This gallery contains 120 images @ 14 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Very sexy woman. Thanks Rylsky. Do these guys who bitch shave their crotch and pits? Wonder what they look like. All the women on this site are beautiful.

Why did Met Art wait so long to bring Nedda back for another set?

  • Neil
  • 3 months ago:

Nedda is one of Rylsky's models on RylskyArt. She recently had a great video on RA which was received well by the members. So Rylsky offered this gallery to K for MetArt. Nedda has several great sets and that video on RA.

lovely little beauty! The low marks for hair is just mean.

Unkempt hairy pussy and armpits constitute a major turn off. The flat chest and overgrown hair did not help either. This model needs a major make-over.

fully agree, and her bio says shaved????

@ kkronful:

These aren't the images you're looking for. . .move along, move along.

the Kenobier

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Don't believe everything you read :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

You need a major makeover, Frankie :-)

Astute observation....;o)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Some people are loud and clear :-)

the counselor :-)

Shaved would be better!


  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

With all due respect, shaved would *not* be better :-)

easy! click on her name, you'll see what you missed here.

Rylsky, if you click her name you her bio. it says shaved!!!
at least trimming would be better. underarm hair is extremely ugly.

well, your English is much better vs. mine. I 've read this set's cover was marked as "unshaven". Ask yourself why are you here?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

He's here to say he doesn't like unshaven. Evidently he doesn't think we know that :-)
More than that, he fears there may be more unshaven coming to this site.
I would say he has good reason to be alarmed! :-)))

Nobody from photographers have possibility to change any bio on MA, sir. I said her page contains full portfolio of sets and she was presented shaved.
if you want direct link - get it:


  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

In the meantime, he is *extreeemly* disappointed! :-)))

Cute girl, nice body but as someone else put it so eloquently - Naaaaahh.

Funny how many pics with her arms raised. I guess if you're gonna play to the fetish you may as well go all the way.

8.04. Nicely done, gentlemen.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Talk about trolling with that fetish comment! :-)))

You have a perfect right to :-)

But please let's use that term correctly :-?*

No way, right :-??

*which would mean using it seldom if ever here...

And those scores tell everything to some people, right :-?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

BTW, it looks like the small-minded are showin' up to lower this set's hallowed rating. They bet their lives on that number. I hope MA doesn't :-))

the skeptic :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Gotta run, but god willing I'll be back! :-)

So keep your powder dry! :-))

the revolutionary :-))

R U watching "Turn," Doug?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

No, but maybe I should be! :-))

the Giants fan :-)

Your Giants are playing real well. I've always been a Giant fan myself (I've never been to San Francisco, but I hope to one day).

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Another Giants fan from afar. They're out there! :-)

For some reason they are easy to make a connection with. Must be their history. Then becoming winners of late doesn't hurt either.

They've been scary-good this year. Even with the injuries, people keep stepping up to the plate and delivering (notably with 2 out :-)

They are motivated. We will see if they can keep it up :-)

SF, and NorCal generally -- a colorful place. Lots to see. Plan a trip :-))


Even though he played well before my time, I'm a big Willie Mays fan (seeing as I was a Center Fielder myself I really admired his defensive skills).
It's a little ironic, but one of my brothers had a baseball coach who was a nephew of Vic Wertz.
I would like to see Northern California....I'd love to drive up through the Central Valley and see Mt. Shasta some day.

On another note, I saw an article the other day where some people are once again calling for Northern California to separate from Southern California.....what do you make of this?

If I was to live in CA it would definitely be in the northern part.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

San Diego's kinda nice.

You drive east from there and go over the mountains and instead of landing in the irrigated but fertile San Joaquin Valley find yourself in the Colorado Desert...

