Hear! I couldn't have said it better.

Excellent set of Lily pictures.

Access The Full Set Of 140 Images By Joining MetArt Today!