English

This gallery contains 131 images @ 21 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Comments

What a face and well everything else,she is very lovely looking young woman and those eyes!

Marta is gorgeous. i love her blue eyes, her large boobs, her wonderful ass and shaved pussy. she is great and wish to see her back soon.

She's right up there - I wish I was!

The voyeur in me would like to see more of her. She has her panties off, that's great, but the set is pretty tame as mentioned earlier.

I find it endlessly fascinating that of the four sets today (Wednesday), the set with the highest rating (Cathleen) has the fewest comments...by far! and the lowest rated set (this one) has roughly three times the comments that any of the other sets have. Can there be a logical explanation for this...? I doubt it!! lol

One explanation: Doug, and the conversation his comments inspires. ( :

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

That's right -- I'm an instigator of critical thinking :-)

"Instigator" certainly --

Beyond that, I would re-examine the statement.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Well, just take a look at the relative rating of this set... :-)))

Actually I don't blame me for that rating, tho no doubt some will :-)))

LOL
I don't think you're responsible for the rating! ( :

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

I hope not! :-)

Sry its Salma C new gallery I want

Hey met art I want to request Salma A new galleries can u make some

So much wasted space...so much talk...so much "global warming"...and sooooo totally useless.

I guess Neanderthals simply are not capable of more complicated forms of entertaining themselves.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

To say nothing of Homo sapiens :-)

Those amazing breasts....

Marta is one of Matiss's voluptuous women that I love. Another is Violla, who we get to see tomorrow.

It is nice to have an indoor set once in awhile. I enjoy Marta's sparkling blue eyes and great figure. She has a lot going for her, yet I think the teasing should end and Marta give us some open leg poses, even just once. I'm sure I'm not the only one so curious.

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

There are so many beautiful Ukrainian models with large breasts and Matiss seems to know where they all live.

I always felt that Sofi had the best breasts on this site, but I must say that if Marta hasn't stolen the crown she can certainly share it. Absolutely gorgeous, voluptuous beauty. More please

I agree, it's a toss-up between the two. I appreciate both of them.

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

May I suggest, check out the one and only gallery of the Ukrainian model named Salma C. published in 2012 by Matiss. She has an amazing 40 inch bustline and her breasts are huge.

A Neil:

Thank you Neil. When it comes to breasts, nothing beats natural breasts, and when the lady has huge natural breasts as does Salma; both she and we are blessed.

Ummm I think I'LL pass...;o) I'm with the old "...mouthful..." group. lol "Them things is dangerous..."

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Yes Rock I'm with you there. Not that Marta is bad-looking to me, but I prefer small, sleek, youthful, "athletic" breasts :-)
I'm told they're supposed to be more sensitive :-)

I know other guys feel the exact opposite. That's fine. Less competition for my fave! :-))

I prefer "athletic builds", and that does not include much body fat. I like a handful but not much more.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Well now I know one reason you like Kristel, even unshaven :-)

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

Actually, my two favorite models are slender and have very small breasts.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Right.
To me it's a matter of harmony, proportion.
I'm not saying Marta's out of proportion!
Actually I haven't looked at her that closely.
But she does seem to have an appealing face :-)

Oh, yes! Thank you Neil. I had almost forgot about Salma.

You are a wealth of information. I move that we elect you as the chapter historian!

Marta E is as perfect as they get. 10+. Excellent photography and set. Next time photographer, avoid the crooked shots like photo 0001.

Love the clean shave. Don't change anything. It's Marta E and girls like her that keep me renewing my subscription to METART.

Marta is phenomenal, an amazing beauty, she looks fantastic here once again, those awesome boobs are an absolute sensation. It's great to see her indoors and while I would love to see a lot more explicit poses where she exhibits her lovely shaven cunt, this set remains a delight.

One day, maybe, those creamy thighs might be opened just enough to reveal the feminine treasures hidden between. Until then I will still enjoy Marta. patiently.

I'll take two please, one Simone B and one Semmi A.