Varry inta-resting! :-)))

☼ the day-tripper ☀ :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

As a kid Willie Mays used to make my day :-)
But it iz a small world :-)

Yeah, you can go all kinda directions from the strange Central Valley. Up, east, west, down (in more ways than one :-))

I haven't seen the recent flare-up on the North/South split -- last I heard they need our water, among other things, too much :-)

It's quite a difference once you get south of the Tehachapis.

It's like are they or are they not gonna drain Hetch Hetchy :-)

Thaz what we need -- an alternative Yosemite Valley! :-))

One of these days I'll need to get out there. Everything I've seen and read about the Central Valley and Northern California makes me want to see it in person.
I've read a few articles that claim it's one of the nicest places in the USA. I love mountains much more than the ocean, so I can only imagine how much I would enjoy the Valley views.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I used to take the ocean for granted -- not so now :-)

What is cool is when you get a mountain/sea combo, -- a lot of that in NorCal :-)

Very true, I saw that in Croatia with the Dalmatian Alps and the Adriatic Sea:)) The only difference is that N. California is a luscious green and Croatia is dry and rocky.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

As you go south from the redwood north it gets browner beginning in April/May -- till the rain returns in Oct/Nov.

Lotta N CA is dry and rocky of course inland...


the tourist :-)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

2 -- pretty sexy :-)
4 -- if you like girls with sex hair... :-)
7 -- yep, ladies have it too. Tuff luck, guys! :-)))
11 -- quite appealing :-)
13 -- would make a nice comparison with shaven :-)
14 -- see? :-))) Funniest pic of the year :-)))
15 -- don't worry guys -- she shaves her legs! :-)
18 -- if Mommy doesn't shave her pits... :-)))
21 -- make no mistake -- she's a pretty good-lookin' lady. Part of it is her self-confidence :-)
25 -- good DR! (dynamic range that is :-)
29 -- very feminine :-)
30 -- lovely shot! Shows her inner beauty :-)
32 -- luminous brown eyes :-)
33 -- appreciate the lack of photoshopping! :-)))
34-36 -- very cute! :-) 39 -- charming! :-)
40 -- wooooh! :-)) 43 -- a la Cignus in spring :-)))
44 -- as it should be (more or less :-)))
45 -- the cutest of a lot of cute shots :-?
46 -- very hot :-) 47 -- Nedda's knockin' 'em out :-)
49, 50 -- primal :-) 51 -- relaxed & confident -- a savvy woman :-) But no airbrushing please! Leave her legs alone!
54 -- womanly :-) 55 -- airbrushed leg...too bad. Let's keep it real!
Thaz what a pussy's supposed to look like, btw :-) Even if it is a bit trimmed... 56 -- ditto...
64 -- playful :-) 65 -- !!! 66-- nice smile :-)))
72 -- elemental :-)
76, 77 -- there's an integrity about Nedda...
86 -- cute teeth! :-) 89 -- appreciate retained detail :-)
90 -- sexy :-) 96 -- kinda graceful... 104 -- nice portrait.
105-08 -- sensual :-) 109 -- exciting :-)
111 -- nice, very nice -- shaven boobs 'n all :-)
117 -- view camera time! :-)
118 etc -- (can't go wrong with the) hand-pussy juxtaposition :-)

Main prob with this set -- can cause too much wankin' :-)))

This set can cause "too much" of other things besides "wanking"...
"If ya know what I mean!"...;o)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I hope that "too much" doesn't displease ya too much :-)

If not, you made a mistake showin' up! :-)))

O.K. Doug, other than not being "you know who", is this set everything you could possibly ask for???

Nedda's cute, petite, and pretty close to "au naturel".
I think "K", Rylsky, and Nedda all did a great job in bringing this set to the group of MA members you are such a vocal advocate for.

I foresee MA remaining a site that publishes sets similar to this occasionally (and it will remain this way until the younger generation's preferences change....that is IF they ever change).
But, I won't worry too much about this set's (or any similar set's) rating.....I feel "K" does a great job in her attempts to please a wide spectrum of the MA Audience. I believe she'll see to it that this practice continues.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

No, this set is not everything I could possibly ask for. But it's certainly better than nothing :-)

You know that younger gen just keeps gettin' younger and I'm not so sure it doesn't like natural.

