This gallery contains 121 images @ 22 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


hayley13, I am sorry but I've only just seen your comment of 21 hours ago. I am almost squealing as I say this, you can't possibly cut out people like Sapphira and Kalena. You gotta think again!

While Sapphira does indeed possess a "1,000 Watt" smile, even so, it is nice to see other expressions on her gorgeous face, and Mr. Helios has done a wonderful job of capturing smiles and other expressions in this set.

Well hayley13 now you have four other sets and a film to go back and feast your eyes on all over again! Seriously though, how do you compliment this set too far? With that face and smile, those gorgeous breasts and pussy, and Luca Helios' photography, this must be one of the best sets I've ever seen. Well done and thank you Sapphira and Luca. More please.

Amazing model for sure. She is gorgeous from head to toe. I'm such a sucker for shots like 118 where you can see the vaginal entrance, I have to give this set a 10. But I'm not fixated on one thing, the rest of the set was great as well.

Хорошо, но мы хотим лучшей демонстрации пусси, можно же взять за крылушки пусси и немного преоткрыть врата рая, а мы получим истенное наслаждение и продлим подписку, надеюсь у вас получится.

It's Greek to me... Any idea?

  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

Google Translate from Russian:

Okay, but we want to better demonstrate Pussy, you can also take as little krylushki Pussy and preotkryt the gates of heaven, and we will get Easten pleasure and renew, I hope you succeed.

  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

I guess we need Rylsky's help :-)

This set is absolutely magnificent. Possibly the best set of 2013. And... If I'm being honest, i've never paid too much attention to Sapphira until now. That's how good this set is. What a gorgeous girl! Boy am I jealous.

When Adam featured Sapphira recently on the blog it was her film. In the comments on the film the existence of a significant scar on her lower left abdomen was visible. In today's set Luca has made it disappear again. Why? I totally agree with all of the positive comments here. Sapphira is one the most stunning models we have had come along for a long time. In the movie she shows that without any enhancement she still is unbelievable. Her reality does not need any photoshoping. Adam responded to my comment like this as follows "As for “the scar,” itself. I agree with you. I like it! It’s proof positive that Sapphira A is a flesh and blood human being." And my comment today is simply, Amen.

If a boo bird is going to give a down thumb, then tell me why. Hell I might even agree! I am honest in saying (I try always to say that!) that my posts are nothing other than my opinion. Even though my real name is Pope, I do not pretend to speak "ex cathera".

  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

Speak, and fear not the thumb chorus :-)

  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

Different strokes for different folks, obviously, different cups of tea. They've got a dilemma with that scar, don't they?
I think removing it here takes away from the set, and the credibility of MetArt.
BTW, does anybody know how many kinds or categories of numbers are taken into account when determining the ranking score?
My guess is that they don't use or factor in enough measures, and that's why the rankings are skewed in favor of, for example, newer models.

My other crusade is against "photoshpping". I prefer to see, as Adam says real flesh and blood human being.

  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

I do too. Especially when they think they're improving something by say "airbrushing" stubble.
You'd think we were looking at a 1959 Playboy, or a 70s Penthouse :-)
Come to think of it, we practically are!

The actual details are confidential however I have e-mailed the powers to be the start of my crusade for a Hall of Fame. I got a response almost immediately where from the site administrator. He explained part of it. And told me about why they changed. Supposedly better computer and database. They in the old system excluded votes from asshole that gave, if I remember correct 0 & 1 scores trying to pull down their "unfavs" and elevate their favs. The system is supposedly set up so that each member only gets one vote. They can change their mind and their vote but then it "replaces" their original. And as far a top models only the votes on their profile page count. No adjustment for the models "set" scores. Hopefully this helps you. Please comment in the future when you see my fully proposing a "Hall of Fame". Managment I think from their response likes the concept but they don't have any idea, nor do I, how it should work. And if their is really enough overall member interest to make it worth their while.

