This gallery contains 120 images @ 14 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


It's always a treat when a beautiful girl puts on a summer dress but leaves her panties at home and then spreads her legs to pose for some lovely up skirt pictures. Superb photography.

Great job!! Oretha looks so sweet, hot, and edible! Would love to see a lot more, thanks.

Model and photographer a winning pair.
A set very simple (see clothing, see setting), but suffused with a subtle sophisticated eroticism.
Oretha the next door girl met by chance she forgot her panties at home.

...she could always give them to me, for safekeeping, you know... :D

The panties are not suited to the beautiful girls.

American says "When you wish upon a star, someday your princess will come". Watching a movie titled "Szerepet" on RA, I wished upon Mars to have that stills shown. Today my wish came true across 190 days.
Thanks Rylsky,it's owed to you.
-Tokyo Sukimono-

Worn out no pink left in that pussy.

Looks good to me -- blue n' all!

The only way I'd cover that cute little thing with fur is a sable coat to keep out the Russian winter!

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

All bare like that she'll definitely need it! :-)))

This is a really nice collaboration between lovely Oretha and Team Rylsky.

Oretha has many superb physical features. I wonder if "Oretha has superb butt cheeks" will generate any response(s)?

It'll def generate much agreement, Baggy!

Beautiful girl. Very nice set, but the color seems a bit off...

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Rather bluish, as if needing a warming filter?

Yep....too blue is what I thought too...

Looks as helpful comment, thank you. Shadows in the open air with only reflected sky light + neutral reflections as gray wood here works for make model eyes comfortable and shadows are soft... but bluish color temperatures. Yes, sometimes I like it but I see members opinion here and I will took attention in future...

Here was something similar:
http://members.met-art.com/members/model/astrud-a/gallery/20121024/HARRERA/ - the part on a balcony in shadows

...but I liked it.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Yeah, I went through and liked that set...
Think Astrud's warm coloring might have offset that some?
Wasn't there a lot of brown wood in there too?
Oh, and maybe you used a warming filter :-? :-)

It didn't bother me all that much... It was simply noticeable. I can make adjustment with my software where necessary. Thanks for explanation...;o)

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Don't you remember the old "skylight" filter exhortations from the old days?
Protect your pricy lens as well!

They made billions! :-)))

That said, they are kinda nice on a cooler lens, better than nothing in open shade :-)

I think I know and remember all photo filters, one of my friends was named as collector of all the filters around the World, we made some lections together for my and his students in 2000's.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

You can put 'em on with Photoshop now :-)

Just won't protect your expensive lens! :-)))

to see with your eyes is to understand your points. it's really helpful, even when I not agree. that's what comments feature was made for. to know that somebody hate me - useless. why? because I knew it.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

That's right -- or just to confirm your suspicions :-))

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

And it makes the shaven skin etc look worse :-(

Can't/won't argue with THAT! lol

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

A little blue fur never hurt anybody :-)))

You sure about that??

A Doug:

I agree; even the Smurfs don't really hurt Gargamel and Azrael, do they?

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Call it an "open shade" blue :-)))

Oretha makes a compelling case for interplanetary space travel.

I could stare into those gorgeous eyes all day. Though occasionally I'd ask her if I could also stare at her butt for a little while.


Complete agreement from this Oretha admirer.

I don't like such photosets reducing the models only on their vag. More pictures with focus on her face or her breasts or her whole body , please. Because she has a wonderful face and a really sexy body...

Ideally, to me, I like to see a mix of poses. I do also like the full body shots, especially standing straight to show a womanly figure. I do like to see a few shots closer in on brests or vulva, but not the majority of the set.

I think this set had a decent mix of poses, I am pleased with it.