Likewise, there are plenty of old guys here who insist on shaven.

So I don't look at it at all as a generational thing. It's much more personal predilection. It's just that if you have a site that is overwhelmingly denuded, it's little wonder that's what your subscribers want. That does not mean you couldn't bring in a wider audience by presenting what it would like to see.
This is the argument for diversity.

So we have a "hairy" set here and I immediately see the old guard apologizing for it, saying don't worry guys, there won't be too much. That's because the old guard doesn't really like "natural". It wouldn't be the old guard here if it did :-)

So there's work to be done. No resting on laurels aloud :-))

MA certainly doesn't yet merit it, in my o-so-humble view :-)

That isn't to say K and the rest aren't making good faith attempts to bring in more diversity. It's tuff in an industry as conservative, conformist and unimaginative as this.

You gotta keep trying to be better than that :-)
So hold off on patting yourself on the back for now :-)))

the shepherd :-)

Why can't we all just accept that none of us will like every model (for whatever reason) and be thankful and appreciate the beautiful models who fit our type and taste.....and just leave it at that?

Whether a model is natural, shaven, or waxed bald....in the grand scheme of life it really is a pretty small issue to worry about.

IMO, a beautiful woman will always be beautiful no matter how she grooms, the setting she's photographed in, the style she wears her hair, etc.

I know hair/natural is a pretty big deal to you....but does this really change whether the girl looks good or not?
Just a thought Doug:)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Can't quite agree with ya there, because to me body hair is too significant a part of an adult person, in particular a nubile female.

I don't know why exactly it has become customary to remove that significant feature, to reduce it to rubble so to speak, and to vilify it when it is not, but to me as I've said before it suggests something deeper is amiss with the psyches of those who demand its removal.

Yes, I *luuvs* Kristel both ways, I *luuuvs* to compare her both ways, but the point is she presents herself both ways -- one of the reasons she hooked me is because she was unshaven.

I'd like to see that in all the women here -- both ways -- not just shaved. And because you see almost nothing but shaved, and they're evidently not free to let themselves be natural -- to me that sez something is wrong.

So it's more than simply being denuded or not. It's why.

To answer your last question -- it depends on whether she is Kristel or not :-)

As an example, Nikia: 'fraid to say no she doesn't look quite good to me in her always-shaven state. She knows I think her pubic area looks infantile.

It's an important part of a woman, especially to a man. That's why I can't overlook it.

I make the same complaint to many other models. I want them to be fully and proudly womanly.

And removing that hair in particular is to me an absurd task that ought to be dropped asap.

On occasion shaved is OK. Default -- no way :-) And yes I think shaven takes away from the looks of a woman, because she is deprived of a major feature.*

Just to answer your question :-)

*Consider: "heavy" hair growth occurs on only four areas of a normal woman. And two of those four are puberty-related. They are the two that we see almost always denuded here. Ask yourself why, and you'll get some idea of why I am against it and suspect something more than aesthetics is at work. Namely, oppression of women.

Doug, I don't give the subject a whole lot of thought.
Where I live women have shaved their underarms as long as I've been alive.
When I was a kid many of the older women wore dresses without sleeves (especially in the spring and summer) and they all shaved their underarms.
I never saw a woman's underarm unshaven until I was 18 years old and spend time in Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina. I'll add that I didn't find this attractive at all (and also that the younger local women did shave their underarms....even the ones I worked with who were refugees in a camp).

So, underarm hair is something that has never been a part of the culture I grew up around. Not one of the women I've dated has ever allowed their underarm hair to grow (not that it should matter, but I'm in my late 30's).

