This gallery contains 138 images @ 20 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Wonderful views of her beautiful pussy and ass from behind. Love that she is shaved. She would be absolutely delicious.

  • Mr R
  • 2 months ago:

Mango is my favorite Met Art girl. She is just so beautiful in every way. This is a lovely set.

I have to say of all the great sets here at Met Art this has to be my all time favorite!
First of all Mango is one of my favorites and this set is shot too perfection!
Excellent detail and clarity in the photos so you can see every inch of her incredible body, none of that soft focus, blurry photography that so many of the photographers here at Met Art are so found of and which I hate.
Mango is totally nude from head to toe, everything on display, the way all models should be shot.
But what sets this above all others is the amount of full body shots, with so many nice close ups of her exquisite bare soles!
There are many models here at Nirvana that possess very sexy bare feet but mango's are perfect!
She is a foot man's dream come true, perfectly shaped, with smooth, soft, wrinkly bare soles and pretty, suckable toes.
Too see those super sexy bare soles displayed from so many different angles and with such great detail that every wrinkle can be seen is a dream come true.
I wish every set here at Met Art was shot just like this.
Thank you Vlad for an incredible set!

Thank You Mango, you too Vlad but mostly Mango..

Super Panty Play!

Very nice job Kleverov!!! Nothing to say about Mango... She's a Girl to die for from Head to Toes from Outside to Inside!!! The towels with a form like a swan remember me Thailand. I have just been on holiday for three weeks there. I saw also Dogs and Elephants made with towels:-) But the swan is perfect for Mango:-) She's a dream Mermaid... Kisseli Kisseli to You and come back soon, please:-)

I think this is the best Mango set I have seen. She is absolutely radiant here. I am not a fan of the beach sets. I feel she is wasted there. I know she is tanned and lovely and all that but I got to the point where it was yawn, another Mango beach set. Here you get a better sense of her feminine side and WOW the effect is mind boggling! I saw a whole new Mango here that I had never fully appreciated before. The panty shots are some of the best panty shots I seen here but the piece du resistance is that magnificent butt. Combine that with the panties and you have some of the best rear shots ever. #17 is staggering! 25, 38, 40, 42 are all so perfect that it brings tears to my eyes. This is the set I have been waiting for. Mot just from Mango but all the Met models. Finally an artist and model that understands the power of a perfect pubic area covered just enough to accent rather than detract from her perfection. Others I am sure will disagree but Mango is perfectly groomed and immaculate and I could look at those shots all day. IMHO they are every bit as powerful as the nude shots. For me sitting near that bed simply watching her sleep in those panties would be the ultimate dream come true. Photo #10 is so serene I would be reluctant to disturb her even though my hormones would be raging. I really don't like the panty shots where she pulls them into her crotch, to me that always seems sort of cheap and over the top.

So in this case it's not all about pussy though there are some great intimate closeups of that delicate pink flower. I think this set was done just right. Lots of fore play and just enough of the "good" stuff. It didn't leave me craving a thing.

Kudos's to both Mango and her photographer for what I feel is her best set ever.

I gotta agree about the panty/thong pulling shots, hipshot, I've never understood the appeal of that either. However, I have to admit there seem to be plenty of people who find it erotic. I don't know why, but I probably never will. ( :

It's a "Snapple fact"... The most consumed fruit on the planet...MANGO!!
Is it any wonder why....? ;o) Very engaging set!

I'd consume that fruit all day long! :))))

Gotta say it looks tangy and juicy. I'm right there with ya...

Panties posed to perfection.
16, 17, 18, 135, 136, 137 Inexplicably rarely seen poses here sublime
A PP Parade for la grande Bellezza
Condolences to our fellow suffering from lagrandebellezzaphobia, also known as having the heebee GB's.
The angles for the Pillow Mount were not quite there and Mount Mons was not quite captured.
Plenty of light that plays on the skin while respecting retinas.

Why I come here.

