Look at 61 and 62. Angela can get the whole body in focus, when most can't or won't.
you have 3 bend over poses I love them I have been trying too get you to do that pose in all the sets
Beautiful, beautiful, as always, Rachel, cheerful and smiling, joking with the beholder.
Beautiful photos of Rachel who donate us his secrets of woman.
Location is not really pleasant.
The overcast sky spreads a gray light on all the photos
(attempting to correct in post-production).
It must be very unpleasant for Rachel pose barefoot on the stones.
I do not understand the aesthetic contribution of confused bush and stones.
Oh Rachel, the beautiful and gorgeous Rachel - thank you for making my night with this beautiful set. You are my favorite MET model and you were wonderful again in this set. So organic, so sexy, so beautiful. Thank you for sharing your glorious body with us
Sometimes its extremely difficult to phantom what the hell some of these photographers are thinking about. In the day of pedicures being among women's top priorities, the beauty of a woman's feet should be any photographer's major concern. Oh well, I guess some guys like dirty feet, something about lickability of the toes and dirt, I guess; to each his own, I can respect that. Rachel is beautiful, drop dead gorgeous, and natural; I've been a long time fan; though I think she should have stayed with Arkisi; its been down hill from there. I must admit Met Art's photography has significantly improved over the last few months; quantity versus quality debate, better scrutiny of submitted galleries, or its ongoing competition with its longtime rival and nemesis, the other M website, (not mentioning any specific names); but its always getting better, that's what makes them #1. Met Art will listen to its subscribers; IMPROVE THE PEDAL SHOTS, OKAY GUYS!!!!
hotte, remember neither the model nor the artist has any control over when their sets are published. I guarantee the sequence of postin has little relationship to the "when shot" dates. According to DeltaGamma, once he has a model scheduled he may shoot several different sets. He submits them and waits. Thus these shots may have been shot before she even met A. of G. or Palo. We have no way of knowing.
For Angela - Thank you . Wonderful set. GREAT work :-)
What a gorgeous woman!
There is something mysteriously magnetic about our beautiful morsel Rachel, and I don't get the feeling she's trying to play mysterious or coy at all...
Maybe it's her endearing smile, made the more endearing by a slight asymmetry in her facial features? She looks so innocent and yet open and giving and willing to do whatever it takes...
It certainly has something to do with those magnificent breasts, though they are also slightly asymmetrical, so Rachel is not classically beautiful, since to be classically beautiful, one must be without flaw.
So I don't know what it is about Rachel, I just know I'm drawn irresistibly by that vulnerable yet effervescent smile... and held by something more beyond...
Sorry about the duplication, I swear I hit the post button only once. Maybe I held it a split second too long...
IF Rachel's height and weight from her bio are TRUE, she certainly packs a lot of pizzazz into those 101 pounds. I really like her breasts and areolae; and butt. Of course her face and eyes are spectacular too. I don't know if cute or beautiful is how to describe her face, but something in this set makes me say cute. Kudos to both ladies.
Angela, Please come and join in these comments we would love to here ,ore about this set, You, and Rachel. You have shot her before how did this one go, in your opinion?
Hello Rachel of the wonderful breasts. Nice to see you again—and to be reminded that the rest of you is pretty wonderful too. This time, though, I'm knocked out most by your smile. It could light up a room. And I'd really like to know the angel in photos 119 & 120. Kisses all over.
Isn't she just such a tease... Really like this set.
More sets of model Rachel Blau on the Met Art Network: