This gallery contains 123 images @ 21 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


a great set for a gorgeous model and top quality photographer.

no photographer on earth can capture beauty the way Katya does.

Katya you are great great great. i adore you sweet and gorgeous Russian lady

"Sleek" is one of the first adjectives that enters my mind when I view Monika's sets...sleek like a jaguar. Subsequent adjectives would be sensual, hard-body, erotic, strong, lithe, and most of all...desirable. And those eyes...wow. Thanks, Catherine...this is a perfect example why I gave you a "10" rating.

Great set!!! I loved photos 44 and 45, especially 44 and that little mischevious look Monika has!!! A great photo!!!

Hi luv_lickn_clit) I specifically opened this frame that you have indicated. I am very critical of to their work, but this frame is I liked the most. Thank you))

great work girls loved the colors

Hi baseball 1958) I agree with you. That's exactly what I like in this set)

I love you Catherine! Some photosets are better enjoyed with the comments hidden, but hopefully you'll see this, since I must express my thoughts on this. I loved the vibrant red hammock with the green meadow in the back. This is one my favorites of yours in terms of color. I can't think of another set on Metart with hammocks; I wonder how many nude women you could fit on one. Monika has a fantastic body and an unforgettable face, (she reminds me of Drew Barrymore). Once again, I love the complementary colors. Vincent Van Gogh would have loved this set too!

Hi Ouchstopit) I agree with you, Vincent Van Gogh would have liked the combination of colors)) I myself have long wanted to gather a frame contrasting colors. Monica has a nice feminine features, but at the time of shooting her to have to spend a lot of effort. This can be seen in the set. Thank you for such a lush and colorful commentary)) I was pleased to read it.

Monika looks as lovely as ever. #42 and #44 are my top 2 favorites with #99 barely beating out all the rest for 3rd.

Thanks Catherine, keep up the good work. No need to reply, by now you have to be fed-up with all the "BS" correspondence that has already taken place today.

Hi C6C791 ) If you do not say anything about the model, this set I really like the color. I am very pleased that you are so appreciated my work. I have now had the time, so I was able to communicate with users. Thank you very much)

You don't seem to be very happy, Doug.

The reason why most nude models shave is so that we can see what's underneath. If most customers preferred models not to be shaved, you can bet that that is what sites like this would give us.

Indeed, Met-Art is slowly getting the message that most of us would prefer more explicit shots. If you look at what Met served up in 2005, you can see that they have come a long way, though some of us feel that they have further still to go. Quite a lot further. Catherine herself has demonstrated that close-up shots can still be things of beauty.

But Catherine does need reminding, it seems, that more close-ups are required!

I think you are partially right, glazar, but I've said this before, right now shaving or some degree of grooming is what young women do these days, at least in the US. Most do it because they WANT to. It is the current culture, pubic hair is seen as unclean by the younger generation. There are countless surveys that confirm this. It is certainly welcomed by the porn industry, but they don't have to promote it. Society does that for them. Ask any of these photogs here how many models come to them already shorn before the shoot begins. It is their personal preference more often than it is Catherine's or Met-Arts. I know what Catherine's preferences are on the pubic hair issue, but I don't think she has to ask her models to shave very often.

As for close ups, Catherine has been including more of these over the last six months, I've noticed. Many of us have told her to throw us a bone and I think she has listened. #89 in this set qualifies to me as a close up. I don't know how far out in advance these sets are shot before they are posted, but I have seen Catherine's style evolve noticeably for the better since the comments feature was added.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Can you direct me to one of those surveys, kilroy?
Plus, "some degree of grooming" can mean something quite different from shaving or waxing all, or almost all, of it off.
Anyway, I'd like to see this site be more reflective of what I suspect is at least a sizeable minority preference among males -- and which I think many young women are in the dark about.
Basically, they're just gonna do what they're told. Spin a different story, they'll do something else.

After all, head hair is "dirty" too, but I don't see too many of them waxing it off :-)

BTW, I don't know if or when you're going to get this. They'd been blocking me off and on all Thursday. Apparently there's a limit to how many posts you can make in a 24-hour period.
Especially, I might add, if they're unpopular :-)
The last blockage began right after K's comment to me, however many hours ago.

Many thanks glazar) Me was interesting to read your comment. I will surely consider your wishes.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I'm not convinced that that's the real reason models shave.
Close-ups? That's not my problem with Catherine's stuff.
Check the term "static" for more of what I mean.
It could also be that she's a woman shooting women, and perhaps this has something to do with why her images are generally not erotic to me. It's like they're lacking a heterosexual eye.

You have very interesting version concerning a lack of heterosexuality. But you aren't right.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I don't even know for sure that you're a woman. And I guess a woman can shoot very erotic images of a woman. I'm just guessing about why your images are missing something for me.
BTW, I've only seen a few of your sets. Point me to one you think I should look at.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

BTW, just so you know, I was blocked from being able to make the above response for almost 2 hours.