You are on one fine roll, sir.
Tip of my hat to you. ( :

The appearance of Dido and Mango on the same day is a red letter day for me. Two of my very favs at once. Dido's set today is somewhat of an anniversary she was introduced to us here by Erro 7 years ago yesterday. Almost too many sets to count all over the family of sites and beyond. She has been shot by many of our best artist and has delivered for all and is still great. Mango is here for the 18th time and as I pointed out in my last comment with every set shot by her partner Vlad. Ironically this is also almost an anniversary for her also she first appeared 2 years ago on you got it 6-12-12. Both Mango/Clover and Dido/Lola have much the same appeal clothed hard to belief this is there profession yet when they get bare they are both stellar performers. The final irony is that one of the top video artist on Sex has done two movies titled "Be My Slave" both G/G bondage offerings (Should be obvious from the title) and guess what Dido was the sub in his first, and Mango in his second. Away from here they both have great massage sets/movies. And both have done B/G work. (Yes I intentionally posted this both for Mango and for Dido.)

YIKES! Sooooo,Pic #75 Just made my day. What a set!

YIKES!Pic#22 is amazing!

YIKES!Pic#22 is amazing!

Mango is absolutely gorgeous.

It's a very difficult trick to pull off being so wholesome looking and so damn sexy at the same time and yet Mango pulls it off flawlessly.

The perfect woman !

  • Zane
  • 2 months ago:

Vlad, you are one lucky man. Your girlfriend is amazing!

Now that is one tiny, but tasty looking pink butterfly.
Incidentally, just imagine checking into your hotel, walking into your room and seeing the greeting in image #5....


You've got to be kidding!

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

No sexual hair, among other things :-(

Not that I'm an expert on this set or Mango. I've skipped on by -- not my type. Am here for other reasons :-)

Don't let me spoil your enjoyment! :-))))

the gadfly ☺

pre occupance with pussy is rampart.These are beautifull girls with eyes,face,breasts.legs and more importantly an X factor which makes the difference between stunning and mind blowing ,this often depends on the photographer,the boyfriend has achieved this.Mango has got achieved a beach look inside.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Another censored comment resurrected:

Beware of the MetArt Taliban tho :-)

The moral enforcers :-)

It's their way or the highway!

They will support censorship :-(

That said, I agree with you that "all" parts of a good-looking young woman should be celebrated here.

That includes body hair, btw :-)

the explorer ⚡

Please don't keep illustrating what I'm saying! Then maybe I won't have to keep saying it.

@ Doug:

I have empathy and completely agree with MET on what appears might have happened in this specific instance.

Those fundamentalist like believers are ruthless and known to employ a fatwa at the hint of an insult.

Just ask Salman Rushdie or witness the destruction of the oldest (1700 years) and largest (53 meter high) statue of Buddha known to have existed.

This word is probably best left unsaid at an adult erotica site.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Right, but you can see how they got carried away with the knife and started cutting "innocent" stuff too.

It probably is better left unsaid, but the strong reactions to it I suspect may be damning :-)

The Taliban I refer to are the people who want to see nothing but praise on this site and who get whipped in debates particularly with me.

Some have run to the office in a teary huff complaining :-)))

The shoulda thought before they talked! :-)))

It's not just me they seek to chide, it's anybody who has the temerity to present a negatively honest or irreverent opinion.

They want conformity to their churchy ideals :-)

Etc :-)))

the sinner ☺

BTW, Doug, on the subject of "censorship" (which, I agree with Baggy that this particular instance was a fully justified legal protective move by MA, considering the fact that they want to continue publishing and not be taken off the net, and I want them to continue as well) I am also a member of a non-Met network site where one is allowed to comment, but the comments are submitted and then reviewed by the webmaster before they are posted. Some comments are not considered suitable and so never see the light of day; others are edited per their legal policy.
Would you rather the comment section here be like that, or remain as open and free (comparatively speaking) as it is now?
If you don't want to submit your comments to a pre-publication censor, then some judicious caution might be warranted. Because I suspect that a move to that model of controlled comment forum might be MA's next move, if the particular instance under current question is repeated.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I'll let u answer that question :-)

That could be -- I'm warning them against it :-)

See K below, however.

If u wanna thus be hampered in what you say here because of that fear, be my guest. To me, the site as is would not be worth saving in that case.

It's all an overreaction basically to yours truly, the big bad hairy beast who speaks his mind :-)

This other stuff -- red herrings, and further attempts to shut me up.

