English

This gallery contains 128 images @ 14 megapixels. Sign up now to see them all!


Comments

Virginia Sun gets a 10+ from me for every one of her pic's even the one's showing only her absolutely gorgeous face

Virginia Sun gets a 10+ from me for every one of her pic's even the one's showing only her absolutely gorgeous face

Her innocent and sweet smile always melts me..

Pic #50, oh to eat her sweet pussy!

beautiful, sensuous & sexy ....an excellent set

looked at the thumb in the 'bio', thought 'meh... but it is a Rylsky set...

clicked on a couple of pics.

In love.

This girl is cute AND beautiful. Images 24/25 make me go 'sigh'. Such a sweet smile. Of my favorites she shares the top spot with Nikia.

Your hair, Smile and breasts are amazing! Your a 10 in my book

Rylski does read input from the blog so I presume he is watching here too. He also forwards some of it to his models. Using non technical terms I think most of his work is excellent and that he has a very good rapport with his models. Not to mention some of the finest models on metart. In tribute to this he now has his own site where you can see his best work and get better acquainted with the models without being limited by Metart's rules.

Like all artists he sometimes gets a bit too artistic for me and I am sure there are days when his model is not up to producing her best work. On the average I think he is one of the best artists here. He seldom ever fails to give me the type of content I am looking for.

Rylski does read input from the blog so I presume he is watching here too. He also forwards some of it to his models. Using non technical terms I think most of his work is excellent and that he has a very good rapport with his models. Not to mention some of the finest models on metart. In tribute to this he now has his own site where you can see his best work and get better acquainted with the models without being limited by Metart's rules.

Like all artists he sometimes gets a bit too artistic for me and I am sure there are days when his model is not up to producing her best work. On the average I think he is one of the best artists here. He seldom ever fails to give me the type of content I am looking for.

Now you know it because you became a member of RylskyArt.com
Be in contact with members is one of main ideas of his site. And we all glad that MetArt now start to do it same way.

Так, вона зробить членство набагато більш цікавим -- компліменти! :)

Рильський читает и комментирует ...! :)

Some of the models ARE reading these comments....so we don't want too tasteless comments on their genitals, breasts, demeanor and general appearance etc!

True.

Bastante joven dama! Un cabello hermoso! Yo necesidad a ver más de sus abierto, mojado putang! Putang! Putang- Get it!!!

Excellent photography. The model has a very beautiful face. More nudity and more backside shots would be greatly appreciated. Some of poses were not sexy.

Virginia, I love your hair.

Thank you for going through all the effort that your gorgeous hair must require.

Right on Birthday cake, any woman who has hair that long has to put a lot of effort into it. Thanks Virginia!!!

Virginia, I love your hair.

Thank you for going through all the effort that your gorgeous hair must require.

This girl is beautiful but this photographer just doesn't get it!! Yet another disappointment.

Although Rylsky is one of the best overall, he lacks the ability to direct the models in posing with clear presentation of what we are all here to see.

what do you want to see? her 'insides'? Maybe some gynocological exams? Maybe you should head over to ALS if you are into that kind of stuff.

Virginia is gorgeous. but this set is supposed to be nude set

Virginia is gorgeous and delicious!!! I luv her long hair!!!

Virginia is beautiful and Rylsky is one of the best photographers on Met, but why use a high rez camera then photoshop the photos to make them look as if they were shot on old grainy highspeed film? Ive seen several sets from other phogographers who have done the same thing. A waste of high res equipment imho

Large pixel size reducing noise amount is one of the features hallmarking many of Rylsky's sets --- cf Canon EOS-1D Mark II and Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III etc (microlenses has been reduced to 0.3µm in the latter model -- from 0.6µm in the EOS-1Ds Mark II, which translates to the EOS-1D Mark III's pixels having about the same light gathering area as the EOS-1D Mark II or EOS-1D Mark II N. Despite this fact, both cameras have a pixel pitch of 8.2µm square. Each pixel's amplifier has been enlarged; this has helped to reduce dark current noise in the EOS-1D Mark III by a factor of 1.33X, relative to the EOS-1D Mark II/EOS-1D Mark II N. Banding noise in the EOS-1D Mark III has been lowered by the equivalent of one stop, also relative to the EOS-1D Mark II/EOS-1D Mark II N. This has been achieved largely through improvements in the camera's firmware. New noise reduction routines are employed in the EOS-1D Mark III's twin DIGIC III processors. The EOS-1D Mark III is the first Canon digital SLR to employ 14-bit analog-to-digital conversion, up from 12-bit in previous models. This means the maximum number of tone steps possible in a RAW CR2 jumps from 4096 to 16,384. This is a contributing factor in the camera's smoother shadow gradations, though not the only factor.)!