Doug, If you do not like it all, go to the websites of other photographers. I do not need you to answer. What you write, bordered by the boorishness. You write is not constructive, I realized that you do not like my work. Take care of yourself. I hope that you will ever change your mind.

I think Catherine does a great job with the girls. When I first started I was surprised by her work. I too thought that maybe there would be a conflict between what a woman thinks men like and reality but she changed my mind quite quickly.

Monika is very reserved in her posing so I can understand your feelings but this is not Catherine's influence.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I'm not sure that "reserved" is the word for what I see :-)

Maybe Catherine can straighten me out :-)


I think "reserved" is the best applicable term for Monika. We have many models, especially when they are newer, that grow more natural in front of the camera over time. I have many that actually started out with no open legs at all, that grew to be top models. We also have top models that as they got a bit older, became more reserved in their posing. This is all due to models comfort level that we are very respectful of.

I would hope our members would all agree that respect is required for all of our contributors (models and photographers) that grace our pages for your viewing enjoyment. If you do not like something that day, we offer 3 other sets for you to move on to.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Well, she straightened me out, and wasn't reserved about it. She seems a little insecure. Why?

It's OK, Catherine. I'll have a look at your other stuff sometime. And I won't say anything if not in praise :-)

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

BTW, glazar, I couldn't be happier with some of the stuff I see on this site :-)

Doug, If you do not like it all, go to the websites of other photographers. I do not need you to answer. What you write, bordered by the boorishness. You write is not constructive, I realized that you do not like my work. Take care of yourself. I hope that you will ever change your mind.

Doug, If you do not like it all, go to the websites of other photographers. I do not need you to answer. What you write, bordered by the boorishness. You write is not constructive, I realized that you do not like my work. Take care of yourself. I hope that you will ever change your mind.

  • Gary
  • 11 months ago:

Marvelous work Catherine! Monika is gorgeous and perfectly displayed here.

Many thanks Gary) I very much wanted to make a bright and contrast set. It seems to me at me it turned out.

I love MetArt & don't have too many complaints. But one is the frequent use of the same shot being used for multiple pics, just at different zoom levels. And when it's used for THREE pics like numbers 61-63 I feel ripped off or that I'm an unobservant moron.

Hi SouthernMaster) I very much understand you and you are absolutely right. To me it is most too very much it isn't pleasant. I will consider this remark in further work. At me such occurs when during selection any shot is pleasant and automatically you save the following shots which the little differ from it. I try that such repetitions didn't happen. Thanks)

But Catherine, isn't the important thing about similar shots the fact that there might be subtle differences to look for? I wouldn't automatically throw out the similar shots, if I were you.

"ripped off"? How? It's not like we're guaranteed a certain number of images per set. If it makes you feel better, you can just pretend that you're looking at a gallery with "only" 120 images.

As someone who loves headshots, I'll take the additional close-ups like #63 anytime.

Hi bibblefuss) I will try to minimize similar repetitions. I will agree that it isn't absolutely correct.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I think this set shows why still lifes contain fruit, not an apparently living woman.

I do not quite understand what you mean.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

What I mean is that your model seems to be playing the part of an inanimate still life element. There is a shot in there where she almost comes to life, but...
A real live woman doesn't belong in a still life -- at least not in 123 repetitive shots.

Catherine, I think that my favorite color contrast is either:
red/green, or orange/green.
In fact, my next tattoo is going to be orange/green.
So I enjoyed that aspect of this shoot very much. ( :
I'm trying to remember the last time I saw an artist get two shoots in MA in the same day. Congratulations, Catherine! ( :

Thanks fer_realz) I am very glad that you liked my plan with contrast colors) I not so like tattoos) But if you intend to make it, I hope, it will be beautiful) it would be interesting to see at a tattoo)

You'll probably think it cliche, but it is going to be a yin-yang circle, bright orange and green instead of black and white. ( :
Don't worry, it's not going to be huge! But it will compliment the peace sign I already have. ( :

I think this tattoo will be good and you will decorate)

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Catherine: the master of static.
Her facial expression never changes!
BTW, why are bushes always shaven?

  • Neil
  • 11 months ago:


All this does not sound like you? You always write such positive comments. There is no need to be so negative. It is not becoming of you. MetArt will have over 70 new photosets this month alone. It is unrealistic to expect all of it will please you. Catherine is MetArt's number one photogragher. She is the highest rated photographer.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Neil, thanks for the opinion, but don't you know I'm something of a roving critic, sampling new-to-me work and on occasion being moved to pan something? This is the first time it's caused a mini-meltdown, though, that I'm aware of :-)

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

And it certainly is unrealistic to expect all will please me! Just ask some of my "victims" :-)

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Well, Neil, as you may know, I don't put too much stock in those ratings. There are 2 ratings for photographers, which may be better than just 1.
Did you see my reply to you last night? If you think I'm negative here... :-)

It's tough to receive criticism, and I really got under Catherine's skin. More than I imagined. But I think she ought to consider why she is so offended.