As for that other site of yours, is it hairy :-? :-)))))

It isn't hairy or un, it has models of all variety of trim. ( : As with Met, most come to it shaved, and some shave for their sets. But hairy is not discouraged.
As for their comments forum, there is very little back and forth discussion, as you can imagine. The spontaneity of "conversation" is quite easily disturbed. It's nowhere near as fun to participate in.
That's why I don't want to see this comments forum changed into that kind and why I ask you not to make that particular reference again.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:


I've been told by the head honcho that further discussion from me concerning the "p" word will get me "silenced" so that I will no longer be able to comment here.

So your request aside, I'm taking his warning seriously :-))

I think it's too bad discussion about it has been disallowed; it suggests to me a queasy vulnerability indicating a bigger problem than I knew. And I don't think prohibiting talk about it is the way to make it better.

That said, this ain't Dr Phil... :-)))

Let's just hope this ban ain't the tip of the iceberg, with more to follow. If they want a popular site, they need to facilitate "popular" commentary... :-)

I see that tags are now apparently going to be subject to editing. So fer_realz, hang around -- you may get your wish for a less-free site! :-)))

Not that I give a whit about tags... :-)

For what it's worth,
a) I agree, forbidding discussion about the forbidden topic does not "solve" the problem.
b) I understand your extreme distaste at this not-solution.
c) in a perfect world, we would be perfectly free to discuss ANY topic of ANY nature in ANY amount of detail necessary, without our right of free expression being trammeled in ANY way.
Having said so....
You do realize... (do you not?)
this is not a perfect world!
Unfortunately, there ARE severe legal consequences to being associated with activity supporting that particular thing.
....You do realize that, right?
In other words, deciding that discussion of that particular subject and that particular subject alone, while it IS an infringement of our right to free expression... is NOT excessive or punitive or personal.
You get that, right?
PLEASE tell me you get that, Doug?
Quite aside from our favorite site remaining open for our enjoyment, there is also the jobs of those who work here to consider as well.
Just like I agree with the Supreme Court ruling that our Constitutional right to free speech does not extend as far as allowing us to maliciously go into a crowded theater and yell "fire", I see this as a similar instance of prudent business practice to protect the ongoing operation of this site and the jobs that depend on it. I really do.
If you cannot or will not understand that... I am speechless.
Nobody who lives and operates in the real world with real life consequences for actions thinks that they have completely untrammeled rights to do ANYTHING at ANY time regardless of consequences. The real world just does not operate that way!
You get that, right?

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Tell me about it not being a "perfect" world! :-))

People here are guiltier than I imagined! :-))

But seriously, do you really think I need your lecture?

Guess so :-)))

I think you're overdoing your defense of censorship!

If it were really as bad as it's been made out to be, we would have heard about it before it was mentioned, or at least soon thereafter.

It's OK. We're not gonna breathe the word again. We don't want anybody thrown into jail or onto the street! :-))

Just had a look at KL's "new" set on Stunning 18 :-)

Now, what chance would you give of her getting back with Mr R... :-?

For me, the real problem isn't "the word." The real problem is using the comments forum as a venue to express insults for other members rather than addressing ideas expressed by them. Once the insults start flying, the anger goes out of control and stupid words like "the word" start getting bandied about, needlessly.
If we all would restrain ourselves from indulging the ~ very, very appealing ~ temptation to throw insults, call names and get angry rather than discuss... I think incidents like that would not ever have happened.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I will "agree" with you there -- the "p" word prob is something of a red herring. An excuse to crack down :-)

Insults -- it all depends on how you deal with 'em. You can shut one down in a hurry with a good answer. In fact, a lot of times seems to me the person who "insults" is looking for a good answer -- a reason to respect the "insulted."

Curse or challenge? That is the question about anything that happens to us :-)

As GWB liked to say, Bring it on! :-)))))

I noticed you beat me to Kristel's new set... I SWEAR it was not there last night when I checked! I wonder if Clemens' site is on a slightly different schedule than the other MA family sites?
I don't know about R, but I do recall K mentioning recently that she has requested new sets of her... if it were to her directly, perhaps she could pick her favorite photographer, were she of the inclination? I hope it would be with R but it would be interesting to see how other photographers would handle her. ( :

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

It showed up today -- actually yesterday.

In any event I believe she isn't modeling because she's wearing braces. Or, at best, that they have recently come off, and maybe she's thinking of getting back into the game.