Pubic hair is a different story. The women I dated that I knew well enough to be sure of, did allow their pubic hair to grow (but they trimmed it so they could wear certain types of clothing).
I do not have any problem with pubic hair (au naturel, shaven, waxed, trimmed, or bald are all fine with me).
The bottom line is if I feel the women is beautiful...I don't give a damn what she's wearing, whether the shoot is inside or out, what hair style she chose, or whether she's natural or shaved.....it just doesn't matter that much to me.

It's only a photo....it's not going to effect my day. It's not a "real" problem in life.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

We're all different.
I won't bore ya right now with why I like their underarm hair (shaven or not :-) except to say it to me represents grown-up-ness and fertility. I always thought it was like a sneak-peek at their pubic hair. The armpit also emits erotic smells and they say pheromones, which the hair suggests and assists with.
It's usually shaven everywhere except in "niche" communities, some of which I have frequented :-))))

Pubic hair -- always the quintessentially hot feature to me.

BTW, now you know why I've gone ballistic when "technicians" here and elsewhere "photoshop" this hair, as if people have no use for it, don't want to see it, hate it anyway.
Some no doubt may, but not me :-))
And I have *always* been this way -- at least since I was about 8 :-))
So it's not a choice. It's inside us like it or not.

Yep just a photo. An image. Yet here you are payin' for it, and writing reams on this photography site.
Good thing it's not gonna affect your day, or your real life! :-))))

the reasonable :-)))

Good post Doug!
I know you are passionate about your "cause". I don't doubt this at all.
I tend to agree with you that it might be part of who you/we are, no different than why others feel passionate about the opposite though too.

That's probably why you are facing so much opposition.
"It" doesn't affect my life, I don't care one way or the other. I'm writing "reams" because I enjoy discussing different topics with the members of this site.
I've commented on many different sets, with several different people, about quite a few different topics.
Yes, these are just images....I've downloaded and saved very, very, few images and sets off this site (or any other). I look at an image and move on to the next one.
I hope you understand I am not judging you in any way. I have no right to do this and won't.
I just wish you would accept that you are more than likely only going to see a few sets like this one on MA for a long time to come.
I'm not saying I'm even for it, because I don't mind pubic hair at all, but the "waxed/shaven look" is going to be around for a while.

I'm just trying to be a realist about it.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I have a feeling a lot of people are like you, not really caring one way or another about the hair. That's another reason they're here on MA, et al -- they don't care it's almost always removed :-)
There are some obviously who detest it and have a fit when it is grown out.
Those are the ones I really have to wonder about! :-)))
It's like, golly, you hate nature that much :-?
Life is tuff! :-)))

You know what Browning, have you ever heard the idea that it's the journey that counts, not the destination?

That's kinda how I see what I'm doing here. It's an interesting challenge. And if I sense I'm helping make any progress in what I would like to see, especially compared to what I have seen, I'm
a happy warrior/traveler :-))

I think we are seeing more hair, and less photoshopping, so maybe what I've been up to isn't all for naught.

So nope my friend, I don't plan on shuttin' up! :-)))

Life's tuff. Doesn't mean we just quit! :-)))))

the pilgrim ☞ ♡ :-))

It's an impossible job to try and please everybody here, but K sure puts in a great effort to do so.

It's an impossible job to try and please everybody here, but K sure puts in a great effort to do so.

Damn gremlins! Worth saying twice, I suppose.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I'm sure K thanks you twice :-))

Nedda you're a sweetheart. Love you, love the bush, your "cat's" got my tongue...mmmmm
Would liked to see more of a variety of posed highlighting Nedda's sweet butt. (too many the same like 80-99) Other than that, great photos especially the "wet" look at the end, truly mouth watering!

I knew I was going to give this set a 10 before I opened it. Just seeing the preview picture I knew what I was going to get.

I love Nedda'a beautiful face and bush. Her body, as a whole, is perfect too. Beautiful breasts. I love the way her bush grows a little down the inside of her thighs. And the way her labia shows through it.