I love this kind of set, one where we see the girl with the wonderful face exposing herself quite explicitly, the key being that it's not just the explicit reveal but it's visibly the girl with the wonderful face and a really sexy body, displaying her most intimate charms. For example in the first 40 images in this set Oretha's beautiful, gorgeous face is only missing from one image, for me that gives the eroticism in the fantasy that this stunning girl is exposing herself for me, as opposed to close ups which look like they come from an anatomy class, although I can understand some may see these as a fantasy of approaching cunnilingus with the model, the beauty as ever is in the eye of the beholder.

I also like it when the sets present the model outside of what I would call the traditional striptease (tops then bottoms) format.

Percentage wise, there are few pics here that DON'T show her "whole body"...

I think that's what I was trying to say, but a lot more concisely.....

...but I love to see you like this kind of photos, it's really makes us happier when we see comments about figures and faces and "I don't like such photosets reducing the models only on their vag".


Agreed, but we see members stats and we see what sets was downloaded (as example, mostly extremely explicit and many closeups). We all love classic music and opera channels when we answer on the street to TV journalists, but highest ratings are porn channels when we are alone with our remote controller and TV.

"Nobody watched as many porn as any web browser"

I love portraits, I love classic nudes, but who cares and will you pay to watch this?

@ Rylsky:

I would not subscribe to a portrait only site, I might subscribe to a classic nude site; I am not offended when a top quality adult site includes many portraits and many classic nudes.

Yes, I am happy when it's accepted by viewers and photoeditor: portraits, nudes, explicit part. It's very good when artistic part is possible inside "regular explicit content".

Soon we will try to present something about it on RA: updates of different sides of this story.

thank you, Baggy

It reminds me of the Buddhist story about the blind men and the elephant. One man feels the elephant's trunk and thinks it's a snake; another feels its legs and thinks it's a tree, and so on.

The same with portraits, classical nudes, and explicit nudes. They're just three viewpoints, and no finite set of viewpoints is ever going to capture a subject. If an artist sticks to just one aspect, it can be revealing, but it can also come off as false. It's a bit limited to represent someone only classically, or just as a sexual being. It would be terrible to actually have to be either person, as opposed to the messy mixture of things people actually are; you'd never get to scratch your neck. Nobody is just one thing.

But bump a few such perspectives into each other, and you get something more satisfying. Being in love, for example, you feel a lot things that don't seem to hold together. You feel protective towards someone and idealize her; you also see her as a sexual object. That isn't a polite thing, and if it were, there'd be no spark in it. And you, too, want to be cared for and seen as a subject and also to be objectified, with the right kind of balance. They're all facets of the same diamond, and it opens your eyes to realize it.

Which is something I enjoy in your work -- different styles adding up to something larger than its parts, sometimes in the same set, sometimes between sets. It sounds as if you have interesting plans for RA.

@ Rylsky:

This is likely to be another reason why I really like the RylskyArt experience and enjoy my membership!

YW, Baggy, let's create something together. You know, some updates and series was created because (of) RylskyArt's members ideas was interesting. See our blog in May (and new series - after that, in June). It will be announce of new series on RA.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Well as you said in ratings we trust!

Or should I say downloads :-?

Definitely the "pornier" a set the higher the rating, normally.

So I guess we know where things are headed!

Now, if only more close-ups were hairy! :-))))

Good points you make. I was not aware that MetArt tracks downloads. This can be misleading, since I never download anymore, no matter how much I love the pics. It just doesn't make sense to store porn on your hard drive. But I will sometimes rate a single picture, do they look at those?

Oretha is lovely, thanks to all for bringing her body into my world. When you shoot in shade, color temerature goes way blue, I know some abhor Photoshop, but here's a good example of when to use color adjustments.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

It just doesn't make sense to store porn on your hard drive?*

Not I guess if you're a lifetime member of this and all sites that have pics you want to look at.

Better hope your i-connection stays up too! :-)))

Oh, one other thing. What if you wanna look at a pic in an image viewer, or Photoshop?

Maybe even mess with it?

Lemme know if I'm missin' something :-) (sorry! :-)))

*maybe you're afraid of the authorities comin' to get ya :-?