R has told me she'll never be his model again. I don't know why. I've been trying to persuade her, in comments, to get back with him, because he does a lot more for her artistically than Sironi and especially Clemens, to say nothing of Femjoy. I suspect one of the problems is that Rylsky made her work too hard. Was in a sense too demanding.

But he's gotten waaay better shots of her. No comparison, tho Sironi has his share of good ones.

All the Clemens stuff so far seems to me shot around the time of the early Sironi sets -- Corasida ⟶ Autografo notably. I.e., they are far from "recently shot."

To be honest, I would like to see what DG could do with her, or even Matiss. I know Matiss gets beat up a lot but I like his/her style. And there's at least one other photographer who's been on a real roll lately but I can't remember who. Oh well, no biggie.

I wonder if Kristel was just modeling to make some money for school or bills? To be entirely honest, she doesn't look like she was ever entirely comfortable with the process, with any of the photographers, IMO. Maybe she just quit when she stockpiled enough dough.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

If you wanna see her havin' comfy fun with Sironi, see

If you wanna see her not havin' comfy fun with Sironi, see

If you wanna see her havin' fun with Rylsky, see

If you wanna see her not havin' as much fun with Rylsky, see

She's enjoying herself with Rylsky in the Feb '14 publication PINNATE, and not so much in the March '14 publication TOPPET.

Any more questions :-??

the KL expert ☺♡

BTW, she is exceptionally soft and beautiful in some Gratiam and Savell images.
You get a sense comments have touched her...

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Take a look at what she says in her bio. I think it may be pretty revealing -- honest in an unusual way.

If what it says is true, she already was a model and an actress. And I've always thought she's very gifted as an "erotic" model. She's well-named because her feelings are so fluidly expressed -- even if they may be somewhat mysterious. And now we know she was hiding her teeth -- the one "certain" source of discomfort for her.

Yep, she was definitely here to make money :-) One of the reasons she left Rylsky was to make more quick "bucks" with Sironi and Femjoy. And as we now see, Clemens. Once her teeth are "fixed", we'll see what happens. Maybe :-)

I could be wrong, but she looks to me like a highly intelligent person. She might figure enough's enough of this game -- I've got the rest of my life to live.

If so, she can revel in my praise, et al, for the rest of her life! :-)))))

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Should say seems to me the Clemens sets I've seen were shot around the time of all of Sironi's except for the last 3: Devoto, Gratiam, Savell. Which btw are the last MA sets of hers shot.
I believe Kristel came back to life beginning with Devoto, I think in part because by then she had read or been informed about some very positive comments. Until then, the comments feature didn't exist.

the speculator ☺

Thanks for reminding me of her sets with Sironi, I had forgotten those. I need to go back and take another look at them.

I certainly hope the positive feedback from the comments section helped her feel good about posing! I'd like to think our comments have a positive influence, not just conversations with each other. ( :

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I "talk" to her and all of them, including photogs, as if what I say may matter to them.
And I have seen indications it sometimes does.

After all, how much impact can somebody's words have on you? I don't see this potential being any different when it comes to words to a model or photog -- assuming they are "heard" and "understood" :-)

Indeed, that is the trick, Doug... the impression I get is that K pays pretty close attention to the comments and some of the artists do as well ~ "the usual suspects" ~ Rylsky, Catherine, DG, and sometimes Arkisi and a few of the others. Many of the photographers I think don't know about the comments or don't care to pay attention, and virtually none of the models, unless the photographer passes them along to her. Patricity is apparently an exception. I'm trying to remember if any other models have dabbled in the comments?
So, as to whether or not any of the models see our comments... frankly, I think it's a crap shoot. Not that it isn't worth addressing them anyway.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I think more models pay attention to or are aware of comments than you think :-)
I think most if not all the photogs do. But only some actually respond with comments.
We know models reply on RA. I've heard of one or two who have on SA.

Think many of the models let their modeling do the talking. Actions speak louder than words. They have their reasons for remaining silent.

Wouldn't it be great to actually know instead of just speculate :-?

To see one has to use imagination and insight -- and even then he could be totally wrong :-))))

...we have to remember, after all, that many of the models model only once or twice, as amateurs, and probably don't even know about this site, or which sites their photographers submit their photos to. Even many of the "pros" I am quite certain are probably not aware of very many individual sites that house their material.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Would they really be that uncurious :-?