Rylsky, by the way, is also a highly gifted land-/cityscape photographer...!

Looks like you was in his studio or meet him and that's why you know so much about what equipment Rylsky used:)
Very intriguing!

Some of those visiting MetArt are professional photographers and artists, and technical feedback may be very interesting for these -- oftentimes gifted -- persons!
In order to make MetArt even better, it's also -- I'm sure you'll understand -- important to supply the company with adequate and correct information.

Yes,understood.

Thats just a bunch of technical mumbo jumbo... What it boils down to is this set is "typical" of this photographer, and thats not a good thing! If this guy is "gifted" at shooting anything else, I wish he would go do that! Too inconsistent with the girls.

Take a chance! All comments now became public and photographers read it for sure.

You can describe your ideas right here about what you wanted from Rylsky to be done in sets. Or maybe describe to him what is "typical of this photographer" - it will be very useful to know what is wrong. Black dress? Posing? Curly hair? Smiles? Light? Megapixels? Lenses? Colours? Models he choose for Met Art? Closeups? Facial expressions? Weather? ........?

Or you wrote your comment just because you wanted him to stop shoot nudes for Met Art and go to forest shoot mushrooms only?

Let him know. Enjoy this possibility.

LOL "Mushrooms"!? In the forest!? lol I don't know what he does other than this, but if it's "nature" photography, I applaud him.
But I have serious doubts about the photographers here, taking advice from the membership. If I thought they would, I might take the time to be more specific with my "critique".

Yes, plese be more specific, it will be helpful. You know in a real life, when you wanted coffee and milk, to say "bad coffee" is not as useful as "please add milk". If you ever visited RylskyArt - you have seen that he made specific sets when members asked for this and model agreed.
And keep in mind that you can sometimes see in today's update the set that was made years before comments. And sometimes model is not modeling anymore but sets are in schedule for future year and more.

Virginia Sun is so lovely and innocent looking and such a beautiful body. It pains me terribly seeing all these beautiful girls with the classic yellow teeth that say they are smokers. The eastern block must have the highest rate of smoking among young women of any area in the world! So sad, Even girls as lovely as this lose there luster if they smoke. For non smokers there is nothing that is more of a turn off. :(

Hipshot her teeth are not that yellow. Any whiter and they would most likely be those fake veneers. They are perfect teeth--I wish mine looked that good. I am non-smoker too, and absolutely will not date a woman who does smoke, but in this case we cannot conclude that she is a smoker.

Sad that there is no way of knowing. As you say, that is a very important factor for us non smokers. I am very glad that Met girls are never photographed smoking as girls are on other sites. No matter how good looking a woman is when I see her light up she becomes a non person for me.

Why not knowing? Virginia Sun is non-smoker.

Met Art contains galleries with cigarette in girl's hand and mouth, strange you didn't knew it. Look at sets featuring ANNA AJ or JENYA D, and more.
Maybe they are just "not your" type of models, but they was "top 10" marked.

Jenya D is definitely not my type. Anna AJ is though but with 57 sets I might not have seen it. At any rate there are enough girls to go around.

And how do you know Virginia Sun is non-smoker?

I know Virginia is non-smoker because I know hundreds of models here personally.

Oui, elle ne fume pas ...!

Those acquainted with Rylsky's use of light and composition etc, are -- probably -- going to rate this set "10"!

Phototechnically todays MetArt updates has the highest average quality we've seen so far...!

Way, way to much air brushing of the skin. It looks unnatural. Her skin looks like that of a plastic doll.

I like Met, which photos and areas are you referring to? If there's any air brushing its very well done. I didn't see any just viewing the high res photos, but alterations are nearly impossible to hide when the photos are viewed in photo editing software at high magnification. I think Virginia just has a great complexion! It may also be make-up that is giving the look you refer to.

For my money, just about the most sexy face in MetArt, and that is an amazing hairdo. Lovely set!




Access The Full Set Of 128 Images By Joining MetArt Today!
CLICK for FREE ACCESS