Oh, I think RedPilot's right. One reason it doesn't make sense to store porn on your hard drive?
'cos it takes up so much damn space.
Personally, I found it a wise investment to buy some external hard drives for the porn that I do download. That way my laptops' hard drives are still mostly open for necessary stuff vs. "recreational" stuff.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

But the point is you have it on a local drive somewhere.
Otherwise you would be completely dependent on the cloud.

In my case I like fast access to image files I've decided to save. I can open them in Preview or Photoshop and really check 'em out.

I've got several external hard drives just waiting to be more employed :-)

Let's just not invite the cops in for an inspection! :-)))

I think in any commercial project like MA the main is visitors count and subscribes. It is only my opinion, nothing as "official MA press-conference".
My examples was mainly about what we saying in public and what we doing home alone. Huge difference, you know.
If we talk about people's interests, let's see any photo community (free, not paysites). Any site have "landscapes", "Portraits" and "Nudes". votes for "Best photo of the day(month, year)" are mostly for anything but the nude... but look on "VIEWS" stats!!! Any poor homemade ass photo get 10+ times more traffic. That's what I said.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Well, sex sells! :-)))

Speaking of public pronouncements v. actual practices, MA is a helluvan example, but to be fair as you say, not an atypical one.

If they were really smart they'd capture more of the "natural" market.
Haven't found the way to yet, I guess :-)

"If they were really smart"?? Are you sure you don't mean "If they were really easy to influence"...???

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Both :-)

Actually I think they're more stubborn than me :))))

By "they" I mean the whole industry too including the girls.

You know yourself. You have preferences. You know photo equipment. You have idea. You said it is great idea. You've asked MA to be "SMART" and go make money.
So what it was? Nothing.

If you have idea and sure it is great idea - let's go create site and make money. Now you asking MA spend their money, change policy that made them 10 times more popular than ANY nude site in the WWW...

Even when I see that I can't understand MA's ideas and policy in choosing photographers, models, styles, locations - I must just say that they are right just because they are #1 with THEIR IDEAS.

everyone who has left them and said "MA is a shit, I am great" - see where their sites are.

Doug, go and prove your idea. It works for you (maybe for me as well), but we know nothing in this BIZ as BIZ, even if we are right and even if we are greatest of greatest in idea. What you asking for? Invest MA money to something that Doug love. But Doug is here, it's simple, they are right and doing things well if you pay to be here.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

They are good in some ways, but fail miserably in others.
And if they rest on their laurels and don't change, they will be overtaken by a competitor. That's the way it is particularly in American business.
They point to their stats and are apparently highly pleased with themselves -- meanwhile someone is figuring out how to reduce their market share.
Pride goeth before a fall.
Just take a look at the big Dow companies a few years, a few decades, a century ago.
Where are those dinosaurs/fly-by-night outfits now?
Swallowed up by the future! :-)
Somebody who took a chance.
One of the reasons big companies eventually go down is because they become too conservative.
Too protective of their bigness :-)
Which in a market tends to be temporary, if not a flat-out illusion.
Especially these days :-)

Just take a look at the big Dow companies a few years, a few decades, a century ago.
Where are those dinosaurs/fly-by-night outfits now?
Nothing lives forever. True. We talk here about present days only.
Or we can view as Chinese Wiseman's quote: "Let's look on things after 500 years, now it's too early to judge".
Well... I plan to live for 501 years. So far my plan works.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

So far so good. You must be doing something right! :-))

But that's right -- we want to strive for a "timeless" perspective :-)))

"Levi's 501" would help

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Absolutely timeless! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

A little more on that, Rylsky. Just imagine one of your always-shaven stars letting us see what she's been shaving off -- I mean would that not be cool?
I don't have to name names. Just go down the top-o'-the-pops :-)

That's what I'm pushing for. And I know there's a huuuuuge amount of resistance to it. A major failure of imagination, seems to me.
Positive imagination at least :-)

They wanna stay interesting for a long time?
Change it up.
Show us both, and in-between.
Get full use out of your endowment.
Unshaven is also beautiful :-)

Unshaven is also beautiful :-)
wanna see all of us in knockout?
add this quote to all you messages. Just imagine Doug's message:


Unshaven is also beautiful :-)


  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

I know it's a shock to hear that from me! :-)))

But really, it's something I want several of them in particular to take to heart, because I don't think they either know it or believe it.