  • Kees
  • 4 months ago:

Nice dress, nice bra and nice titties!

Marta ls totally beautiful,from head to foot.The tips of her ears are totally beet red which is a good thing,it means she's getting off on this as this is involuntary in girls. Try shot 74 its the best view. I gave Marta a 10++++ and a 10++ to Matiss,he could have changed poses a little more,and there is not enough rear views

dog, I think it is probably Marta who is holding back. Matiss has no problem with Violla showing all, front and back (even a bit inside). We'll see tomorrow.

♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪ Heaven must be missing an angel •*¨*•.♪♫♫♪

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Marta you're a nice-looking lady and you ought to consider letting your pubic hair grow out -- it would balance nicely with the rest of you :-)

Don't be afraid -- it's natural! :-)

And if the guys here really love you, they still will.

Some will love you even more :-)

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

Hi Doug, It has been twelve hours since this set was published. 186 members have rated this set. Only eight members agree with you and gave you a thumbs up. That's only 4.3%. Maybe all the members who share your opinion viewed and rated this set before you wrote your comment. Yes, that could happen. :) btw: I am one of the 8.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Do we actually know how many people agree with us, or at least are not against the idea?
For me, 8 thumbs up is great. That may be the tip of the iceberg.
As Steve Jobs said, how do people know what they want if they haven't seen it yet? :-)
I say let's experiment. Take a chance on bein' natural. I know it's a radical if not frightening concept to many people here, but they may discover it really ain't so bad. That it really won't wreck Marta's appeal. That it might even enhance it.
Same could be true with other models.

As I've been saying, I would like to have both. I luv comparing my favorite model shaven and unshaven -- I'm not sure there's anything sexier than doing so.
Think of it as yin-yang :-)

Neil, let's not get caught up in percentages and numbers. They are the excuse the industry uses to not change or diversify. The numbers are suspicious to me anyway -- they are drawn from self-selected groups.
I would rather trust or follow nature... :-)

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

15 hours after publication. 8 thumbs up, 196 members rated the set. 8 out of 196. A dismal 4.08 percent. Maybe Marta's grooming choice is correct. I am sure there are thousands of members who agree with you but did not rate the set, did not post a comment and did not give you a thumbs up. The silent majority. :)))

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

See how easy it is to be misled? According to the time stamp, I made my initial comment 7 hours ago. Not 15.*

Is that how we decide what is right or wrong -- by looking at MA's published numbers?

They often do not coincide with what I think is right (or wrong.)

I've seen a large number of what I consider lousy sets rated in the high 8s and low 9s -- while sets I think are excellent are rated "much" lower.

I see many models who "far" outrank my fave, and I'd swear the people voting are blind or otherwise defective :-)

So I don't put too much stock in those numbers. They are meant to preserve the status quo -- or at least seem to function that way.

Correct me if I'm wrong. No one has succeeded in convincing me yet. And I think that's because what I'm proposing has not been tried.

Correct me if I'm wrong. Good luck! :-)


*I think you also have to take into account the nature of my comment, which is somewhat radical. That it thus far seems to get more positive than negative response is possibly significant :-)

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

Well, well Doug 21 hours since this gallery was published. 238 members rated the set, meaning at least that many viewed the set. And only 8 members gave you a thumbs up. Only 3.3% of the members seem to agree with your position. And even less than that even care enough to reply to your comments.

You know there are websites that are dedicated to hairly all natural models.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

You put a lot of faith in those numbers Neil.
Not to curse anything, but what do you make of my comment getting at this moment more thumbs than Frankie's response to it?
I guess we should discount that, huh?
Shaved shaved and more shaved.
A shaved paradise!
How boring :-)

Wouldn't you like to see a little diversity? A bit of an alternative?
Some -- oh my god -- hair!?
I think you would :-)

You just don't know it yet :-)

You're like a bunch of little kids who freak at the sight of "hair" sprouting on their bodies.

OMG!

You'll learn to luv it -- or at least accept it :-)

What choice do you have?