  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

First of all, I think they need quite a bit more data than I gather they are using to determine a model's "rank" -- I cringe at the term. Numbers that should be taken into account include total votes, inclusion on favorites lists, and sets, including set scores.
As it is now the rankings insult, annoy, or move to laughter members, models, and photographers alike. In this case, more is better -- more data, that is. Have 'em bring in a statistician or a pollster, along with a programmer worth his or her salt.
As I said before, Hall of Fame ought to honor women who no longer model, but whose images are still on the site as good as ever.
If they want to promote new models, let them have a new models section -- bright faces and bods that haven't yet stood the test of time.

swplf2, I say post on Candice's upcoming set, or Yani's if you think it will get more attention:

Hall of Fame
Yes = thumbs up
No = thumbs down
Please help my cause and place your vote.

I'm all for it. Perhaps it could work as follows.
Model must have 25-30 or more sets to her name. This rules in models like Altea, Iveta, Lily, Anna, Liza, even Caprice and Mila, and it rules out new girls coming through like Sapphira, Kalena, Jen and Grace (who despite being outrageously beautiful haven't yet 'earned their stripes' for a Hall of Fame placing). Whether or not a rating system is required after that, well... I don't think its necessary.

Just a couple of ideas.

Thanks. It is this type of input I need to formulate my proposal for the HOF. One thing I have decided is that once a Model is in the HOF, is that the HOF will be a separate tab, In the HOF it will list them either alphabetically or by the year they first appeared. Absolutely no ratings, if the are there they are all worthy without rank.

I assume that the current Top Ten get the most views so it will be under their sets that I will push the idea.

  • Doug
  • 11 months ago:

That's another thing -- how do they determine the "top ten"?
We already know that if they're just using the scale on a model's info page to determine her rating, it's way too simplistic and gives -- sorry to say Sapphira and Emily -- a skewed -- and false -- result. Or at the least a false impression. As a pollster might say, the sample size is too small, the criteria too vague. Just to give one quick example: why should a great MetArt star like Indiana, with 8200 votes and countless sets going back 5 years and still as good as ever (have you seen her latest set?) not even make the top 150 models page, while Chloe, with a thousand votes and one 10-month-old set to her name, comes in at #24?
Nothing against Chloe -- she's a good-looking girl and I want to check her out -- but if MetArt is what it claims to be, it needs to think about this and ask itself what the rating/ranking system is for. Why even have it?
IOW, it needs to be as good as the models and artists it claims to have, and respect them as much as possible. If it's going to rate and rank them, it had better be done with great care and consideration. Otherwise it undermines its own stated ideals. Apart from pissin' off a lot of people :-)
BTW, I'd be happy to just ignore the whole damned thing. But it's kinda hard to avoid when it's so prominently displayed.

Being a 15 year internet porn veteran, it's hard for me to even take notice of 90% of the stuff out there, let alone get excited about it. But this set completely blew me away. It's probably the best photo set I have ever seen, and God knows I have seen enough in my time. Big congratulations to Luca and Sapphira for creating something truly special and truly great. The setting, the lighting, the progression, the tone...everything is perfect. And Sapphira herself is like an angel, so, so achingly beautiful. Luca, you are a genius. Best. Photoshoot. EVER.

Sapphira is fantastic! She is a beauty beyond compare, and Mr Helios is the perfect photographer.

  • H WU
  • 12 months ago:

Sapphira makes this set beautiful with that amazing body.

BEAUTIFUL WOMAN! Great photography.

God what a magnificent woman! This set is so much different from her video but it just demonstrates how fantastic this woman is, I cannot see how any man could not be charmed by this wonder of creation. Seeing that body covered with oil is so hot! Her parents must have had fantastic genes to create such wonderful specimen of perfection. Everything about this beauty is taken to the max. She has raw sexual power that is amazing and a smile that makes me swoon. If this set doesn't light your fire there is simply no hope for you.


  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

To the max indeed :-)

  • Doug
  • 12 months ago:

Nice job of shaving, waxing and cloning everything interesting off of and out of this model.
There are disadvantages to being ranked #1, even if the ranking system is bogus.
The setting is dramatic, though.

Simply amazing! So incredibly beautiful.

Sapphira is sheer perfection. If Helen of Troy's face could launch a thousand ships, Sapphira's smile alone could launch twice as many. And who knows what sort of damage that fantastic body could cause. Even in this unfortunate outdoor setting she is breathtaking.

Access The Full Set Of 121 Images By Joining MetArt Today!