I'm serious! :-)

They think natural is ugly. And they are wrong. They need to be re-grooved. Re-educated!

Good luck! :-))))

Just imagine one of your always-shaven stars letting us see what she's been shaving off -- I mean would that not be cool?
Please feel free and find other photogs who presented their models in shaved-trimmed-unshaven look to members here. I think you just write it to wrong address. I like variety and you know it.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Of course you would love it just like me. It's the girls who don't get it.

And nobody is forcing them to do anything. But the style of the day, fashion, the trend, etc, -- the "tonal of the times" -- is forcing them to shave.

Plus (the fear of) economics.

There are factors and forces beyond their photographers that are keeping them from being "natural."

They think they're free, but they're not. Otherwise, we'd see unshaven all over the place. We'd see variety, diversity.

We wouldn't see 99 or whatever % shaven/waxed etc.

I commend you as always for bringing us the diversity you do. But you can only do so much. At bottom it's up to the girls, as you say.

They need to be encouraged and shown how to be free :-)

Until then, they're enslaved by the Shave-a-saurus :-)

Those "dinosaur/fly-by-night outfits" (big DOW companies...)haven't gone anywhere. They simply changed their names "to protect the guilty". They're STILL raping and plundering our country! Tomorrow the WORLD!!

The other way around, actually, Rock... all the big "American" multinational corporations got big by raping the third world for pennies... now that they're done with that, they're treating US like a third world country.
You know how everyone says our exports are up nowadays? It's not finished goods, we IMPORT those. It's raw materials, much of it oil natural gas and other petrochemical products.
WE have become the biggest colony of all time, only it's not of another country, it's of our own damn corporations!

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Duchies & Fiefdoms Inc! :-)))

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

The usual suspects neither die nor fade away! :-((

  • GTOS
  • 4 months ago:

Excellent set here! Love the way it starts off and the progression thru it all. Especially Orethas' expressions! there so inviting. Beautiful Oretha hope to see you again soon.

Rylsky: much routine, insufficient Inspiration. It's a great pity because Oretha is a very lovely girl.

Roses are flowers , rain is wet, black is not white, Istanbul is not Constantinople.

Uber gorgeous Oretha strikes again...
The only thing that could have improved an already outstanding set would have been a pretty pair of panties under that pretty dress, that she would flash us glimpses of before stripping them and getting down to business. As it is, this is a great set.
Oretha seems to be opening up over time and getting more comfortable posing. I only hope there are many more sets like this in the pipeline...

corresponding video


The movie (even one piece demo) is visible only to subscribers of RA.

Great set of this beautiful, natural, sexy, girl next door

Oretha has a lovely face and smile, superb body including the most appealing derriere imaginable. More of this beauty soon please, preferably with a pair of full white panties under her summer dress...

Nice to know I'm not the only one to think this... ( :

  • Neil
  • 4 months ago:

120 excellent photos of the beautiful Ms Oretha Mars. Excellent. Very nice visit with a very pretty young lady.

Awesome set from Oretha and Rylsky, absolutely love the flimsy dress and no knickers exhibition, Oretha looks simply gorgeous, nice work.

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

Honey, about all I can say for now is
that is why you have pubic hair.
Pubic fur.
And why you shouldn't shave it off.
Not if you want to look your best in photos such as these.

Falling on deaf ears doug....;o)

  • Doug
  • 4 months ago:

I don't think that's for us to say.
Actions speak louder than words.
We shall see :-)

Access The Full Set Of 120 Images By Joining MetArt Today!