MA airbrushing! :-)))))

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

Consider this Doug. In Loreen's recent gallery, 251 members rated the set. Viking posted a comment simply stating that he liked Loreen's hair. He got 21 thumbs up. 21 out of 251. 8.3 %. You wrote much more and got only one or two thumbs up. 1 out of 251. 0.003%. Just a thought. :)))

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

So I guess that means I shouldn't say what I think?

I'm not saying stuff to be popular, but to be truthful.

Yes I'm trying to change things. Resistance to that should not be surprising.

I'm thus the opposite of a conservative. Though I'm all for the conservation of pubic hair :-)

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

Could it be that Viking's kind of comment is more effective?

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Don't know Neil. I'm just bein' myself. Maybe there's room for both of us?
We need all the help we can get :-)

BTW, did you notice my more moderate* tone on this page :-?


*relatively :-)))

NO! Absolutely not. NO PUBIC HAIR. Leave perfection alone, man.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

She already has it, obviously. We're asking her to let it be natural.
For a change.
Because it is beautiful, sexy, and would "perfect" her.
That is why it is there in the first place.

Why anybody can't see or has such a problem with this is hard for me to fathom. Why someone would have such a problem with a natural feature -- as natural as her breasts, legs, hair on her head. Why she would I guess be considered unacceptable, repellant, even, if she let nature be.

I don't know, I sure wonder, and I sure don't agree. And I'm sorry that so many other people, including models themselves, seem to think this. Because they are wrong.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Key word to that post: "Absolutely"...

Do I detect a bit of close-mindedness :-?

Not to mention "NO", "not", "NO"... :-)

As in "negative" :-)

And then he tells me to "leave perfection alone."

Frankie, shouldn't it be up to Marta?


I know I put some pressure on models to be "natural", so I'm a fine one to talk, but... :-)

I think being able to see Marta both ways would be very interesting :-)

She would be just as perfect at least with a bush :-)

Doug, you are absolutely right, it should be up to Marta. K, Rylsky and others have already said that they do not pressure models to shave. On the other hand, I don't think that they should be pressured NOT to.

Women shave for many different reasons, mostly because it is the trend in society right now. The trend will probably change, as trends always do. It won't be because you or I wrote some comments on an erotic nudes website. It may happen in 5 or 10 years, who knows. I do agree that it might be interesting to see her with a bush - just once! But again, that's entirely up to Marta, or any other woman here who blesses us with their beauty.

I completely agree with everything you stated Kilroy.
_______________________________________________________

It should be the models choice (and we have been told by many reliable sources that in fact is their choice), but Doug just cannot accept this fact.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

BS PD!

Of course it's their choice to be a sheep! :-)

You're a worse generalizer than I am!

Man, that stupidity bug is ragin'!

Too late to avoid it?

I guess :-(

I'm hoppin' the next plane to Ukraine to make sure they do what I say! :-)

Jeezuz! You guys are turnin' me into a swearer! :-)

Doug you keep stating you are speaking the truth.
Many sources on this site have stated that the models are the ones who have made the choice to shave/wax. This is a FACT

What you state is not fact, but YOUR OPINION.
Everything you state is YOUR OPINION.

You do not have one shred of evidence proving that woman are being pressured into shaving/waxing.

It is actually plain and simple, you are stubborn and refuse to accept that your preference/taste is not popular today.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

PD, let me walk you through this.
I am not stating that I am speaking "the truth."
Except as I see it.
I am seeking "the truth", and trying to be truthful in what I say -- I am trying to be honest.
I am thinking about what is behind a model's choice to shave.
When I see that 99% of them do so, the first thing I think of is the instinct to conform among a bunch of young women working in an industry I view as defined by conformity.
The individuality of these girls is in most cases not fully developed, and they are simply trying to make a buck, so to speak :-)
So the way I see it, most, almost all of them simply decide to take the path of least resistance and conform to what they see almost all their peers doing.
They don't need or want to take further chances.
I am not denying that this is their choice. I'm trying to get at what is behind it.