  • Gary
  • 3 months ago:

I agree completely with Neil. In addition, this set is superior because her body hair is well displayed, prominently and erotically, and not hidden by shadows, jewelry, hair and clothing as is so often true of set with natural models. And the poses beautiful and the setting is pleasing.

Just can't stay away from the water can ya... Just as well in this case.

it was +30C in shadow and I think it was + 35C and more on the sunny side.
water was needed refresher :)

Ok fine... For this reason, good!

Nedda bush? Oh yeah, baby!

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Desperately! :-)

Based on her poses, I am guessing that Nedda is a dancer and/or gymnast. She looks gorgeous and I love the hair, even the underarm hair. As I've said elsewhere, it looks soft and silky and would be an enhancement to the sexual attraction, not a detraction.

Naaaahh --

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Very eloquent of u.

Thanx for stoppin' by! :-)))

Ever noticed how that rhymes with the sound sheep make :-?

the observer :-)

It also rhymes with another sound you're familiar with, Doug --

BLAH -- !!


  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

C'mon, Dread, remember the good old hippie days. Nedda even shaves her legs!
Whaddaya want! :-))

The Head ☮ :-)

I really envy you that palette of emoticons, Doug! I love symbols of all kinds but I'm really jealous of your peace symbol and your ankh. ( :

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I have a bunch more but haven't gotten them to work here.

Could be there are more that will work on a newer OS than this.

Yep, but a pic is worth a thousand words, or whatever.. :-))

the symbol ☸ :-)

Love the detail without the excessive blurring and filtering. Beautiful set of a beautiful natural girl!!!!

Cute smile, lovely face and great legs. Lots of potential but get rid of the dead rats under arms!

You keep playing the "dead rats" tune. Don't you know any others?

At least any others that are less insulting to the young lady?

Hear, hear!

These young ladies deserve our praise for being willing to expose themselves to us (even for pay). Insulting them is the height of vulgarity.

At least any others that are less insulting to the young lady?

No need to know, we try to win our psycho-traumas with multiple repeating it in public, hoping it will heal our nightmares.

Hey, hey, hey - no need to question the psychological health of customers. Remember who's paying your bills.

Sure. But when you pay for access to see the Lady posing for you - I hope you never think you also pay for talk to Lady anything like this way.

Or, IOW, if you work for some Boss (who paid your bills) do you REALLY also let him say that your wife is a .... ?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Right, no sense in that indeed! :-)))

That said, you need your head examined! :-)

the shrink :-)

It's really very special way of masochism - to see the cover FAIRLY marked "unshaven"(IOW - "you'll see woman's body hair") but anyway click on set and see "dead rats".
I bet you never enter stadium and scream "why this is not Airport?"

Don't be TOO sure of that bet!! ;o)

Nedda is much more than a woman who has chosen to retain her bountiful pubic hair!

She is also attractive; with significant eyebrows, a delightful ribcage, nice nipples, great labia, long wavy hair, and superb butt cheeks.

My special appreciation to Rylsky for the many stretching poses that allow me to appreciate Nedda's ribcage ~ and the use of water to cause Nedda's nipples to stand to attention; and to K for including this gallery that is bound to please some of the members.

In spite of the repetitions a tasty, stimulant & nice set.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

First real quick look:

Nedda, you're a real cute nature-girl! :-)

It's certainly not all grown out (Browning :-), but I'm not complaining :-)

Like the wet too :-)

You look like you're having fun!

Well, you should. You're free! :-))))

I'll go through the whole set later :-)

Mr Natural ✌ :-))

Admit it, you wrote this before ever seeing the set. :)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

No, what I say is true there.

I am currently going through the set pic-by-hi-rez-pic.

And liking what I see! :-)

Until I've got my "review" up I'm avoiding other "reviews."