Sometimes the truth stings. Ooops, now I said it!

Catherine, I wish you well. I hope you do make pics I like!

Thank you Neil) I think that this user is not adequate.

Doug, you're the truth. In my work, the model does not behave the same way. The models are different. There is a smiling model and not very playful model. When the model smiles, it is not always pretty.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Yeah, but you're the one snapping the shot, Catherine. You can't put it all on the model, unless she's dead :-)

Catherine: the master of simple beauty.
Better the plain expression than a childish smile that creeps me out.
More men prefer clean shaven over hairy.

Hi kanobione) you accurately noted. I myself like the calm beauty. Though of course if I meet a bright playful model, I give her a chance to show themselves. Thank you for your kind words.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

More men prefer clean shaven? That is highly debatable, if not very doubtful.
This site does not represent the world at large.

I agree with you. I have already written, that does not feel very confident when the model is not fully epilate.

Catherine:Master of boredom.
Better an erotic and attractive smile tan a stony bust.
Are the majority preferences the only ones to be fulfilled?
All members pay the fees,even if they belong to a minority.

The seller

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Apparently the "minority" opinion is to be dismissed here :-)
We want uniformity and conformity!
No exceptions :-)

You always have a choice. I do not understand why the "master of boredom," is you have so many emotions.

There are sites that specialize in natural bushes on women, I assume the bush-lovers are members of them. Maybe they are on this site because of how uniquely beautiful these women are, shaved or unshaved. But the fact remains that the majority of men prefer shaved, and the majority of hot girls do shave. As I've said before, I have gone from distain to really liking shaved, so I understand both preferences. The ONE exception I make to liking shaved is with redheads. Orange (it's not really red) fuzz is rare enough that it's a shame to shave it. Right, like my opinion is going to matter, but like Doug (fur lover) I'm compelled to state my case.

Not forgetting the model, Monika is fabulous from head to toe. I prefer more close-ups and more explicit than Catherine is willing to shoot, but that being said, a very nice photo shoot of a lovely sexy woman.

Hi RedPilot) Thanks a lot. I am guilty) Close ups a little) When I removed, I liked an overall picture: sky, model, hammock. I very much liked color of the set. I will try to improve and do close ups.

Hey Red, I agree on the redheads. Have you noticed though that most of them seen to be less hairy anyway? Maybe it's just an allusion since there is less contrast between light and dark. :-)

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Debatable "fact", Red. But how do we know for sure? Hire Gallup :-?

Very simple, Do you think for one moment that if the majority wasn't for shaved all of these sites and mags to would feature shaved versus "natural"? It is a known fact that they cater to the majority.

If you want hair go to

You will find all you can handle.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Well, we'll just have to see. Things evolve. In the meantime, I've got all the hairy I can handle on this hard drive :-)
I have to say, the best hairy it contains resides on this site :-)

  • Neil
  • 11 months ago:

Wow! Two sets from Catherine on one day. What a treat. And it is the very beautiful Monika a fresco. I like Monika's short hair style. It is a refreshing difference. Very pleasing photos, Catherine. Your outdoor sets have a very nice air about them. Summer in the area around Kazan must have been wonderful. Great work. Regards and best wishes to you and Monika.

Hi Neil) Thanks a lot) the Summer in Kazan was roast. It was necessary to have a large supply of drinking water. Still very strongly insects disturbed. Before shooting of models it was necessary to process very plentifully repellents. I very much liked work in the open air)

Yeah!Two Cath´s in one day ,a pain in the neck.

The seller

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Yeah, not all of us go for her style :-)

Hello gswkJu, Doug. Two of you in one day too much for me) You can communicate with each other and write through time)

Ha ha! Great response, Catherine!
( :
I think we will now call you
"The Tigress."
( :

I am not a tigress)))

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

Sorry, Catherine!

Catherine, you angel! Two beautiful women in one day! We are blessed. Monika is lovely, as usual, in her dignified way, and that wonderful face radiates a quiet intelligence, which may be the sexiest trait of all.

Hi Sailor) Thanks a lot) When went shooting of this set, it was necessary to Monica not easily. She tested an easy indisposition and I had to care besides shooting about its health. It is very pleasant to see and read your comment)

Excellent set. A beautiful woman, wonderful colors which complement to model and please the eye, perfect lighting, crisp clear well focused photos and a nice balance of closeups and wide angle. What more could you ask for?

Monika is a lovely perfectly balanced woman who exudes confidence and charm. Each and every part complements the whole and leaves you breathless. She has a sensual presence and the ability to impress without seeming to try to. The only desire let unfilled was my hope that she spread those lovely labia.

An easy 10+ for me.

Hi hipshot131) Thanks for warm words. I wanted to make soft, but thus a bright and contrast set. Monika's face corresponds to my plan. In this set there are shots which are pleasant also to me too. Thanks)

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

I will not answer your question, hipshot :-)

No need considering we all know anyway. :)


Access The Full Set Of 123 Images By Joining MetArt Today!