I'm really just thinking of models I focus on and address here -- not all that many.

More often than not "Rylsky" models.

Often I'm simply talking to "everybody", and if the model hears, good! :-))

Comments are the windows into the souls of customers. Smart "content creators" would do well to pay attention to them, at least on occasion :-)

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I'm biased toward the power of Comments. After all, they are one of the two reasons I am here :-)))

the scribe ✐

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

One more thing which you may be keeping more in mind than me: the language barrier. We're writing in often idiomatic English. How many models are gonna make the effort to decipher what we're saying?
Only the ones who really wanna know! :-)

I've been hoping KL does :-)

Indeed... in fact, the other day a fellow member with whom I am a FB friend cued me into a website where one of our MA photographer has material. It was a nice find but the problem was it is a Russian site, in Russian. So the navigation was tricky, to say the least. ( :
I would love to have gotten to know the site better but it's a problem when you don't know what button or link to click on... ( :

...that being said, it would be nice if, as one of the "perks" of being published on MA, every model got a free membership, if only to allow them to look at her set and the comments it inspires. I wonder if anyone at MA has considered this as a possibility?
Theoretically, if the models were actively empowered or encouraged to dabble in the comments section, it would encourage more of the members to participate as well...

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

They can look for free if they want to. If they wanna say something they gotta pay the big rubles :-))*

Yeah, so the big question for me is has anything I've said to KL made any difference to her? I kinda love her like a dangerously sexy daughter :-)

In my Savell comments I said: "Quit, Kristel. Do something else with your life."

Didn't mean it, baby! :-))))

Actually I was quite serious, but I didn't know about the braces at the time...

Anyway, she's a helluva nice dream, deflowered or not :-))

*I see their participation in comments as a possible evolutionary development of this site...

That would certainly be nice. As you noted, several models have made a comment or two on RA sites. I believe some have participated on SA as well...

@ Doug:

I must learn to read more deeply into member's writings ~ rather than just the words themselves.

I neither like nor use smilies / emoticons etc, but someone recently wrote that so much of face to face communication is enhanced by body language and tone of voice; and the light went on.

I can't see myself using emoticons very much, I tried with one for speechless; but speechless as written needs no shorthand imho. Another reason I don't like them is cause and effect, I don't know which one means what and I resent having to search for what they mean; entirely my bad, but I am an old dawg and choose not to learn SOME new tricks.

Another light has gone on for me during this lively shit storm (and I knew / predicted it c / would happen long ago in a reply to a comment from rags25).

I suspect many of the removed comments were collateral damage and went along for the ride when MET punted some top level comments for whatever reason.

Baggy: I said that about communication under Eliav's set. It was taken from a training class, and it didn't just say that face-to-face communication is enhanced by body language, it said it is the major component. Their point was that so much is lost in text only, such as emails.

I don't use the emoticons that much, only when I feel I need to emphasize that I am joking.

The part about your (and others) comments being collateral damage being contained in the same thread is confirmed by K below.

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

I think of 'em sometimes as assisting the "it's-not-what-you-say-but-how-you-say-it" idea.

IOW, since we're just disembodied words here they seek to put a face on them -- a smile, a frown, a suggestive symbol.

If they're indecipherable they're useless :-) ←(smile :-)

I have a character palette that has a bunch of miscellaneous symbols I've been enjoying of late ☺

Right -- collateral damage. Damage still.
I hope they let up on the censoring hand asap. One of the attractions of a forum such as this is the sense you can freely express yourself. Once that is lost it may not be recoverable.

I think Jon agrees with that.

Banning a word just makes it more tempting to use. Once people know what it is, it gets in their heads like forbidden fruit. So that's another reason I wouldn't ban it. But I guess it's too late.
Let's hope we don't go too far down the slippery slope :-)

Hi Doug,

I know that some members are very upset that some comments were removed.

All of us who work on the sites, were very pleased when we finally added this feature for our members. However we all agree, that comments should still have an appropriate decorum as any other business would. If you walk into a grocery store and start yelling obscenities, I am certain you would be asked to leave. We are not censoring opinions, suggestions, negative critiques, etc. All we ask is that when our members are addressing others they do this respectfully just as most of us would face to face.