Responding to what they say instead of the pics themselves :-)))

Later! :-)

Great way to start the week with a wonderful set of this athletic young beauty, just a nature intended

Nedda is quite stunning and the bush & anal growth a total turn on ...nice one Ryl

  • ergo
  • 3 months ago:

What a bush,wow !! :-) . xx

  • Neil
  • 3 months ago:

Nedda, Mr Rylsky's beautiful wild child has returned to MetArt after two years. And she is proudly wearing all of her lovely hair, all of it precisely where Mother Nature put it. Nedda is so very cute, with her slender, delicate figure. Very nice. I love this little doll.

'Mother Nature' also put hair on her legs and in her pits. You want that shaggy, too?

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Lemme cut in to say, Yep -- you bet. Under the arms especially. An area you might have noticed is unshaven here.

Some people appreciate normal signs of human adult sexuality. At least accept them without a problem. You might think it's 'cause they're grownups :-))

Sorry to bang on ya -- you were just asking a (typical) question... :-)

'Mother Nature' also put hair on her legs and in her pits. You want that shaggy, too?

  • Neil
  • 3 months ago:

If that was Nedda's personal perception of beauty for her, I would have no problem with it at all. Of course, Rylsky did not give us close ups of Nedda's legs. Maybe she did not shave her legs. What about her forearms, should she shave them. Remember, at about $100.00 per year for membership, this particular set cost you about 7 cents. Certainly not worth getting up set over.

$100.00 per year for membership, this particular set cost you about 7 cents
Sorry, Neil, please don't forget millions of images/and 1000s of movs in database of MA (1999-2013). Nedda's set costs nothing in this ocean.

One of reasons of Nedda's return to MA was super-positive feedback and great stats of videos/photos of Nedda on RylskyArt.com as unshaven. So we must say thanks to RA members who bring Nedda back to please MA members to see her so successful and unshaven:)

sure she will be on RA again and again.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

You are doing God's work, Rylsky! :-)

The Saviour :-)

Are you drunk today?

Seriously, I hate to see this kind of comments. Especially with anything religious. Please don't do it.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Am I drunk today?

Not yet! :))))

Except for being maybe made drunk with reverence for what you and Nedda present :-)

Hey now really, aren't we all "God's" work?

Or whatever you want to attribute us to?

And the "saviour" is one who reminds us of that :-)

So when we see Nedda letting herself be more "natural" than is usual here, and some people throw rocks at her for doing so, that's what motivates the "religious" talk.

Otherwise, don't take me too seriously :-) It's all in the mind of the reader :-)

the sage :-))))

Ohhhhh please!!!! Is THIS your motivation doug?? "GOD'S WORK"!!

I can't wait till next Friday!!! ;o)

the sentinel

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

I'm lookin' forward to it too :-)

The pugilist :-)

She is gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous.

Yes, she IS. I'm glad to hear her run at RA is not over, I look forward to her material in the future. ( :

Me too....if she ever shaves again.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Are u here just to complain :-?

And btw even Nedda should show ya shaving isn't necessary to see things just fine :-)

the doc ☤

on RA you'll see 3 varieties with Nedda: trimmed, unshaven, full bush

I think "unshaven" and "full bush" count as one... And "trimmed" is two... But whaddu I know...;o)

I think "unshaven" and "full bush"
ok, my clarifying:
- "unshaven" = bikini area
- "full bush" = underarms included too.

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

Not much! :-)))

What I DO know doug, is that you've turned the comments section into your personal "One ring circus"... And I've had quite enough of the clowns... It's all yours!! ;o)

  • Doug
  • 3 months ago:

My personal play-pen! :-)))

Well, it's all for the ♥ of u-know-who :-)))

Now, if we could just persuade her to return... :-))

the romantic :-)

WAOUW..! Love at first sight... Her bush is perfect...! The direction of the hair, gives shape to the true holy chapel of intimacy...! What a woman...!

Here we call it "screams of Spring Cats"

Access The Full Set Of 120 Images By Joining MetArt Today!