You are correct -- this is merely my opinion. Did I ever deny that?

Did I ever deny that my preference is not one that currently prevails here?

As I've said before, be careful what you accuse another of -- you're likely pointing a finger right at yourself.

You say you are trying to get at what is behind it, correct?
Then why don't you email each photographer with a survey to give to their models asking each of them why they shave/wax?

That might sound ridiculous to you, but how else are you going to find out?

You sure as hell aren't going to find out by commenting each and every day about how you want more hair, hair, hair, hair, hair, HAIR, HAIR, HAIR, HAIR!!!

Why do most men shave their beard?
Why do most women wear makeup?
Why do women wear certain hairstyles, clothes, shoes, etc.?

Because of trends and personal tastes.

BTW, the only thing I've accused you of is being stubborn.


  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

And btw demonstrate your own stubbornness! :-)

Just try to keep in mind what I said about the nature of this industry as I see it, and the work the girls do, and their typical age.

I have spoken with Rylsky about this -- he's the one who gave me the colorful term "shavesaurus" to describe the grooming habits of his models. I took it to mean this "shavesaurus" controls them and not the other way around :-)

I've also talked briefly with Arkisi, Deltagamma, and Catherine about it. Nothing they said has debunked my theory -- rather the opposite.

You don't catch a whiff of sheepish conformity here? Maybe it's just easy for me to see since I don't like 99% shaved. In any case the reason for it may remain a mystery as K suggested the other day.

But you might want to consider why what I say upsets you so. Could it be you're tryin' real hard to deny a painful truth?

If that's the case you may be better off skipping over what I say, since I don't plan on censoring myself and this issue is part of why I'm here.

I know it's not an issue for most of you, pleased as punch as you are with the MA status quo. You don't want diversity. I'm the issue :-)
So don't read what I say! You'll be happier! :-)

Doug explain how I am stubborn? How am I being stubborn? What am I stubborn about?
____________________________

Get this straight....it is not what you say.

It's that you are complaining to the wrong people. You continue to bitch about hair on a forum that has no control over the matter.

Deny, what painful truth (here you go with knowing the "truth" again)??? You must be a Prophet:-)
.....and your sheepish conformity B.S....IT IS A TREND DOUG.
A trend just like any other.
People make choices every day in life based upon what others have done or what they think others might want.
Every woman chooses her clothes to fit her lifestyle and/or her social group. They often choose a hairstyle to match that of a celebrity or someone they admire.
Shaving/waxing is a trend (just like tattoos have become).

Why do you have such a hard time accepting that no matter what you want, women are going to do what they want to do.
They are not going to change because Doug wants them to.
If you think otherwise you are delusional.

BTW, one of the photographers you mentioned has no credibility.
This person spouts nothing but lies and if you (and anyone else) have been paying attention to another photographer, you would reach the same conclusion.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Well, you're certainly hangin' in here stubbornly :-)

I make my arguments here because everybody then has a chance to see them, including the powers-that-be, the photogs, the models -- anybody with a net connection can read MA Comments!

So to me it's a great way to get my message out. Much to your chagrin! :-)

Why do people follow trends, follow the crowd, follow fashion? I would submit it's for the same reason these gals shave off their bushes -- which is kind of a strange thing if you think about it.
They wanna be cool, they wanna be with it, they wanna be like everybody who is cool, with it, etc :-)
In some cases they may wanna be part of something bigger than themselves.
They also want protection from appearing to be different :-)

Yes a person is going to do what she wants to do.
Do you know what that is?
Can you predict the future?
Do we even know what we're gonna wanna do tomorrow, next week, next month, next year?
We'll just have to wait and see, won't we?

In the meantime I'm sowin' some idea-seeds :-)


Don't know about the internecine photog conflict. Doubt somebody's bad character would have much influenced what I picked up about models' shaving.