Yesterday for some reason we had a couple of members throwing completely unnecessary and vulgar words around that have no place here. Unfortunately when we removed the offensive comments, the entire thread goes with it. If any comments were reasonable that got removed, we apologize for this. All I can say about that is do not be tempted to feed the trolls and attach a reply to theirs. Rest assured though we are not going to start being the "words police".

  • Doug
  • 2 months ago:

Those trolls as any troll deserve to be answered well if possible! :-))

Just look at how guys have attempted to respond to yours truly! :-)))

I think what you're saying is avoid ad hominem attacks on or responses to another. Which I seriously try to do (most of the time :-)

That isn't to say I haven't "teased" people with names.

Censorship is a slippery slope, and understanding what is actually being said, especially by understanding its context, is vital before one starts removing what people have written here. I've seen some amazingly offensive MA commentary -- stuff that would put what I have said to shame, IMOSHO :-), and yet the world did not end. By and large people saw it for what it was and handled it well. Then they moved on.

So again I appreciate what you say, and what Jon has said, but I would just caution you to do what you can, bend over backwards, even, to keep this "forum" free. Use and trust in the minds it has to keep it in decent order. Be patient and let things fix themselves. It will be better than a censor deciding what is best.

A wonderful set of this stunning, tanned beauty. It is great to see Mango off the beach for a change and in the bedroom.

The panty shots are quite awesome & once she loses them, you would need to look very hard to find a prettier set of labia anywhere...

More of this beautiful girl soon - preferably in the bedroom! 10/10

A fine set from start to finish. Mango is looking beautiful. Well done Vlad and Mango.

The tanned darling is indeed arousing! I measure the erotic content
of a set by the "tickling factor". And now it tickles under the balls! And the thong is fantastic!!

Mango A is even more enchanting indoors in a nice simple bedroom like you would expect in a Mediterranean resort. I really like the headband and the fine little gold chain, I was raised in the 60's and she looks very hippy flower child in this set. I am really glad that the small lovely thong stayed on long enough for us to get some great panty shots! To many of the artists here are to eager to show the pussy and and either give us just a couple of cursory shots and then gone or start with no panties at all. She has a beautiful little butterfly and I would scream bloody murder if we didn't get to see it but I love panty shots. Looking at that cleft in a nice almost see through pair of panties really enhances the fantasies for me. I like when a girl makes a game of resisting before allowing you to remove them. To me that is a real turn on! Mango A is a dream girl for sure. The classic surfer girl. 10+++ for this set

  • H WU
  • 2 months ago:

Mango's tanned body is very sexy.She also looks gorgeous with that g-string pulling her up her pussy.

Mango and Vlad,

Mango you are as beautiful and free as ever! Thank you for a stunning indoor location :) I love your outdoor shoots, but indoor locations so much too. My criticism here is that there are just too many close-ups and medium shots focusing on specific features of Mango. Additionally, Mango is facing away from the camera perhaps more often than not. I would have loved more shots that played to Mango's strengths. That is, more full body, and more close-ups and medium shots showing Mango face :)

Thank you again guys. Your photography is actually my favourite these days. It reminds me so much of Erro's work, and he was the best :)

"and he was the best :)" A perfect place for "IMO"...
I've seen a lot of Erro's work and was NOT very impressed with it.

Really? "...and he was the best" isn't obviously an opinion?

NO! It certainly isn't "obvious"! If she(?) had said "I think he was the best", THAT would be "obviously an opinion" As stated, it was presented as fact... And my response was fueled by my deep disappointment in much of Erro's work. You're a real hero but barking up the wrong tree!!

Art appreciation is subjective. Therefore any feedback, comment, etc. given, is an opinion.

Exactly, bibblefuss... hayley stressed throughout her comment that she was giving her opinion. "I love..." "My criticism..." "I would have loved..." ~ plus, she backs up her opinions, with examples of what she would have preferred. I didn't find her comment at all lacking of indication that she was merely giving her opinion.

It's a good thing that all of us don't blow things WAY out of proportion... ;o)

Thank you bibblefuss and fer_realz :)

You bet, Hayley, I'm always happy to see your comments because while you are not prolific, it is always obvious you put a great deal of thought into them. ( :

Access The Full Set Of 138 Images By Joining MetArt Today!