Incidentally, though I would generally like to see more freedom of expression in the body hair department, there are only a few models to whom -- via comments -- I have specifically suggested grow their bushes.
Marta was one yesterday.
They should take it as a compliment that I'm interested :-)
I think some may... :-))))

Doug, I do not have a problem your comments in any way, in fact I would be the first one to complain if anyone's comments were censored.

It's obvious you will never be convinced you are preaching to the wrong crowd.
No matter how many members have said it, you will never believe your crusade to change a current trend will end in failure.

I applaud your tenacity, but question why you don't join a site that caters to your tastes/preferences?
It could be that you are a member of Met Art because it offers you a podium in the form of this comment section/forum.

If so, then this is where I have been most guilty of giving you an audience to preach to.
So, I can really only do one thing....and that is to refrain from giving you an audience.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

What would be the sense in me preaching to the converted :-?
Actually there are people here who agree with what I am preaching. Quite a few, it seems :-)
I got in here to keep current with one model -- that's why I'm still here. But as I've noted many times, I've found other interesting and unimaginable situations along the way.
Shaven pussy is a trend as you say -- and by definition trends change.
But why do they change?
In part I think because of "pressure" people put on them, out of boredom, the desire for something different. Also entropy. A new rage then fills the void.*
I'm hoping to hurry the inevitable process.
That's my folly -- whaz yours :-?
Well as you said, giving me another chance to respond! To hone my argument. Thanx! :)))

Best of luck to you dude. It really has been interesting.


*I think there are also states free of rages and trends. "Classics", you might say. That's really where I see "natural" pubic hair fitting in.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

And btw PD -- would you believe "sheepish conforming to a trend" :-?

I'm not gonna pretty it up, because I don't like it when everybody does it all the time :-)

The girl I love here has not. That's one reason I love her.

Though she has of late been following that trend, I have hope she'll have the courage to be different again.

Because she showed that spirit before.

I'd like to see other girls show similar moxie.

Because unshaven is intrinsically no worse than shaven.

In fact it's better.

But we won't go down that path now :-)


Be daring girls. Stand out. Key word: distinguish (yourself from the crowd.)
If you dare :-)

Too much to ask of these lambs -- I mean young women :-?


Back to one at a time :-)

One last comment Doug.
I do appreciate your "thick skin", it's good that you can take it as well as you dish it out. Not everyone can do this.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

If I have a thick skin here it's because in a way I know what I'm talking about -- I've been thinking about much of this stuff for a lifetime :-)
Also this is the net -- there's plenty of time to gather and keep one's composure in the comfort and privacy of one's home :-)
Better than real life! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

And thank god you adore shaven. You'd be in a real fix if not :-)

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Pretty much agree, but I believe things in society change because of pressure to change -- people want change and make that desire clearly known.
I.e., in most cases "change" doesn't just happen by accident, though "accidents" can certainly contribute to it.

As it is now, I believe models are under pressure to shave. Mainly because of the trend you mention. This is a highly conservative industry, in my view, scared to death of "stepping out of line" (perhaps for good reason :-) and it is not going to do anything to tamper with prevailing trends -- they will merely follow whatever they perceive is prevailing at the time.
So "change" has to be put into the hearts and minds of models etc by people like you and me. A lot of us. Ideas change the world, and do not require sanction from "the powers that be", who in fact normally oppose it, at least at first. Think vested interests :-)

Just so we don't feel totally powerless, which is how some people here want us to feel.


Nice try folks trying to shut me up. Keep at it! :-))))

Do us a favor doug, pose the question on twitter and report the findings... If you're truly interested in "trends", you may learn something...we all may.

And we're not trying to shut you up, we are just tired of the same old song over and over. But you know this because others have told you the same thing. So ramble on if you must, but don't whine about the flack you take, because honestly I think you thrive on it...

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Somebody else'll have to do that because I don't have a Twitter account.

And Rock I'm gettin' tired of you whining about me (including any whining I may do :-)

I don't see it as whining, but simply pointing out discrepancies, hopefully edifyingly :-)

But that's OK. Say what you must. I think I'm gettin' through to you in some ways :-)))

In fact you seem to thrive on what I say :-)

You think all your whining puts "pressure on the models" doug??

That's "entertainment" right there...;o)

And then you ask frankie "shouldn't it be up to marta?"

I'm guessing that you think it should be up to YOU!... ;o)

This is much better than what's on TV...LOL

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Hey I'm glad you're entertained! :-)

But Rock how do you know how our comments make models feel?

BTW, did you read all that comment, or just part of it?

Every action causes a reaction, at least in most places :-)))

Every action causes a reaction, true to laws of physics with the addition of the word "equal", maybe not so much for society. You might have a significantly greater reaction if you rented some billboards in Russia and Ukraine. I could just see them now:


ATTENTION MET-ART MODELS - DOUG WANTS YOU TO NOT SHAVE





Sorry Doug, just had to have a little fun with you on that one. Do they have billboards in Russia?

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

We are physical and part of physics :-)


Hey, we don't need no billboard when we got the net! :-)

Better to elude the authorities with too :-)


Yeah, my guess is that they gotta lotta billboards over there, plastered with propaganda.

Probably almost as bad as here! :-))))

ВНИМАНИЕ Met-Art МОДЕЛИ - ДАГ хочет, чтобы вы не брить




(Already translated for you)

I don't boast of knowing how the comments make the models feel doug...

"I know I put some pressure on models to be "natural", so I'm a fine one to talk, but... :-)"...

Who was it that said that doug?? Oh wait....that was you...

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

That's why I wanted you to read the whole comment :-)


How's anybody gonna know what we want if we don't tell 'em?

Whether they hear or not is another question.

Should we tell 'em louder :-? :-))))

You think they present themselves for us to pick and choose how they should look!!?? You think that if we harp on them about how they groom, that they won't go somewhere else where they are appreciated for "who they are"!?...not how some gorilla thinks they SHOULD look. You used to make a little more sense doug... You're loosing your grip while hanging from a hair...;o)

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Well, what are comments for?
Why do some of them read them?
Why do some grow hair?

Just because I tell them I'd like them to grow theirs doesn't mean I don't appreciate them.

Maybe it means I care :-)

How do we know?


Guess I'm just experimental by nature. Not so dead certain of some things.
And read my words carefully before jumping on them again :-)

  • Gary
  • 4 months ago:

Marta's face and breasts are awesome, and her body is perfect. Unfortunately this set does not highlight her breasts nearly enough - in too many shots they are not displayed at all - as if the model, or photographer, or both, are hesitant or embarrassed to do so.

Photo #110 might be the greatest picture I've ever seen in my life.

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

Yes photo number 110 is a magnificent photo of a beautiful young woman. If her breasts were concealed, this photo could be the image of an international advertising campaign for perfume or cosmetics. Matiss captured lightning in a crystal bottle.

It is an extremely nice picture!

Personally, I never touch tea. But I'd make a pot for Marta. ( :

I always delight in Marta's sets, her amazing curves are a feast for the senses. And those eyes! They're hypnotic! What is thy bidding, mistress?

Mmmmmmm curvy... just like a woman should be. ( :

when is this honey gonna do a video?!?!?!

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

Marta has been endowed with an amazingly perfect feminine body. What an awesome figure. And those beautiful blue eyes. Exquisite!

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

There are some models that seem so sweet and innocent. As the set ended, I felt like wrapping her is a robe, giving her a big hug and a kiss and showering her with encouragement and praise. Marta is shy and does not present her intimate parts, but she is so very special.

LOVE the shots of her laughing. ( :

Stunning Woman, tame set

Marta doesn't do daring... more's the pity.
Oh well, she's still amazing, very nice to look at.

Yo, "fer" --

Two phrases come to mind:

"If you've got it -- flaunt it !"

"Use it or lose it !"


Access The Full Set Of 131 Images By Joining MetArt Today!
CLICK for FREE ACCESS